THE CARDIAC OUTPUT IN ACUTE RHEUMATIC CARDITIS
E. Besterman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.16.1.8
1954-01-01
Abstract:In the treatment of rheumatic fever by rest in bed, one of the most important clinical decisions needed is the stage in the recovery process when graded exercise may be safely initiated. Since the principle underlying this is the avoidance of extra work by the heart until it is fit again to undertake it, and since no direct information is available, we thought it advisable to investigate how the heart dealt with the mild degree of extra work entailed in a short period of exercise at various stages during the recovery process. The ultimate object was to ascertain the point at which the heart showed a normal response to effort. The present observations deal with the relation between cardiac output, pulse rate, and oxygen consumption, using data obtained by cardiac catheterization. We felt justified in employing this method since we had used it earlier to establish the presence or absence of pericardial effusion in active cases and had at no time encountered ill-effects, discomfort, or distress. We were first concerned with the meaning of the tachycardia that has been traditionally accepted as a common sign of activity. This earlier work seemed to establish two facts. (1) In active rheumatic carditis uncomplicated by gross valve damage, pericardial effusion, or congestive heart failure, tachycardia did not appear to be disproportionate to fever and anxiety. (2) Tachycardia induced by means of atropine led to an increase ofcardiac output which was proportional to the rate, and did not differ in degree from controls; the critical rate, beyond which any further increase led to a fall in output, was not established, but it could hardly have been less than in controls, for no decrease was observed with rates up to 160 (Hollman, 1950). While these investigations were in progress, parallel observations were being made on heart size. Using Wood's method of demonstrating pericardial effusion by means of cardiac catheterization, it was found that enlargement of the heart shadow in active rheumatic carditis nearly always depended on some severe valve lesion, congestive heart failure, or pericardial effusion (Wood, 1950; Besterman and Thomas, 1953), and rarely occurred otherwise. Since the venous pressure and blood pressure were also normal in uncomplicated cases, it looked as if the circulation as a whole was not disturbed. It was decided to check this conclusion by measuring the effect of effort on the cardiac output itself, and seeing whether cases of rheumatic carditis behaved similarly to cases in whom recovery had occurred.