Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly in Mainland China

Dongzhi Li,Mei Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1876

2007-12-15

Prenatal Diagnosis

Abstract:Anytime a couple becomes pregnant, there is a 3 to 4% chance that their baby will have a congenital anomaly. The rate of 3 to 4% is sometimes called the background rate or the population risk rate for birth defects. Birth defects are the leading cause of infant deaths, and babies born with defects also have a greater chance of illness and long-term disability (Winter, 1996). Hence, when a serious anomaly is suspected prenatally, some parents request termination of pregnancy. This request may be based on the results of investigations that imply that the baby will almost certainly have a lethal or severe anomaly, for example, chromosomal or genetic abnormality revealed by laboratory analyses. In other instances, the implications of the investigations are less clear, for example, fetuses with varied degrees of structural malformation revealed by ultrasound. After termination of pregnancy the accuracy of the prenatal prediction and the implications for future pregnancies, particularly when based on ultrasonographic findings only, may be obtained from fetal autopsy. However, autopsy rates have fallen in many countries in recent years (Brodlie et al., 2002). Here we report the fetal autopsy rate at a tertiary referral center in Mainland China. During the period 2002 to 2006, there were 22 003 deliveries in our hospital. As many as 259 (1.1%) were terminations because of prenatally diagnosed abnormality. Chromosome or genetic anomalies accounted for 41 of these. The remaining 218 cases were diagnosed prenatally by ultrasound scan as structural anomalies without evidence of abnormal karyotype. Of these, autopsy was performed in 92 (42.2%) fetuses and refused in 126 (57.8%) fetuses. The rate of autopsy during the 5 years of study is summarized in Table 1. An autopsy is an important audit tool that has contributed greatly to clinical knowledge (Lyon, 2004). Fetal autopsy has a particularly valuable role in the counseling of families after the termination of a pregnancy with a fetus-suspected anomaly. Not knowing the cause of such a tragic occurrence can burden the parents with guilt and impede the grieving process. In addition, subsequent pregnancies may be faced with great trepidation, with parents uncertain of the risks they face because they never understood the reason for the first abnormal pregnancy. Sometimes, additional evidence from an autopsy may provide important information that changes the estimated risk of recurrence, especially when a prenatal diagnosis is based on the results of ultrasound scan only (Boyd et al., 2004). Even in cases where autopsy does not disclose additional information, the confirmation that the clinical diagnoses were correct is reassuring to parents and clinicians. Despite its importance, perinatal autopsy rate has been falling. In this study of a Chinese population over a 5year period, the fetal autopsy rate has remained very low despite an increase in the number of terminations of pregnancy after prenatal suspicion of fetal abnormality. The reasons for the low autopsy rate are multifactorial and complex in China. The negative attitude of the general public to autopsy is the main obstacle to this procedure. Public attitude toward autopsy is usually based on secular (emotional and cultural) or religious considerations, or often a combination of both. In traditional Chinese culture, there is a deep respect for the body as a gift to be cared for, and a strong belief that the body should be left intact after death to maintain physical and spiritual harmony. Therefore, parents often refuse an autopsy because they feel that their baby has already been through so much and they do not want the body mutilated. Other reasons for the low rate of autopsy include: failure of medical professionals to provide an adequate explanation of the need for an autopsy; the assumption that prenatal ultrasound testing was sufficient; and the requirement of appropriate consent or other authorization for an autopsy, which define the limits of the procedure. Obviously, these problems need to be addressed but it would definitely require a long time before a change in attitude or behavior could occur.