Abstract:Background: Meniscus root tears lead to de-tensioning of the meniscus, increased contact forces, and cartilage damage. Management of older patients with root tears is controversial and the efficacy of different treatment options is unclear. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients with moderate knee osteoarthritis who underwent an all-inside meniscus root repair technique versus nonoperative management for either medial or lateral meniscus root tears. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients with a diagnosed posterior meniscus root tear who underwent arthroscopic repair (AR: 30 knees) or nonoperative treatment with observation (O: 18 knees) were followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean follow-up, 4.4 years). The arthroscopic repair included all-inside sutures to reduce the root back to its remnant (reduction sutures), thereby re-tensioning the meniscus, and 1 mattress suture to strengthen the repair by reapproximating the construct to the posterior capsule. The data collected included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm, Tegner, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Results: Medial meniscus root tears comprised 80.0% of the AR group and 77.8% of the O group. The average Kellgren-Lawrence grade was 2 in both groups. The baseline scores for the KOOS Symptoms subscale were lower for AR (50.2 ± 19.3) than for O (66.5 ± 16.1) ( P = .003), as were the KOOS Knee-Related Quality of Life scores (AR, 26.7 ± 16.1; O, 39.6 ± 22.1) ( P = .046). No differences were found between groups for the absolute values at follow-up except that follow-up Tegner scores were lower in the O group than in the AR group ( P = .004). Significant improvements were seen in the AR group from baseline to ultimate follow-up in average KOOS subscale scores ( P < .001), Lysholm scores ( P < .001), Tegner scores ( P = .0002), and VR-12 PCS scores ( P < .001), whereas the O group had a significant improvement only in average KOOS Pain ( P = .003), KOOS Function in Daily Living ( P = .006), and VR-12 PCS ( P = .038) scores. Compared with the O group, the AR group had a significantly larger improvement from baseline to follow-up in average KOOS Pain ( P = .009), KOOS Symptoms ( P = .029), and Lysholm scores ( P = .016). During follow-up, 3.3% of the AR group underwent a TKA compared with 33.3% of the O group ( P = .008). The hazard ratio of TKA conversion was 93.2% lower for the AR group compared with the O group ( P = .013). Conclusion: All-inside medial or lateral meniscus root repair showed improved functional outcomes and decreased TKA conversion rates compared with nonoperative treatment and may be considered as a treatment option for the management of meniscus root tears in older patients with moderate osteoarthritis.

Management and prevention of SARS in China.

Comparative Efficacy of Root Repair versus Partial Meniscectomy and Observation for Patients with Meniscus Root Tears

Throwing out the baby with the spa water?

Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Treatment: A matched cohort comparison of non-operative management, partial meniscectomy and repair

Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Treatment: A Matched Cohort Comparison of Nonoperative Management, Partial Meniscectomy, and Repair

Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies of Meniscus Root Tears: A Scoping Review

Midterm Outcomes of Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tear Repair: A Systematic Review

Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair Versus Observation in Older Patients With Meniscus Root Tears

Some problems concerning the assay of Clostridium chauvoei vaccine in laboratory animals.

Molecular mechanisms of iron transport.

Isoenzymes of glycogen phosphorylase in human leukocytes and platelets: relation to muscle phosphorylase.

Lateral meniscus posterior root repairs show superior healing, reduced meniscal extrusion and improved clinical outcomes compared to medial meniscus posterior root repairs: A systematic review

Clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with meniscal root tears

Clinical, Radiographic, and MRI Evaluation of All-Inside Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair via Suture Fixation to the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Versus Partial Meniscectomy: Results at 3-Year Follow-up

Most Patients Older Than 40 Years of Age Who Underwent Meniscal Root Repair Presented With an Effusion, a Positive McMurray Test, and a Positive Hyperflexion Test

Arthroscopic meniscal posterior root repair combined with centralization reduces medial menicus extrusion associated with posterior root tears: One‐year clinical outcomes

Association Between Transtibial Meniscus Root Repair and Rate of Meniscal Healing and Extrusion on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Patient-reported Outcomes After Medial Meniscus Root Tear Repair Versus Other Medial Meniscus Repairs: An Exploratory Meta-analysis of Single-arm Cohorts

Clinical outcomes following transtibial medial meniscal root repair are maintained at long‐term follow‐up

Lateral meniscal posterior root tears experience acceptable healing status after transtibial repair technique

Medial Meniscus Root Reconstruction using Gracillis Tendon Autograft in Managing Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear: A Preliminary Case Series