Systematic review of systematic reviews of acupuncture.

E. Ernst
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/CLINMEDICINE.6-5-508
2006-09-01
Abstract:Clinical Medicine Vol 6 No 6 November/December 2006 623 inadequate for BCC, even those BCCs with a small diameter.3 A recent study showed that for BCCs measuring on average 6x5 mm, excision margins of 1, 2 or 3 mm resulted in positive margins of 16%, 24% and 13% respectively.3 Sharpe states that the recommendation for BCC at high-risk sites or morphoeic BCC is 5 mm. For morphoeic BCCs that measure 10–20 mm in diameter, a 5 mm margin achieves a clearance rate of 82%.4 It has been shown that on average, morphoeic BCC have subclinical extensions of approximately 7 mm.5 For this reason, Mohs micrographic surgery (where available) is the treatment of choice for highrisk or morphoeic BCCs as this form of surgery has the lowest recurrence rates and conserves as much normal skin as possible. If Mohs surgery is not selected then margins of 10 mm or more may be required to completely remove morphoeic BCC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?