Will Cognitiob , survive ?

J. Morton

Abstract:An early decision for the theorist is that of deciding on a for-m of expression. My own decision in this respect has been to adopt the conventions of information processing modelling. The main principle here is to try to isolate processes which can be regarded as functionally modular. These processes are symbolised by boxes with inputs and outputs specified, usually in terms of the form of the n,ode they carry. The extent to which sub-processes are diffe.rentiated will depend upon the data currently being considered. Equally, the extent to which the mechanism of a particular process is specified will also depend upon the data being considered. There is the assumption, however, that the nature of a particular process has no bearing on the form of the model as a whole. Let me take one example. On the basis of a number of experiments on long-term facilitation effects on the recognition of Lc;histoscopically presented words my co-workers and I have proposed the existence of a modality-specific input lexicon, also called the ‘visual input logogen system’ (Morton, 1979). This process is responsible for categorizing a string of letters in terms of its morphemic content. It has inputs from processes which analyse the visual input and form central processes which use the available context. Its output is in terms of the morphol.ogical constituents of the input, and this output is passed to processes responsible for syntactic and semantic analysis. The data indicates that this input lexicon is separate from an equivalent process which performs the same function for speech inputs. At its most elementary, the resulting model is as in Figure I. The data seem to require a configuration of this form. However, the way in