Modern Medicine and the Rejection of Death

J. Urzúa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X9101900317
1991-08-01
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Abstract:Modern medicine strives for life: its declared aim is to defeat disease and to prolong patients' lives. But is rejection of death a necessary consequence of this medical goal? I would like to examine this dilemma by looking at the problems raised by technology, and the goals of modern medicine, as opposed to traditional medicine. Medicine is essentially a service rendered by one person to another who is confronted with the transcendentals of birth, disease and death. In contrast with traditional medicine, modern medicine requires complex technology such as computerised tomography, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonic li thotripters, angiography, mechanical ventilation, cardiac surgery and nuclear medicine. However, technology began to enter medicine comparatively recently, approximately at the time of Morton's successful demonstration of ether anaesthesia in 1846. Before that time, therapies available to physicians were few and mostly ineffective. Surgical operations were few, mainly superficial excisions and amputations, and carried a prohibitive mortality. Abdominal surgery was virtually impossible before anaesthesia. The relationship of bacteria to infection was unknown. Pharmacology was limited to a few drugs from natural sources: synthetic chemistry and scientific therapeutics were in their infancy. The use of X-rays, radioactivity, the hypodermic syringe, surgical instruments, and the stethoscope are all products of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and they mark the gradual entrance of technology into medicine. Mention must also be made of the relatively recent growth of knowledge in physiology, pathology and the systematic classification of diseases.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?