Abstract:Abstract Background Improved outcome prediction in individuals at high risk for psychosis may facilitate targeted early intervention. Studies suggest that improved outcome prediction may be achieved through the use of neurocognitive or neuroimaging data, on their own or in addition to clinical data. This study examines whether adding resting-state functional connectivity data to validated clinical predictors of psychosis improve outcome prediction in the prodromal stage. Methods This study involves 137 adolescents and young adults at Clinical High Risk (CHR) for psychosis from the Shanghai At Risk for Psychosis (SHARP) program. Based on outcome after one-year follow-up, participants were separated into three outcome categories: good outcome (symptom remission, N = 71), intermediate outcome (ongoing CHR symptoms, N = 30), and poor outcome (conversion to psychosis or treatment-refractory, N = 36). Resting-state fMRI data were acquired for each participant and processed using the Conn toolbox, including rigorous motion correction. Multinomial logistic regression analysis and leave-one-out cross-validation were used to assess the performance of three prediction models: 1) a clinical-only model using validated clinical predictors from the NAPLS-2 psychosis-risk calculator, 2) an fMRI-only model using measures of functional connectome organization and within/between-network connectivity among established resting-state networks, and 3) a combined clinical and fMRI prediction model. Model performance was assessed using the harmonic mean of the positive predictive value and sensitivity for each outcome category. This F1 measure was compared to expected chance-levels using a permutation test with 1,000 sampled permutations in order to evaluate the statistical significance of the model’s prediction. Results The clinical-only prediction model failed to achieve a significant level of outcome prediction (F1 = 0.32, F1-chance = 0.26 □ 0.06, p = .154). The fMRI-only model did predict clinical outcome to a significant degree (F1 = 0.41, F1-chance = 0.29 □ 0.06, p = .016), but the combined clinical and fMRI prediction model showed the best performance (F1 = 0.46, F1-chance = 0.29 □ 0.06, p < .001). On average, positive predictive values (reflecting the probability that an outcome label predicted by the model was correct) were 39% better than chance-level and 32% better than the clinical-only model. Analyzing the contribution of individual predictor variables showed that GAF functional decline, a family history of psychosis, and performance on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test were the most influential clinical predictors, whereas modular connectome organization, default-mode and fronto-parietal within-network connectivity, and between-network connectivity among language, salience, dorsal attention, cerebellum, and sensorimotor networks were the leading fMRI predictors. Discussion This study’s findings suggest that functional brain abnormalities reflected by alterations in resting-state functional connectivity precede and may drive subsequent changes in clinical functioning. Moreover, the findings show that markers of functional brain connectivity may be useful for improving early identification and clinical decision-making in prodromal psychosis.

Brain Functional Connectivity and Anatomical Features as Predictors of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Outcome for Anxiety in Youths

Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling of Individual Anxiety

Brain connectomics predict response to treatment in social anxiety disorder

Neurocircuitry of Treatment in Anxiety Disorders

Self-focused brain predictors of cognitive behavioral therapy response in a transdiagnostic sample

Normalization of Fronto-Parietal Activation by Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Unmedicated Pediatric Patients With Anxiety Disorders

Neural predictors of cognitive-behavior therapy outcome in anxiety-related disorders: a meta-analysis of task-based fMRI studies

Functional brain connectivity data improve clinical outcome prediction in youth at risk for psychosis

Disrupted Intrinsic Functional Connectivity of the Cognitive Control Network Underlies Disease Severity and Executive Dysfunction in First-Episode, Treatment-Naive Adolescent Depression.

Changes in functional connectivity with cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder predict outcomes at follow-up

Brain Functional Connectome Defines a Transdiagnostic Dimension Shared by Cognitive Function and Psychopathology in Preadolescents

Neural predictors and mechanisms of cognitive behavioral therapy on threat processing in social anxiety disorder

Resting state amygdala-prefrontal connectivity predicts symptom change after cognitive behavioral therapy in generalized social anxiety disorder

Brain functional connectivity data enhance prediction of clinical outcome in youth at risk for psychosis.

Neural correlates of cognitive behavioral therapy response in youth with negative valence disorders: A systematic review of the literature

Basolateral amygdala–ventromedial prefrontal cortex connectivity predicts cognitive behavioural therapy outcome in adults with obsessive–compulsive disorder

Can Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Normalize Neural Function in Youths With Pediatric Anxiety Disorders? A Developmental Neuroscience Perspective

Individualized Prediction of PTSD Symptom Severity in Trauma Survivors From Whole-Brain Resting-State Functional Connectivity

Lack of evidence for predictive utility from resting state fMRI data for individual exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy outcomes: A machine learning study in two large multi-site samples in anxiety disorders

Depression-related anterior cingulate prefrontal resting state connectivity normalizes following cognitive behavioral therapy

Predicting Responses to Electroconvulsive Therapy in Adolescents with Treatment-Refractory Depression Based on Resting-State fMRI