Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA and Risk of Future Nasopharyngeal Cancer

K C Allen Chan,W K Jacky Lam,Ann King,Vivien S Lin,Patrick P H Lee,Benny C Y Zee,Stephen L Chan,Irene O L Tse,Amy F C Tsang,Maggie Z J Li,Peiyong Jiang,Qi Yong H Ai,Darren M C Poon,K H Au,Edwin P Hui,Brigette B Y Ma,Andrew C Van Hasselt,Anthony T C Chan,John K S Woo,Y M Dennis Lo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2200309
Abstract:BACKGROUND: We previously conducted a prospective study to show that nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) screening with circulating Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA analysis can improve survival. However, the long-term significance of positive results in individuals without cancer was unclear. METHODS: We conducted a second-round screening at a median of 43 months after the initial screening. Participants with detectable plasma EBV DNA were retested in 4 weeks, and those with persistently positive results were investigated with nasal endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Of the 20,174 volunteers who participated in the first-round screening, 17,838 (88.6%) were rescreened. Among them, 423 (2.37%) had persistently detectable plasma EBV DNA. Twenty-four patients were identified as having NPC. A significantly higher proportion of patients had stage I/II cancer than in a historical cohort (67% vs. 20%; chi-square test, P<0.001), and they had superior 3-year progression-free survival (100% vs. 78.8%). Compared with participants with undetectable plasma EBV DNA in the first round of screening, participants with transiently and persistently positive results in the first round were more likely to have a cancer identified in the second round, with relative risks of 4.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 15.0) and 16.8 (95% confidence interval, 5.7 to 49.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with detectable plasma EBV DNA but without an immediately identifiable NPC were more likely to have the cancer identified in another round of screening performed 3 to 5 years later. (Funded by Kadoorie Charitable Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02063399.)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?