Editorial Commentary: Recurrence Rates Following Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Differ Among Contact and Collision Sports and Are Higher in Collision Sports

Erik Hohmann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.08.017
Abstract:Collision and contact sports athletes are at higher risk of shoulder dislocations. In collision sports such as boxing, ice hockey, rugby, football, and various martial arts, the athlete purposely hits or collides with other athletes or objects with substantial force, whereas in contact sports such as basketball, field hockey, wrestling, and soccer, the athlete makes regular contact with other athletes but with substantially less force. Return-to-sports rates following arthroscopic shoulder stabilization are above 90%. Risk factors for a recurrent shoulder dislocation include younger age, previous dislocations, generalized hyperlaxity, an instability severity index score above 3, off-track lesions, glenoid bone loss, and participation in contact and collision sports. However, data from a recent study have shown that the rate of recurrence varies among different contact sports as both kinematics and kinetics are clearly different. Ice hockey (ES, 0.72) has been identified as the collision sport with the highest recurrence rate. Wrestling (ES, 0.33), rugby (ES, 0.23), martial arts (ES, 0.20), and boxing (ES, 0.18) had similar recurrence rates, but the effect sizes were 3 times lower when compared to ice hockey. The lowest recurrence rates were observed in field hockey (ES, 0.04), football (ES, 0.06), and soccer (ES, 0.06). The sample size was sufficient, but the moderate risk of bias and study quality suggest that the true effect will most likely be markedly different from the estimated effect. Although common sense dictates that recurrence rates should be different, scientific evidence is not supporting this motion, and the findings should be viewed with some caution.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?