Abstract:Background: Securing an early accurate diagnosis of diabetic foot infections and assessment of their severity are of paramount importance since these infections can cause great morbidity and potential mortality and present formidable challenges in surgical and antimicrobial treatment. Methods: In June 2022, we searched the literature using PubMed and EMBASE for published studies on the diagnosis of diabetic foot infection (DFI). On the basis of pre-determined criteria, we reviewed prospective controlled, as well as non-controlled, studies in English. We then developed evidence statements based on the included papers. Results: We selected a total of 64 papers that met our inclusion criteria. The certainty of the majority of the evidence statements was low because of the weak methodology of nearly all of the studies. The available data suggest that diagnosing diabetic foot infections on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms and classified according to the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot/Infectious Diseases Society of America scheme correlates with the patient's likelihood of the need for hospitalisation, lower extremity amputation, and risk of death. Elevated levels of selected serum inflammatory markers such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein and procalcitonin are supportive, but not diagnostic, of soft tissue infection. Culturing tissue samples of soft tissues or bone, when care is taken to avoid contamination, provides more accurate microbiological information than culturing superficial (swab) samples. Although non-culture techniques, especially next-generation sequencing, are likely to identify more bacteria from tissue samples including bone than standard cultures, no studies have established a significant impact on the management of patients with DFIs. In patients with suspected diabetic foot osteomyelitis, the combination of a positive probe-to-bone test and elevated ESR supports this diagnosis. Plain X-ray remains the first-line imaging examination when there is suspicion of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO), but advanced imaging methods including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear imaging when MRI is not feasible help in cases when either the diagnosis or the localisation of infection is uncertain. Intra-operative or non-per-wound percutaneous biopsy is the best method to accurately identify bone pathogens in case of a suspicion of a DFO. Bedside percutaneous biopsies are effective and safe and are an option to obtain bone culture data when conventional (i.e. surgical or radiological) procedures are not feasible. Conclusions: The results of this systematic review of the diagnosis of diabetic foot infections provide some guidance for clinicians, but there is still a need for more prospective controlled studies of high quality.

Inflammatory markers in diabetic foot infection: a meta-analysis

The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

C-reactive protein and diabetic foot ulcer infections: A meta-analysis

The impact of inflammatory biomarkers on amputation rates in patients with diabetic foot ulcers

[Characteristics of Inflammatory Markers in Diabetic Foot Patients and Their Relationship With Prognosis of Diabetic Foot Ulcers]

Update of biomarkers to diagnose diabetic foot osteomyelitis: A meta-analysis and systematic review

The potential impact and diagnostic value of inflammatory markers on diabetic foot progression in type II diabetes mellitus: A case-control study

Improving Dietary Intake of Essential Nutrients Can Ameliorate Inflammation in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Clinical, microbiological and inflammatory markers of severe diabetic foot infections

Gene expression levels of inflammatory mediators in diabetic foot ulcer patients

Fibrinogen,high sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in subjects with type 2 diabetic patients with foot infection and the correlation between these two facts

Correlation between inflammatory factors, autophagy protein levels, and infection in granulation tissue of diabetic foot ulcer

[ 18 F]FDG Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities in the Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Meta-Analysis

Factors Associated with Infection Severity of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Cross-Sectional Study.

The Metabolic Characteristics of Patients at the Risk for Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Comparative Study of Diabetic Patients with and without Diabetic Foot

Diagnosis of infection in the foot of patients with diabetes: A systematic review

A study of Apolipoprotein A1(ApoA1) And Interleukin-10(IL-10) In Diabetes With Foot Ulcers

An evaluation of inflammatory and endothelial dysfunction markers as determinants of peripheral arterial disease in those with diabetes mellitus

CHARACTERISTICS OF IMMUNOREACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH VARIOUS FORMS OF DIABETIC FOOT ULCER

Diabetic Foot in Beijing from a Retrospective Study

The adverse effects of novel coronavirus on diabetic foot patients A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis