Chronic Low Back Pain Causal Risk Factors Identified by Mendelian Randomization: a Cross-Sectional Cohort Analysis
Patricia Zheng,Aaron Scheffler,Susan Ewing,Trisha Hue,Sara Jones Berkeley,Saam Morshed,Wolf Mehling,Abel Torres-Espin,Anoop Galivanche,Jeffrey Lotz,Thomas Peterson,Conor O'Neill
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.23.24314235
2024-09-27
Abstract:Background Context: There are a number of risk factors- from biological, psychological,
and social domains- for non-specific chronic low back pain (cLBP). Many cLBP
treatments target risk factors on the assumption that the targeted factor is not just
associated with cLBP but is also a cause (i.e, a causal risk factor). In most cases this
is a strong assumption, primarily due to the possibility of confounding variables. False
assumptions about the causal relationships between risk factors and cLBP likely
contribute to the generally marginal results from cLBP treatments.
Purpose: The objectives of this study were to a) using rigorous confounding control
compare associations between modifiable causal risk factors identified by Mendelian
randomization (MR) studies with associations in a cLBP population and b) estimate the
association of these risk factors with cLBP outcomes.
Study Design/Setting: Cross sectional analysis of a longitudinal, online, observational
study.
Patient Sample: 1,376 participants in BACKHOME, a longitudinal observational e-
Cohort of U.S. adults with cLBP that is part of the NIH Back Pain Consortium
(BACPAC) Research Program.
Outcome Measures: Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity (PEG) Scale.
Methods: Five risk factors were selected based on evidence from MR randomization
studies: sleep disturbance, depression, BMI, alcohol use, and smoking status.
Confounders were identified using the ESC-DAG approach, a rigorous method for
building directed acyclic graphs based on causal criteria. Strong evidence for confounding was found for age, female sex, education, relationship status, financial
strain, anxiety, fear avoidance and catastrophizing. These variables were used to
determine the adjustment sets for the primary analysis. Potential confounders with
weaker evidence were used for a sensitivity analysis.
Results: Participants had the following characteristics: age 54.9 +/- 14.4 years, 67.4%
female, 60% never smokers, 29.9% overweight, 39.5% obese, PROMIS sleep
disturbance T-score 54.8 +/- 8.0, PROMIS depression T-score 52.6 +/- 10.1, Fearavoidance
Beliefs Questionnaire 11.6 +/- 5.9, Patient Catastrophizing Scale 4.5 +/- 2.6,
PEG 4.4 +/- 2.2. In the adjusted models alcohol use, sleep disturbance, depression, and
obesity were associated with PEG, after adjusting for confounding variables identified
via a DAG constructed using a rigorous protocol. The adjusted effect estimates- the
expected change in the PEG outcome for every standard deviation increase or
decrease in the exposure (or category shift for categorical exposures) were the largest
for sleep disturbance and obesity. Each SD increase in the PROMIS sleep disturbance
T-score resulted in a mean 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.88) point increase in baseline PEG
score. Compared to participants with normal BMI, adjusted mean PEG score was
slightly higher by 0.37 points (95% CI: 0.09, 0.65) for overweight participants, about 0.8
to 0.9 points higher for those in obesity classes I and II, and 1.39 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.80)
points higher for the most obese participants. Each SD increase in the PROMIS
depression T-score was associated with a mean 0.28 (95% CI: 0.17, 0.40) point
increase in baseline PEG score, while each SD decrease in number of alcoholic drinks
per week resulted in a mean 0.12 (95%CI: 0.01, 0.23) increase in baseline PEG score
in the adjusted model.
Conclusions: Several modifiable causal risk factors for cLBP - alcohol use, sleep
disturbance, depression, and obesity- are associated with PEG, after adjusting for
confounding variables identified via a DAG constructed using a rigorous protocol.
Convergence of our findings for sleep disturbance, depression, and obesity with the
results from MR studies, which have different designs and biases, strengthens the
evidence for causal relationships between these risk factors and cLBP (1). The
estimated effect of change in a risk factors on change in PEG were the largest for
sleep disturbance and obesity. Future analyses will evaluate these relationships with
longitudinal data.
Epidemiology