Abstract:Background: While the advantages of using the internet and social media for research recruitment are well documented, the evolving online environment also enhances motivations for misrepresentation to receive incentives or to "troll" research studies. Such fraudulent assaults can compromise data integrity, with substantial losses in project time; money; and especially for vulnerable populations, research trust. With the rapid advent of new technology and ever-evolving social media platforms, it has become easier for misrepresentation to occur within online data collection. This perpetuation can occur by bots or individuals with malintent, but careful planning can help aid in filtering out fraudulent data. Objective: Using an example with urban American Indian and Alaska Native young women, this paper aims to describe PRIOR (Protocol for Increasing Data Integrity in Online Research), which is a 2-step integration protocol for combating fraudulent participation in online survey research. Methods: From February 2019 to August 2020, we recruited participants for formative research preparatory to an online randomized control trial of a preconceptual health program. First, we described our initial protocol for preventing fraudulent participation, which proved to be unsuccessful. Then, we described modifications we made in May 2020 to improve the protocol performance and the creation of PRIOR. Changes included transferring data collection platforms, collecting embedded geospatial variables, enabling timing features within the screening survey, creating URL links for each method or platform of data collection, and manually confirming potentially eligible participants' identifying information. Results: Before the implementation of PRIOR, the project experienced substantial fraudulent attempts at study enrollment, with less than 1% (n=6) of 1300 screened participants being identified as truly eligible. With the modified protocol, of the 461 individuals who completed a screening survey, 381 did not meet the eligibility criteria assessed on the survey. Of the 80 that did, 25 (31%) were identified as ineligible via PRIOR. A total of 55 (69%) were identified as eligible and verified in the protocol and were enrolled in the formative study. Conclusions: Fraudulent surveys compromise study integrity, validity of the data, and trust among participant populations. They also deplete scarce research resources including respondent compensation and personnel time. Our approach of PRIOR to prevent online misrepresentation in data was successful. This paper reviews key elements regarding fraudulent data participation in online research and demonstrates why enhanced protocols to prevent fraudulent data collection are crucial for building trust with vulnerable populations. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04376346; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04376346. International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/52281.

Participant Misrepresentation in Online Focus Groups: Red Flags and Proactive Measures

Participant Fraud in Virtual Qualitative Substance Use Research: Recommendations and Considerations for Detection and Prevention Based on a Case Study

Fraudulent Participation in Online Qualitative Studies: Practical Recommendations on an Emerging Phenomenon

Threats of Bots and Other Bad Actors to Data Quality Following Research Participant Recruitment Through Social Media: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire

Threats of Bots and Other Bad Actors to Data Quality Following Research Participant Recruitment Through Social Media: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire (Preprint)

Lessons learned from the MOMENT study on how to recruit and retain a target population online, across borders, and with automated remote data collection

Online recruitment for an online survey study: Our experience of dealing with fraudsters

Methods to reduce fraudulent participation and highlight autistic voices in research

Management of fraudulent participants in online research: Practical recommendations from a randomized controlled feasibility trial

Identifying and preventing fraudulent responses in online public health surveys: Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic

Faking health vulnerabilities to meet eligibility criteria to participate in paid internet-mediated research during the COVID-19 pandemic: three case reports

Addressing fraudulent responses in quantitative and qualitative internet research: case studies from body image and appearance research

Fraudulent participation in psychological research using virtual synchronous interviews: ethical challenges and potential solutions

Combating Fraudulent Participation in Urban American Indian and Alaska Native Virtual Health Research: Protocol for Increasing Data Integrity in Online Research (PRIOR)

Navigating the challenges of imposter participants in online qualitative research: lessons learned from a paediatric health services study

Bot or Not? Detecting and Managing Participant Deception When Conducting Digital Research Remotely: Case Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Improving data quality in online parenting research

Public attitudes towards social media field experiments

Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges

‘Grey areas’: ethical challenges posed by social media-enabled recruitment and online data collection in cross-border, social science research

BT22 Online dermatological surveys: are your participants who you think they are?