Multi-contrast high-field quality image synthesis for portable low-field MRI using generative adversarial networks and paired data

Alfredo Lucas,T Campbell Arnold,Serhat V Okar,Chetan Vadali,Karan D Kawatra,Zheng Ren,Quy Cao,Russell T Shinohara,Matthew K Schindler,Kathryn A Davis,Brian Litt,Daniel S Reich,Joel M Stein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.28.23300409
2023-12-29
MedRxiv
Abstract:Introduction: Portable low-field strength (64mT) MRI scanners promise to increase access to neuroimaging for clinical and research purposes, however these devices produce lower quality images compared to high-field scanners. In this study, we developed and evaluated a deep learning architecture to generate high-field quality brain images from low-field inputs using a paired dataset of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients scanned at 64mT and 3T. Methods: A total of 49 MS patients were scanned on portable 64mT and standard 3T scanners at Penn (n=25) or the National Institutes of Health (NIH, n=24) with T1-weighted, T2-weighted and FLAIR acquisitions. Using this paired data, we developed a generative adversarial network (GAN) architecture for low- to high-field image translation (LowGAN). We then evaluated synthesized images with respect to image quality, brain morphometry, and white matter lesions. Results: Synthetic high-field images demonstrated visually superior quality compared to low-field inputs and significantly higher normalized cross-correlation (NCC) to actual high-field images for T1 (p=0.001) and FLAIR (p<0.001) contrasts. LowGAN generally outperformed the current state-of-the-art for low-field volumetrics. For example, thalamic, lateral ventricle, and total cortical volumes in LowGAN outputs did not differ significantly from 3T measurements. Synthetic outputs preserved MS lesions and captured a known inverse relationship between total lesion volume and thalamic volume. Conclusions: LowGAN generates synthetic high-field images with comparable visual and quantitative quality to actual high-field scans. Enhancing portable MRI image quality could add value and boost clinician confidence, enabling wider adoption of this technology.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?