THE MATURATION OF NORMAL GRANULOCYTOPOIESIS IN VITRO COMPARED WITH THAT OF CHRONIC MYELOCYTIC LEUKEMIA.

I. Boll

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Effects of Telephone Support on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Meta-Analysis

Nan Deng,Ting Gu,Qian Zhao,Xiaoyi Zhang,Fangfang Zhao,Hong He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2018.1425462

2018-01-01

Abstract:The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of disease education or pulmonary rehabilitation programs assisted with telephone support on physical capacity and quality of life (QOL) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library was conducted until May 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of telephone-assisted intervention versus a control group on exercise tolerance and QOL in patients with COPD were included. Two independent authors assessed the methodological quality of the trials using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was conducted with the Revman5.3 to quantify the effects of telephone-assisted interventions on walking capacity and QOL. In total, 10 studies involving 1037 participants were included. Due to the effect of telephone-assisted interventions, statistically significant results were found on Saint-George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) symptom scores [standard mean difference (SMD) -.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) -.33, -.03, p-value .02)], SGRQ impact scores [SMD -.35, 95% CI -.60, -.10, p-value .006)], SGRQ activity scores [SMD -.30, 95% CI -.45, -.15, p-value < .0001)], SGRQ total score [SMD -.36, 95% CI -.51, -.21, p-value < .00001)]. The effects on 6-min walk test (6MWT) and all Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) subscales were not significant (p > .05) based on the insufficient evidence. In conclusion, the role of telephone-assisted interventions in the management of COPD remains equivocal. Some encouraging results were seen with regard to SGRQ symptom, SGRQ impact, SGRQ activity and SGRQ total score. We believe that more methodologically rigorous large-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary to answer this study question.
[Carbon monoxide poisoning in children. A cause of seizures].

K. Michaelsen,K. Taudorf

1983-11-14

Abstract:
Project EPIC (Empowering People to Independence in COPD): Study protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot randomized controlled trial of telephonic, geriatrics-palliative care nurse-coaching in older adults with COPD and their family caregivers

Jun Y Byun,Rachel Wells,Avery C Bechthold,Jazmine Coffee-Dunning,Margaret Armstrong,Richard Taylor,Lanier O'Hare,Mark T Dransfield,Cynthia J Brown,David E Vance,J Nicholas Odom,Marie Bakitas,Anand S Iyer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2024.107487

Abstract:Background: EPIC (Empowering People to Independence in COPD) is a geriatric-palliative care telephonic, nurse coach intervention informed by Baltes' Theory of Successful Aging and adapted from the ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) intervention. EPIC, focused on improving independence, mobility, well-being, and COPD symptoms, has undergone formative and summative evaluation for adults with COPD. Methods: The primary study aim is to assess the refined EPIC intervention's feasibility and acceptability via a pilot hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized control trial in community-dwelling older adults with moderate to severe COPD and their family caregivers. The secondary aim is to explore the impact of EPIC on patient and caregiver outcomes. Older adults with COPD and their family caregivers (target N = 60 dyads) will be randomized to EPIC (intervention) or usual COPD care (control). EPIC includes six patient and four family caregiver weekly, telephone-based nurse coach sessions using a manualized curriculum (Charting Your Course), plus three monthly follow-up calls. Feasibility will be measured as completion of EPIC intervention and trial components (e.g., recruitment, retention, data collection). Acceptability will be evaluated using satisfaction surveys and post-study feedback interviews. A blinded data collector will assess exploratory outcomes (e.g., Life-Space mobility, quality of life, caregiver burden, emotional symptoms, loneliness, cognitive impairment, functional status, healthcare utilization) at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks. Discussion: This intervention fills a gap in addressing the geriatrics and palliative care needs and equity for adults with COPD and their family caregivers. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05040386.
Telehealth vs In-Person Early Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial

Joseph A Greer,Jennifer S Temel,Areej El-Jawahri,Simone Rinaldi,Mihir Kamdar,Elyse R Park,Nora K Horick,Kedie Pintro,Dustin J Rabideau,Lee Schwamm,Josephine Feliciano,Isaac Chua,Konstantinos Leventakos,Stacy M Fischer,Toby C Campbell,Michael W Rabow,Finly Zachariah,Laura C Hanson,Sara F Martin,Maria Silveira,Laura Shoemaker,Marie Bakitas,Jessica Bauman,Lori Spoozak,Carl Grey,Leslie Blackhall,Kimberly Curseen,Sean O'Mahony,Melanie M Smith,Ramona Rhodes,Amelia Cullinan,Vicki Jackson,REACH PC Investigators,Chardria Trotter,Emily Gallagher Medeiros,Brooke A Calton,Heather A Carlson,Leslie Cartagena,Michelle Diop,Theresa Evans,James G Jackson,Karen O'Brien,Laura A Petrillo,Jennifer S Shin,Ilene Browner,Nathaniel Gray,Mark Awad,James Tulsky,Kelly J Christensen,Laura S Rhee,Jacob Strand,Devin Gilhuly,Nicole Rondinelli,Jennifer Seibert,Jonathan Treem,Kate Schueller,Gregory Allen,Collin Blakely,Matthew Gubens,Paul Lindenfeld,Claire Mulvey,Natalie Young,William Dale,Joanna Luna,Eric Mecusker,Jeanine Moreno,Carey Ramirez,Sari Williams,Sean Gaffney,Cynthia Kelly,Kyle Lavin,Wade Iams,Samuel G Robbins,Greg Kalemkerian,Ruth Lagman,Kyle Neale,Chirag Patel,Renato Samala,Elizabeth Weinstein,Susan McCammon,Richard Taylor,Rodney Tucker,Marcin Chwistek,Molly Collins,Martin Edelman,Julia Judd,Leigh Kinczewski,Kathleen Murphy,Dylan Sherry,Marie Welsh,Christian Sinclair,Elizabeth Wulff-Burchfield,Jennifer Gabbard,Tiffany Statler,Nathaniel Timmins,Dio Kavalieratos,Jane Lowers,Tammie Quest,Elaine Chen,Giulia LaBellarte,Nisha Mohinda,Natalie K Munger,Michelle Munroe,Jyoti D Patel,Eytan Szmuilowicz,Julia H Vermylen,Caitlin H Siropaides,Christopher G Ahern,Emily G Kobin,Maxwell T Vergo,Matthew M Wilson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.13964

IF: 11.816

2024-09-11

JAMA

Abstract:Importance: Numerous studies show that early palliative care improves quality of life and other key outcomes in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers, although most lack access to this evidence-based model of care. Objective: To evaluate whether delivering early palliative care via secure video vs in-person visits has an equivalent effect on quality of life in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design, setting, and participants: Randomized, multisite, comparative effectiveness trial from June 14, 2018, to May 4, 2023, at 22 US cancer centers among 1250 patients within 12 weeks of diagnosis of advanced NSCLC and 548 caregivers. Intervention: Participants were randomized to meet with a specialty-trained palliative care clinician every 4 weeks either via video visit or in person in the outpatient clinic from the time of enrollment and throughout the course of disease. The video visit group had an initial in-person visit to establish rapport, followed by subsequent virtual visits. Main outcomes and measures: Equivalence of the effect of video visit vs in-person early palliative care on quality of life at week 24 per the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung questionnaire (equivalence margin of ±4 points; score range: 0-136, with higher scores indicating better quality of life). Participants completed study questionnaires at enrollment and at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48. Results: By 24 weeks, participants (mean age, 65.5 years; 54.0% women; 82.7% White) had a mean of 4.7 (video) and 4.9 (in-person) early palliative care encounters. Patient-reported quality-of-life scores were equivalent between groups (video mean, 99.7 vs in-person mean, 97.7; difference, 2.0 [90% CI, 0.1-3.9]; P = .04 for equivalence). Rate of caregiver participation in visits was lower for video vs in-person early palliative care (36.6% vs 49.7%; P < .001). Study groups did not differ in caregiver quality of life, patient coping, or patient and caregiver satisfaction with care, mood symptoms, or prognostic perceptions. Conclusions and relevance: The delivery of early palliative care virtually vs in person demonstrated equivalent effects on quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC, underscoring the considerable potential for improving access to this evidence-based care model through telehealth delivery. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03375489.
Effect of a Hospital-Initiated Program Combining Transitional Care and Long-term Self-management Support on Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Hanan Aboumatar,Mohammad Naqibuddin,Suna Chung,Hina Chaudhry,Samuel W Kim,Jamia Saunders,Lee Bone,Ayse P Gurses,Amy Knowlton,Peter Pronovost,Nirupama Putcha,Cynthia Rand,Debra Roter,Carol Sylvester,Carol Thompson,Jennifer L Wolff,Judith Hibbard,Robert A Wise

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.11982

IF: 11.816

2019-10-08

JAMA

Abstract:Importance: Patients hospitalized for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations have high rehospitalization rates and reduced quality of life. Objective: To evaluate whether a hospital-initiated program that combined transition and long-term self-management support for patients hospitalized due to COPD and their family caregivers can improve outcomes. Design, setting, and participants: Single-site randomized clinical trial conducted in Baltimore, Maryland, with 240 participants. Participants were patients hospitalized due to COPD, randomized to intervention or usual care, and followed up for 6 months after hospital discharge. Enrollment occurred from March 2015 to May 2016; follow-up ended in December 2016. Interventions: The intervention (n = 120) involved a comprehensive 3-month program to help patients and their family caregivers with long-term self-management of COPD. It was delivered by nurses with special training on supporting patients with COPD using standardized tools. Usual care (n = 120) included transition support for 30 days after discharge to ensure adherence to discharge plan and connection to outpatient care. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was number of COPD-related acute care events (hospitalizations and emergency department visits) per participant at 6 months. The co-primary outcome was change in participants' health-related quality of life measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at 6 months after discharge (score, 0 [best] to 100 [worst]; 4-point difference is clinically meaningful). Results: Among 240 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 64.9 [9.8] years; 61.7% women), 203 (85%) completed the study. The mean (SD) baseline SGRQ score was 62.3 (18.8) in the intervention group and 63.6 (17.4) in the usual care group. The mean number of COPD-related acute care events per participant at 6 months was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.01-1.79) in the intervention group vs 0.72 (95% CI, 0.45-0.97) in the usual care group (difference, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.22-1.15]; P = .004). The mean change in participants' SGRQ total score at 6 months was 2.81 in the intervention group and -2.69 in the usual care group (adjusted difference, 5.18 [95% CI, -2.15 to 12.51]; P = .11). During the study period, there were 15 deaths (intervention: 8; usual care: 7) and 339 hospitalizations (intervention: 202; usual care: 137). Conclusions and relevance: In a single-site randomized clinical trial of patients hospitalized due to COPD, a 3-month program that combined transition and long-term self-management support resulted in significantly greater COPD-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits, without improvement in quality of life. Further research is needed to determine reasons for this unanticipated finding. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02036294.
Effect of a Program Combining Transitional Care and Long-term Self-management Support on Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Hanan Aboumatar,Mohammad Naqibuddin,Suna Chung,Hina Chaudhry,Samuel W Kim,Jamia Saunders,Lee Bone,Ayse P Gurses,Amy Knowlton,Peter Pronovost,Nirupama Putcha,Cynthia Rand,Debra Roter,Carol Sylvester,Carol Thompson,Jennifer L Wolff,Judith Hibbard,Robert A Wise

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.17933

IF: 11.816

2018-12-11

JAMA

Abstract:Importance: Patients hospitalized for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations have high rehospitalization rates and reduced quality of life. Objective: To evaluate a hospital-initiated program that combined transition and long-term self-management support for patients hospitalized due to COPD and their family caregivers. Design, setting, and participants: This single-site randomized clinical trial was conducted in Baltimore, Maryland, with 240 participants. Participants were patients hospitalized due to COPD, randomized to intervention or usual care, and followed up for 6 months after hospital discharge. Enrollment occurred from March 2015 to May 2016; follow-up ended in December 2016. Interventions: The intervention (n = 120) was a comprehensive 3-month program to help patients and their family caregivers with long-term self-management of COPD. It was delivered by COPD nurses (nurses with special training on supporting patients with COPD using standardized tools). Usual care (n = 120) included transition support for 30 days after discharge to ensure adherence to discharge plan and connection to outpatient care. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was number of COPD-related acute care events (hospitalizations and emergency department visits) per participant at 6 months. The co-primary outcome was change in participants' health-related quality of life measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at 6 months after discharge (score, 0 [best] to 100 [worst]; 4-point difference is clinically meaningful). Results: Among 240 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 64.9 [9.8] years; females, 61.7%), 203 (85%) completed the study. The mean (SD) baseline SGRQ score was 63.1 (19.9) in the intervention group and 62.6 (19.3) in the usual care group. The mean number of COPD-related acute care events per participant at 6 months was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.45-0.97) in the intervention group vs 1.40 (95% CI, 1.01-1.79) in the usual care group (difference, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.22 to 1.15]; P = .004). The mean change in participants' SGRQ total score at 6 months was -1.53 in the intervention and +5.44 in the usual care group (adjusted difference, -6.69 [95% CI, -12.97 to -0.40]; P = .04). During the study period, there were 15 deaths (intervention: 7; usual care: 8) and 337 hospitalizations (intervention: 135; usual care: 202). Conclusions and relevance: In a single-site randomized clinical trial of patients hospitalized due to COPD, a 3-month program that combined transition and long-term self-management support resulted in significantly fewer COPD-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits and better health-related quality of life at 6 months after discharge. Further research is needed to evaluate this intervention in other settings. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02036294.
The effects of a telehealth coping skills intervention on outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: primary results from the INSPIRE-II study

James A Blumenthal,Charles F Emery,Patrick J Smith,Francis J Keefe,Karen Welty-Wolf,Stephanie Mabe,Tereza Martinu,Julie J Johnson,Michael A Babyak,Virginia F O'Hayer,Philip T Diaz,Michael Durheim,Donald Baucom,Scott M Palmer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000101

Abstract:Objective: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and reduced quality of life (QoL). Novel interventions are needed to improve outcomes in COPD patients. The present study assessed the effects of a telephone-based coping skills intervention on psychological and somatic QoL and on the combined medical end point of COPD-related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality. Methods: We conducted a dual-site, randomized clinical trial with assessments at baseline and after 16 weeks of treatment. The study population comprised 326 outpatients with COPD aged 38 to 81 years, randomized to coping skills training (CST) or to COPD education (COPD-ED). Patients completed a battery of QoL instruments, pulmonary function tests, and functional measures and were followed up for up to 4.4 years to assess medical outcomes. Results: The CST group exhibited greater improvements in psychological QoL compared with controls (p = .001), including less depression (Cohen d = 0.22 [95% confidence interval, or CI = 0.08-0.36]) and anxiety (d = 0.17 [95% CI = 0.02-0.33]), and better overall mental health (d = 0.17 [95% CI = 0.03-0.32]), emotional role functioning (d = 0.29 [95% CI = 0.10-0.48]), vitality (d = 0.27 [95% CI = 0.11, 0.42]), and social functioning (d = 0.21 [95% CI = 0.03-0.38]). A significant baseline psychological QoL by treatment group interaction revealed that CST with lower QoL at baseline achieved even greater improvements in psychological QoL compared with COPD-ED. CST participants also exhibited greater improvements in somatic QoL (p = .042), including greater improvements in pulmonary QoL (d = 0.13 [95% CI = 0.01-0.24]), less fatigue (d = 0.34 [95% CI = 0.18-0.50]), and less shortness of breath (d = 0.11 [95% CI = -0.01 to 0.23]) and greater improvement in distance walked on the Six-Minute Walk test (d = 0.09 [95% CI = 0.01-0.16]). However, there was no significant difference in risk of time to COPD-related hospitalization or all-cause mortality between CST (34 events) and COPD-ED (32 events; p = 0.430). Conclusions: A telehealth CST intervention produced clinically meaningful improvements in QoL and functional capacity, but no overall improvement in risk of COPD-related hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00736268.
Quality Assessment of an Integrated Care Pathway Using Telemonitoring in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study

Cyrille Herkert,Jos Johannes Kraal,Rudolph Ferdinand Spee,Anouk Serier,Lidwien Graat-Verboom,Hareld Marijn Clemens Kemps

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/20571

2020-11-19

JMIR Research Protocols

Abstract:Background Chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often coexist and are associated with a high morbidity and reduced quality of life (QoL). Although these diseases share similarities in symptoms and clinical course, and exacerbations of both diseases often overlap, care pathways for both conditions are usually not integrated. This results in frequent outpatient consultations and suboptimal treatment during exacerbations, leading to frequent hospital admissions. Therefore, we propose an integrated care pathway for both diseases, using telemonitoring to detect deterioration at an early stage and a single case manager for both diseases. Objective This study aims to investigate whether an integrated care pathway using telemonitoring in patients with combined CHF and COPD results in a higher general health-related QoL (HRQoL) as compared with the traditional care pathways. Secondary end points include disease-specific HRQoL, level of self-management, patient satisfaction, compliance to the program, and cost-effectiveness. Methods This is a monocenter, prospective study using a quasi-experimental interrupted time series design. Thirty patients with combined CHF and COPD are included. The study period of 2.5 years per patient is divided into a preintervention phase (6 months) and a postintervention phase (2 years) in which end points are assessed. The intervention consists of an on-demand treatment strategy based on monitoring symptoms related to CHF/COPD and vital parameters (weight, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, temperature), which are uploaded on a digital platform. The monitoring frequency and the limit values of the measurements to detect abnormalities are determined individually. Monitoring is performed by a case manager, who has the opportunity for a daily multidisciplinary meeting with both the cardiologist and the pulmonologist. Routine appointments at the outpatient clinic are cancelled and replaced by telemonitoring-guided treatment. Results Following ethical approval of the study protocol, the first patient was included in May 2018. Inclusion is expected to be complete in May 2021. Conclusions This study is the first to evaluate the effects of a novel integrated care pathway using telemonitoring for patients with combined CHF and COPD. Unique to this study is the concept of remote on-demand disease management by a single case manager for both diseases, combined with multidisciplinary meetings. Moreover, modern telemonitoring technology is used instead of, rather than as an addition to, regular care. Trial Registration Netherlands Trial Register NL6741; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6741 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/20571
Quality Assessment of an Integrated Care Pathway Using Telemonitoring in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study (Preprint)

Cyrille Herkert,Jos Johannes Kraal,Rudolph Ferdinand Spee,Anouk Serier,Lidwien Graat-Verboom,Hareld Marijn Clemens Kemps

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.20571

2020-05-22

Abstract:BACKGROUND Chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often coexist and are associated with a high morbidity and reduced quality of life (QoL). Although these diseases share similarities in symptoms and clinical course, and exacerbations of both diseases often overlap, care pathways for both conditions are usually not integrated. This results in frequent outpatient consultations and suboptimal treatment during exacerbations, leading to frequent hospital admissions. Therefore, we propose an integrated care pathway for both diseases, using telemonitoring to detect deterioration at an early stage and a single case manager for both diseases. OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate whether an integrated care pathway using telemonitoring in patients with combined CHF and COPD results in a higher general health-related QoL (HRQoL) as compared with the traditional care pathways. Secondary end points include disease-specific HRQoL, level of self-management, patient satisfaction, compliance to the program, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS This is a monocenter, prospective study using a quasi-experimental interrupted time series design. Thirty patients with combined CHF and COPD are included. The study period of 2.5 years per patient is divided into a preintervention phase (6 months) and a postintervention phase (2 years) in which end points are assessed. The intervention consists of an on-demand treatment strategy based on monitoring symptoms related to CHF/COPD and vital parameters (weight, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, temperature), which are uploaded on a digital platform. The monitoring frequency and the limit values of the measurements to detect abnormalities are determined individually. Monitoring is performed by a case manager, who has the opportunity for a daily multidisciplinary meeting with both the cardiologist and the pulmonologist. Routine appointments at the outpatient clinic are cancelled and replaced by telemonitoring-guided treatment. RESULTS Following ethical approval of the study protocol, the first patient was included in May 2018. Inclusion is expected to be complete in May 2021. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to evaluate the effects of a novel integrated care pathway using telemonitoring for patients with combined CHF and COPD. Unique to this study is the concept of remote on-demand disease management by a single case manager for both diseases, combined with multidisciplinary meetings. Moreover, modern telemonitoring technology is used instead of, rather than as an addition to, regular care. CLINICALTRIAL Netherlands Trial Register NL6741; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6741 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/20571
Nurse-Led, Telephone-Based Primary Palliative Care Intervention for Patients With Lung Cancer: Domains of Quality Care

Reinke,Lynn F.; Tartaglione,Erica V.; Ruedebusch,Susan; Smith,Patti H.; Sullivan,Donald R.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/njh.0000000000001021

2024-03-07

Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing

Abstract:Palliative care is traditionally delivered by specialty-trained palliative care teams. Because of a national workforce shortage of palliative care specialists, there is an urgent need to explore alternative models of palliative care delivery to meet the needs of patients living with serious illness. As part of a multisite randomized controlled trial, 2 registered nurses without previous palliative care experience were trained to deliver a primary palliative care intervention to patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. The intervention focused on assessing and managing symptoms, psychosocial needs, education, and initiating goals-of-care discussions. The primary outcome, improved symptom burden and quality of life, was not statistically significant. Despite this finding, nurses addressed 5 of the 8 National Consensus Project Guidelines domains of quality palliative care: structure and processes of care; physical, psychological, and social aspects of care; and ethical and legal aspects. Patients' engagement in goals-of-care discussions, a measure of high-quality palliative care, increased. Clinical recommendations offered by the nurses to the patients' clinicians were addressed and accepted on a timely basis. Most patients rated satisfaction with the intervention as "very or extremely" satisfied. These findings may inform future nurse-led palliative care interventions on the specific quality domains of palliative care.

nursing
Engagement, Advance Care Planning, and Hospice Use in a Telephonic Nurse-Led Palliative Care Program for Persons Living with Advanced Cancer

Rebecca Liddicoat Yamarik,Laraine Ann Chiu,Mara Flannery,Kaitlyn Van Allen,Oluwaseun Adeyemi,Allison M. Cuthel,Abraham A. Brody,Keith S. Goldfeld,Deborah Schrag,Corita R. Grudzen,on behalf of the EMPallA Investigators on behalf of the EMPallA Investigators

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082310

2023-04-16

Cancers

Abstract:Persons living with advanced cancer have intensive symptoms and psychosocial needs that often result in visits to the Emergency Department (ED). We report on program engagement, advance care planning (ACP), and hospice use for a 6-month longitudinal nurse-led, telephonic palliative care intervention for patients with advanced cancer as part of a larger randomized trial. Patients 50 years and older with metastatic solid tumors were recruited from 18 EDs and randomized to receive nursing calls focused on ACP, symptom management, and care coordination or specialty outpatient palliative care (ClinicialTrials.gov: NCT03325985). One hundred and five (50%) graduated from the 6-month program, 54 (26%) died or enrolled in hospice, 40 (19%) were lost to follow-up, and 19 (9%) withdrew prior to program completion. In a Cox proportional hazard regression, withdrawn subjects were more likely to be white and have a low symptom burden compared to those who did not withdraw. Two hundred eighteen persons living with advanced cancer were enrolled in the nursing arm, and 182 of those (83%) completed some ACP. Of the subjects who died, 43/54 (80%) enrolled in hospice. Our program demonstrated high rates of engagement, ACP, and hospice enrollment. Enrolling subjects with a high symptom burden may result in even greater program engagement.

oncology
A randomized controlled trial of a novel home‐based palliative care program: A report of a trial that could not be completed

Nathan E. Goldstein,Shira Winter,Harriet Mather,Linda V. DeCherrie,Amy S. Kelley,Karen McKendrick,Duzhi Zhao,Christian Espino,LaToya Sealy,Meng Zhang,R. Sean Morrison

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19022

2024-06-02

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract:Background In response to a growing need for accessible, efficient, and effective palliative care services, we designed, implemented, and evaluated a novel palliative care at home (PC@H) model for people with serious illness that is centered around a community health worker, a registered nurse, and a social worker, with an advanced practice nurse and a physician for support. Our objectives were to measure the impact of receipt of PC@H on patient symptoms, quality of life, and healthcare utilization and costs. Methods We enrolled 136 patients with serious illness in this parallel, randomized controlled trial. Our primary outcome was change in symptom burden at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included change in symptom burden at 3 months, change in quality of life at 6 weeks and 3 months, estimated using a group t‐test. In an exploratory aim, we examined the impact of PC@H on healthcare utilization and cost using a generalized linear model. Results PC@H resulted in a greater improvement in patient symptoms at 6 weeks (1.30 score improvement, n = 37) and 3 months (3.14 score improvement, n = 21) compared with controls. There were no differences in healthcare utilization and costs between the two groups. Unfortunately, due to the COVID‐19 pandemic and a loss of funding, the trial was not able to be completed as originally intended. Conclusions A palliative care at home model that leverages community health workers, registered nurses, and social workers as the primary deliverers of care may result in improved patient symptoms and quality of life compared with standard care. We did not demonstrate significant differences in healthcare utilization and cost associated with receipt of PC@H, likely due to inability to reach the intended sample size and insufficient statistical power, due to elements beyond the investigators' control such as the COVID‐19 public health emergency and changes in grant funding.

geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
Integrating Palliative Care Social Workers into Subacute Settings: Feasibility of the Assessing & Listening to Individual Goals and Needs Intervention Trial.

A. Plata,S. Fischer,Mary Mancuso,Ellie Jensen,C. Ross,L. Tropeano,A. Melnyk,W. Gozansky,Erin Nielsen,Dana Lahoff,B. Owens,M. Golub,Melanie L. Drace,J. Retrum

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2020.0322

2020-11-12

Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract:Objectives: Determine feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the Palliative Care Social Worker-led ALIGN (Assessing & Listening to Individual Goals and Needs) intervention in older persons admitted to Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) and their caregivers. Design: A pilot pragmatic randomized stepped wedge design of ALIGN versus usual care in three SNFs. Setting and Participants: One hundred and twenty older adults and caregivers (optional) with advanced medical illnesses. Measures: Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. We collected exploratory patient-/caregiver-centered outcomes at baseline and three months and conducted a medical record review at six months to assess documentation of Advance Directives (AD). We also collected exploratory health care utilization data, including hospitalizations, mortality, and hospice utilization. Results: Of 179 patients approached, 120 enrolled (60 ALIGN patients with 15 caregivers and 60 usual care patients and 21 caregivers). Four intervention patients refused ALIGN visits, 8 patients died or discharged before initial visit, and 48 intervention patients received ALIGN visits, with ∼80% having caregivers participating in visits, regardless of caregiver study enrollment. Quantitative exploratory outcomes were not powered to detect a difference between groups. We found 91% of ALIGN patients had a completed AD in medical record compared to 39.6% of usual care patients (p < 0.001). Qualitative feedback from participants and SNF staff supported high acceptability and satisfaction with ALIGN. Conclusion and Clinical Implications: A pragmatic trial of the ALIGN intervention is feasible and preliminary effects suggest ALIGN is effective in increasing AD documentation. Further research is warranted to understand effects on caregivers and health care utilization. The current model for SNF does not address the palliative care needs of patients. ALIGN has potential to be an effective, scalable, acceptable, and reproducible intervention to improve certain palliative care outcomes within subacute settings.

Medicine
Effect of a Collaborative Care Intervention vs Usual Care on Health Status of Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: The CASA Randomized Clinical Trial

David B Bekelman,Larry A Allen,Connor F McBryde,Brack Hattler,Diane L Fairclough,Edward P Havranek,Carolyn Turvey,Paula M Meek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8667

2018-04-01

Abstract:Importance: Many patients with chronic heart failure experience reduced health status despite receiving conventional therapy. Objective: To determine whether a symptom and psychosocial collaborative care intervention improves heart failure-specific health status, depression, and symptom burden in patients with heart failure. Design, setting, and participants: A single-blind, 2-arm, multisite randomized clinical trial was conducted at Veterans Affairs, academic, and safety-net health systems in Colorado among outpatients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced health status recruited between August 2012 and April 2015. Data from all participants were included regardless of level of participation, using an intent-to-treat approach. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive the Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness (CASA) intervention or usual care. The CASA intervention included collaborative symptom care provided by a nurse and psychosocial care provided by a social worker, both of whom worked with the patients' primary care clinicians and were supervised by a study primary care clinician, cardiologist, and palliative care physician. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was patient-reported heart failure-specific health status, measured by difference in change scores on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (range, 0-100) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included depression (measured by the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire), anxiety (measured by the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire), overall symptom distress (measured by the General Symptom Distress Scale), specific symptoms (pain, fatigue, and shortness of breath), number of hospitalizations, and mortality. Results: Of 314 patients randomized (157 to intervention arm and 157 to control arm), there were 67 women and 247 men, mean (SD) age was 65.5 (11.4) years, and 178 (56.7%) had reduced ejection fraction. At 6 months, the mean Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score improved 5.5 points in the intervention arm and 2.9 points in the control arm (difference, 2.6; 95% CI, -1.3 to 6.6; P = .19). Among secondary outcomes, depressive symptoms and fatigue improved at 6 months with CASA (effect size of -0.29 [95% CI, -0.53 to -0.04] for depressive symptoms and -0.30 [95% CI, -0.55 to -0.06] for fatigue; P = .02 for both). There were no significant changes in overall symptom distress, pain, shortness of breath, or number of hospitalizations. Mortality at 12 months was similar in both arms (10 patients died receiving CASA, and 13 patients died receiving usual care; P = .52). Conclusions and relevance: This multisite randomized clinical trial of the CASA intervention did not demonstrate improved heart failure-specific health status. Secondary outcomes of depression and fatigue, both difficult symptoms to treat in heart failure, improved. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01739686.
An App Platform-Facilitated Collaborative Palliative Care Intervention for Outpatients With Interstitial Lung Disease: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Jessie Gu,Peijin Wang,Shein-Chung Chow,Katelyn Dempsey,Santos Bermejo,Aparna Swaminathan,Alyssa Soskis,Julie Fried,Chad Kloefkorn,Christopher Jones,Christopher E Cox

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241275966

2024-08-19

Abstract:Rationale: Outpatients with interstitial lung disease often experience serious symptoms, yet infrequently receive palliative care. Objective: To determine the feasibility and clinical impact of a mobile application (PCplanner) in an outpatient setting. Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial among adults with interstitial lung disease in a single-center academic clinic. Clinical outcomes included change in Needs at the End-of-Life Screening Tool (NEST) scale between baseline and 3 months as well as frequency of advance care planning discussions and referrals to palliative care services. Results: Observed feasibility outcomes were similar to targeted benchmarks including randomization rates (82.1% vs 80%) and retention (84.8% vs 80%). Mean NEST scores between the intervention and control group were 38.9 (SD, 18.9) vs 41.5 (SD, 20.5) at baseline, 34.6 (SD, 18.9) vs 33.6 (SD, 19.4) at 1 month after clinic visit, 40.5 (SD, 21.6) vs 35.3 (SD, 25.0) at 3 months after clinic visit. Changes in NEST scores between baseline and 3 months showed no difference in the primary outcome (P = 0.481, 95% CI [-8.45, 17.62]). Conclusion: Among patients with interstitial lung disease, a mobile app designed to focus patients and clinicians on palliative care principles demonstrated evidence of feasibility. Although changes in self-reported needs were similar between intervention and control groups, more patients in the intervention group updated their advance directives and code status compared to the control group. Clinical Trial Registration: Palliative Care Planner (PCplanner) NCT05095363. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05095363.
Nurse Telephone Support for Caregivers of Older Adults at Hospital Discharge: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Anne-Marie Hill,Wendy Moyle,Susan Slatyer,Christina Bryant,Keith D Hill,Nicholas Waldron,Samar Aoun,Ami Kamdar,Laurie Grealish,Caroline Reberger,Cindy Jones,Mary Bronson,Max K Bulsara,Angela Jacques,Cheng Yen Loo,Sean Maher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41019

2024-10-01

Abstract:Importance: Informal caregivers who provide home-based care frequently experience stress and burden that adversely affect their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the Further Enabling Care at Home (FECH+) program for the HRQOL of caregivers of older adults discharged home from the hospital. Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter, parallel, 2-group randomized clinical trial, with blinded baseline and outcome measurements, was conducted at 3 hospitals in 2 states in Australia. Recruitment took place between August 2020 and July 2022, and follow-up was performed for 12 months after hospital discharge. Participants were dyads of caregivers and patients. Eligible caregivers were aged 18 years or older who provided informal home-based care at least weekly for a patient aged 70 years or older. Caregivers were enrolled when their patient was discharged from the hospital. Dyads were randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. Data analysis followed an intention-to-treat approach. Intervention: Caregivers in the intervention group received the FECH+ program, structured nurse support of 6 telephone calls over 6 months after the patient's discharge plus usual discharge care. Caregivers in the control group received usual care alone. Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome was caregivers' HRQOL 6 months after discharge, which was measured using the Assessment of Quality of Life 8-Dimension (AQOL-8D). Secondary outcomes were caregivers' HRQOL 12 months after discharge as well as preparedness to care (measured using the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale), self-efficacy (measured using the Caregiver Inventory), and levels of strain and distress (measured using the Family Appraisal of Caregiving Questionnaire) at 6 and 12 months after discharge. Baseline and outcome measurements were administered by telephone at 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge. Results: A total of 547 dyads (caregivers: 405 females [74.0%], mean [SD] age, 64.50 [12.82] years; patients: 296 females [54.1%], mean [SD] age, 83.16 [7.04] years for the intervention group and 83.45 [7.20] years for the control group) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. There was no significant difference in caregivers' HRQOL between the 2 groups at the primary time point of 6 months (difference in AQOL-8D score, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03; P = .62) after hospital discharge. Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the FECH+ program-a nurse telephone support intervention for caregivers of older adults after hospital discharge-did not significantly improve caregivers' HRQOL at 6 months after discharge compared with usual care. Additional examination is warranted into improving caregivers' HRQOL at the time of their patient's hospital discharge. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12620000060943.
Comparative effectiveness trial of early palliative care delivered via telehealth versus in person among patients with advanced lung cancer.

Joseph A. Greer,Chardria Trotter,Vicki Jackson,Simone Rinaldi,Mihir Kamdar,Areej El-Jawahri,Nora K. Horick,Kedie Pintro,Dustin Rabideau,Josephine Louella Feliciano,Isaac S. Chua,Konstantinos Leventakos,Stacy Fischer,Toby Christopher Campbell,Michael W. Rabow,Finly Zachariah,Laura C. Hanson,Sara F. Martin,Maria Silveira,Jennifer S. Temel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba3

IF: 45.3

2024-06-06

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:LBA3 Background: National guidelines recommend the early integration of palliative and oncology care for patients with advanced cancer, given robust evidence showing that this care model improves quality of life (QOL) and other important outcomes. However, most patients do not receive early palliative care (EPC) in the outpatient setting due to limited access and resources. To overcome these barriers, we conducted a large-scale comparative effectiveness trial of EPC delivered via secure video versus in person among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and their caregivers. Methods: Between 6/14/2018 and 5/4/2023, we enrolled 1250 patients with advanced NSCLC, diagnosed in the past 12 weeks, into a randomized trial of telehealth versus in-person EPC across 22 cancer centers in the US. Patients were randomly assigned to meet with a palliative care clinician every four weeks from enrollment through the course of disease either via video or in the outpatient clinic. Participants completed self-report measures at baseline and weeks 12 and 24. The primary aim was to evaluate the equivalence of the effect of telehealth versus in-person EPC on QOL at week 24, using regression modeling with an equivalence margin of ±4 points on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L, range = 0-136). We also compared rates of caregiver participation in EPC visits and patient-reported depression and anxiety symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), coping (Brief COPE), and perceptions of prognosis (Perceptions of Treatment and Prognosis Questionnaire) between groups. Study recruitment ceased for two months at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Participants (mean age = 65.5 years; 54.0% female; 82.1% White) had a mean of 4.75 and 4.92 palliative care encounters by week 24 in the telehealth and in-person groups, respectively. Due to the pandemic, the in-person group had 3.9% of visits occur via video. QOL scores at week 24 for patients assigned to the telehealth group were equivalent to those receiving in-person EPC (adjusted means: 99.67 versus 97.67, p < 0.043 for equivalence). The rate of caregiver participation in EPC visits was lower in the telehealth versus in-person group (36.6% versus 49.7%, p < 0.0001). Study groups did not differ in depression and anxiety symptoms, use of coping skills, or perceptions of the goal of treatment and curability of their cancer. Conclusions: The delivery of EPC via video versus in-person visits demonstrated equivalent effects on QOL in patients with advanced NSCLC. The two modalities also did not differ across a range of patient-reported outcomes, though caregivers attended more in-person versus video visits. The findings underscore the considerable potential for improving access to and broader dissemination of this evidence-based care model through telehealth delivery. Clinical trial information: NCT03375489 .

oncology
Transforming the Design Process

J. Stichler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/193758670800100307

2008-04-01

HERD

Abstract:This issue of HERD features papers developed from research efforts funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). The generous contributions of the RWJF have contributed greatly to the advancement of evidence-based healthcare design and the evaluation of design features that have the potential to improve work environments for healthcare providers and healing environments for patients, their families, and providers. These multidisciplinary group projects have contributed to the body of knowledge about workplace redesign and ergonomic improvements that enhance patient and provider safety, improve the patient and family experience, and enhance nurse and staff working conditions. Still, there is much work to be done to evaluate the effect of specific design features such as "single-handed" patient rooms on patient outcomes; decentralized work stations on provider interaction; respite rooms on nurse and staff stress levels; or patient care unit design on nurse physical and emotional stress, fatigue, and response times. While all of us appreciate working in a new, up-todate, and beautiful environment, it is critical that we examine how new hospitals affect organizational culture and performance, and ultimately how they affect the quality of patient care.The mission of HERD is to disseminate research findings and expert opinion papers related to the effect of facility design on organizational culture and performance measures and on the patient and provider experience. The aim of HERD is to advance the emerging science of evidence-based healthcare design by encouraging both qualitative and quantitative research for design projects and the use of research findings to guide decisions during the design process. In essence, HERD can be an important vehicle in helping move the design process toward an interdisciplinary approach that uses sound evidence to guide important design decisions relative to the healthcare environment and the patient care delivery process.All research begins with asking a fundamental question: What is the effect of a specific design feature on desired outcomes? For example, "What is the optimal number of acute care (medical-surgical) rooms on a patient unit to maximize staff efficiency and minimize staff walking distances between support and report areas and the point of patient care services?" Needless to say, there are thousands of cogent questions that need to be researched and an equal number of unsubstantiated beliefs and opinions about the answers to these questions. …
Health coaching to improve self-management and quality of life for low income patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Beatrice Huang,Rachel Willard-Grace,Denise De Vore,Jessica Wolf,Chris Chirinos,Stephanie Tsao,Danielle Hessler,George Su,David H. Thom

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-017-0433-3

IF: 3.1

2017-06-09

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Abstract:BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severely hinders quality of life for those affected and is costly to the health care system. Care gaps in areas such as pharmacotherapy, inhaler technique, and knowledge of disease are prevalent, particularly for vulnerable populations served by community clinics. Non-professionally licensed health coaches have been shown to be an effective and cost-efficient solution in bridging care gaps and facilitating self-management for patients with other chronic diseases, but no research to date has explored their efficacy in improving care for people living with COPD.MethodThis is multi-site, single blinded, randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy of health coaches to facilitate patient self-management of disease and improve quality of life for patients with moderate to severe COPD. Spirometry, survey, and an exercise capacity test are conducted at baseline and at 9 months. A short survey is administered by phone at 3 and 6 months post-enrollment. The nine month health coaching intervention focuses on enhancing disease understanding and symptom awareness, improving use of inhalers; making personalized plans to increase physical activity, smoking cessation, or otherwise improve disease management; and facilitating care coordination.DiscussionThe results of this study will provide evidence regarding the efficacy and feasibility of health coaching to improve self-management and quality of life for urban underserved patients with moderate to severe COPD.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02234284. Registered 12 August 2014.

respiratory system
Identifying priority challenges of older adults with COPD: A multiphase intervention refinement study

Anand S Iyer,Rachel D Wells,Avery C Bechthold,Margaret Armstrong,Ronan O'Beirne,Jun Y Byun,Jazmine Coffee-Dunning,J Nicholas Odom,Russell G Buhr,Angela O Suen,Ashwin A Kotwal,Leah J Witt,Cynthia J Brown,Mark T Dransfield,Marie A Bakitas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19158

2024-08-31

Abstract:Background: Identifying priority challenges of older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is critical to designing interventions aimed at improving their well-being and independence. Objective: To prioritize challenges of older adults with COPD and those who care for them to guide refinement of a telephonic nurse coach intervention for patients with COPD and their family caregivers (EPIC: Empowering People to Independence in COPD). Design: Multiphase study guided by Baltes Theory of Successful Aging and the 5Ms Framework: Phase 1: Nominal group technique (NGT), a structured process of prioritizing responses to a question through group consensus. Phase 2: Rapid qualitative analysis. Phase 3: Intervention mapping and refinement. Setting: Ambulatory, virtual. Participants: Older adults with COPD, family caregivers, clinic staff (nurses, respiratory therapists), clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners), and health system leaders. Results: NGT sessions were conducted by constituency group with 37 participants (n = 7 patients, n = 6 family caregivers, n = 8 clinic staff, n = 9 clinicians, n = 7 health system leaders) (Phase 1). Participants generated 92 statements across five themes (Phase 2): (1) "Barriers to care", (2) "Family caregiver needs", (3) "Functional status and mobility issues", (4) "Illness understanding", and (5) "COPD care complexities". Supplemental oxygen challenges emerged as a critical problem, and prioritized challenges differed by group. Patients and clinic staff prioritized "Functional status and mobility issues", family caregivers prioritized "Family caregiver needs", and clinicians and health system leaders prioritized "COPD care complexities". Intervention mapping (Phase 3) guided EPIC refinement focused on meeting patient priorities of independence and mobility but accounting for all priorities. Conclusions: Diverse constituency groups identified priority challenges for older adults with COPD. Functional status and mobility issues, particularly related to supplemental oxygen, emerged as patient prioritized challenges. Implications: Patient-centered interventions for older adults with COPD must account for their prioritized functional and supplemental oxygen needs and explore diverse constituent perspectives to facilitate intervention enrichment.

THE MATURATION OF NORMAL GRANULOCYTOPOIESIS IN VITRO COMPARED WITH THAT OF CHRONIC MYELOCYTIC LEUKEMIA.

Effects of Telephone Support on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Meta-Analysis

[Carbon monoxide poisoning in children. A cause of seizures].

Project EPIC (Empowering People to Independence in COPD): Study protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot randomized controlled trial of telephonic, geriatrics-palliative care nurse-coaching in older adults with COPD and their family caregivers

Telehealth vs In-Person Early Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial

Effect of a Hospital-Initiated Program Combining Transitional Care and Long-term Self-management Support on Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Effect of a Program Combining Transitional Care and Long-term Self-management Support on Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The effects of a telehealth coping skills intervention on outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: primary results from the INSPIRE-II study

Quality Assessment of an Integrated Care Pathway Using Telemonitoring in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study

Quality Assessment of an Integrated Care Pathway Using Telemonitoring in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study (Preprint)

Nurse-Led, Telephone-Based Primary Palliative Care Intervention for Patients With Lung Cancer: Domains of Quality Care

Engagement, Advance Care Planning, and Hospice Use in a Telephonic Nurse-Led Palliative Care Program for Persons Living with Advanced Cancer

A randomized controlled trial of a novel home‐based palliative care program: A report of a trial that could not be completed

Integrating Palliative Care Social Workers into Subacute Settings: Feasibility of the Assessing & Listening to Individual Goals and Needs Intervention Trial.

Effect of a Collaborative Care Intervention vs Usual Care on Health Status of Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: The CASA Randomized Clinical Trial

An App Platform-Facilitated Collaborative Palliative Care Intervention for Outpatients With Interstitial Lung Disease: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Nurse Telephone Support for Caregivers of Older Adults at Hospital Discharge: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Comparative effectiveness trial of early palliative care delivered via telehealth versus in person among patients with advanced lung cancer.

Transforming the Design Process

Health coaching to improve self-management and quality of life for low income patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Identifying priority challenges of older adults with COPD: A multiphase intervention refinement study