Abstract:Embryonic development is driven by spatial patterns of gene expression that determine the fate of each cell in the embryo. While gene expression is often highly erratic, embryonic development is usually exceedingly precise. In particular, gene expression boundaries are robust not only against intra-embryonic fluctuations such as noise in gene expression and protein diffusion, but also against embryo-to-embryo variations in the morphogen gradients, which provide positional information to the differentiating cells. How development is robust against intra- and inter-embryonic variations is not understood. A common motif in the gene regulation networks that control embryonic development is mutual repression between pairs of genes. To assess the role of mutual repression in the robust formation of gene expression patterns, we have performed large-scale stochastic simulations of a minimal model of two mutually repressing gap genes in Drosophila, hunchback (hb) and knirps (kni). Our model includes not only mutual repression between hb and kni, but also the stochastic and cooperative activation of hb by the anterior morphogen Bicoid (Bcd) and of kni by the posterior morphogen Caudal (Cad), as well as the diffusion of Hb and Kni between neighboring nuclei. Our analysis reveals that mutual repression can markedly increase the steepness and precision of the gap gene expression boundaries. In contrast to other mechanisms such as spatial averaging and cooperative gene activation, mutual repression thus allows for gene-expression boundaries that are both steep and precise. Moreover, mutual repression dramatically enhances their robustness against embryo-to-embryo variations in the morphogen levels. Finally, our simulations reveal that diffusion of the gap proteins plays a critical role not only in reducing the width of the gap gene expression boundaries via the mechanism of spatial averaging, but also in repairing patterning errors that could arise because of the bistability induced by mutual repression.

Quantifying robustness of the gap gene network

Single Cell RNA-seq Analysis Reveals Temporally-Regulated and Quiescence-Regulated Gene Expression in Drosophila Larval Neuroblasts

Modeling of gap gene regulatory networks in Drosophila with the account of the gene modular structure (in Russian)

Robustness under Functional Constraint: The Genetic Network for Temporal Expression in Drosophila Neurogenesis

Mutual Repression Enhances the Steepness and Precision of Gene Expression Boundaries

Calibration and validation of a genetic regulatory network model describing the production of the gap gene protein Hunchback in \emph{Drosophila} early development

A network characteristic that correlates environmental and genetic robustness

Emergent thresholds in genetic regulatory networks: Protein patterning in Drosophila morphogenesis

UC San Francisco UC San Francisco Previously Published Works Title Robustness and modular design of the Drosophila segment polarity network

Morphogenesis at criticality?

Steady‐state Robustness of Qualitative Gene Regulation Networks

Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks

Body plan evolvability: The role of variability in gene regulatory networks

Methods of robustness analysis for Boolean models of gene control networks

Robustness and Modular Design of the Drosophila Segment Polarity Network

Gene regulatory network structure informs the distribution of perturbation effects

Deriving a genetic regulatory network from an optimization principle

Gene network robustness as a multivariate character

Robust Regulatory Networks

Physically-Inspired Gaussian Process Models for Post-Transcriptional Regulation in Drosophila

Inferring network mechanisms: The Drosophila melanogaster protein interaction network