Mapping the landscape of HPV integration and characterising virus and host genome interactions in HPV‐positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
Shengming Xu,Chaoji Shi,Rong Zhou,Yong Han,NianNian Li,Chuxiang Qu,Ronghui Xia,Chunye Zhang,Yuhua Hu,Zhen Tian,Shuli Liu,Lizhen Wang,Jiang Li,Zhiyuan Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.1556
IF: 8.554
2024-01-28
Clinical and Translational Medicine
Abstract:Viral breaking and integrating into the host genome were characterised, and integration hot spot genes were identified. We characterised virus–host interactions and identified genes with co‐occurrence of CNVs or dysregulated expression and HPV integration. Our observation supports viral integration exerts effects on genomic aberrations and host gene expression disruption, facilitate the shaping of distinct molecular features and tumour microenvironment of HPV(+)OPSCC. Background Human papillomavirus (HPV) integration into the host genome is an important factor in HPV(+)OPSCC carcinogenesis, in conjunction with HPV oncoproteins E6/E7. However, a well‐studied investigation about virus–host interaction still needs to be completed. Our objective is to characterise HPV integration to investigate potential mechanisms of tumourigenesis independent of E6/E7 oncoproteins. Materials and methods High‐throughput viral integration detection was performed on 109 HPV(+)OPSCC tumours with relevant clinicopathological information. Of these tumours, 38 tumours underwent targeted gene sequencing, 29 underwent whole exome sequencing and 26 underwent RNA sequencing. Results HPV integration was detected in 94% of tumours (with a mean integration count of 337). Tumours occurring at the tonsil/oropharyngeal wall that exhibit higher PD‐L1 expression demonstrated increased integration sites (p = .024). HPV exhibited a propensity for integration at genomic sites located within specific fragile sites (FRA19A) or genes associated with functional roles such as cell proliferation and differentiation (PTEN, AR), immune evasion (CD274) and glycoprotein biosynthesis process (FUT8). The viral oncogenes E2, E4, E6 and E7 tended to remain intact. HPV fragments displayed enrichment within host copy number variation (CNV) regions. However, insertions into genes related to altered homologous recombination repair were infrequent. Genes with integration had distinct expression levels. Fifty‐nine genes whose expression level was affected by viral integration were identified, for example, EPHB1, which was reported to be involved in cellular protein metabolic process. Conclusions HPV can promote oncogenesis through recurrent integration into functional host genome regions, leading to subsequent genomic aberrations and gene expression disruption. This study characterises viral integrations and virus–host interactions, enhancing our understanding of HPV‐related carcinogenesis mechanisms.
oncology,medicine, research & experimental