Commentary: Endovascular Repair of Postdissection Aneurysms Involving the Thoracoabdominal Aorta

S. Haulon,D. Fabre,J. Sobocinski,R. Clough

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602816679333

IF: 2.6

2017-02-01

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Abstract:We would like to congratulate Xiong and colleagues for reporting an innovative technique that allowed the successful treatment of a complex thoracoabdominal aortic dissection (TAAD) in an acute setting. This case confirms that thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of acute or chronic dissection does not always promote aortic remodeling; rather, remodeling is often limited to the level of the endograft. TEVAR should thus be carefully considered, as it may not prevent further aortic growth, and it is associated with significant risks, such as stroke and spinal cord ischemia. Nonetheless, it is our first line therapy in patients with life-threatening complications, such as rupture, malperfusion in acute cases, and significant aneurysmal dilatation of the false lumen in chronic cases. After TEVAR, the endograft’s distal edge can tear the flap and create a stent-graft–induced new entry (SINE). This will increase the flow in the false lumen, resulting in high pressure and aneurysmal evolution, as was seen in this case. We see many patients in our clinic with TAAD and aneurysmal evolution after TEVAR for type B dissection and chose to treat them in this non-acute setting using custom-made fenestrated and/or branched endografts. The 6-week manufacturing delay in this context is not an issue. We favor fenestrated (Figure 1) over branched devices because the latter is associated with prolonged access through the aortic arch, and in a narrow true lumen there may be a conflict between the branches and the aortic endograft. It is worth noting, however, that the true lumen often changes configuration at the end of the procedure once all communications between true and false lumens have been covered by the endograft, resulting in depressurization of the false lumen; the true lumen configuration transforms from a French croissant to an American donut instantly once the false lumen is no longer pressurized. Connecting the origin of target vessels located in the false lumen to their respective fenestrations can be challenging and at times impossible. A tear in the dissection flap is almost always depicted at the level of the target vessel origin, and we therefore design the endograft (implanted in the true lumen) with the fenestration positioned in front of the tear. The case described by Xiong et al is rare because the communications between the true and false lumens at the level of the visceral aorta had sealed. The large entry tear above diverted the majority of the flow to the false lumen, which supplied the celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery (dual supply with true lumen), and left renal artery. In cases such as these, we have occasionally used a similar approach, with branches positioned above the large entry tear that are then connected to the visceral target vessels perfused by the false lumen with numerous and long bridging stents (Figure 2). The long-term patency of these very long branches is, however, questionable. In Xiong et al, the images in Figure 2B and C show thrombus formation and compression of the branches. It is of paramount importance to understand that the technique described by Xiong et al had a favorable outcome only because the communications between the lumens had sealed following creation of the large entry tear by the distal edge of the thoracic endograft. In most cases, the false lumen would have been perfused and pressurized through the entry tears located at the level of the visceral aorta, and the patient would have remained at risk of 679333 JETXXX10.1177/1526602816679333Journal of Endovascular TherapyHaulon et al research-article2016