A phase 2, multicenter, open-label study of anti-LAG-3 ieramilimab in combination with anti-PD-1 spartalizumab in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Chia-Chi Lin,Elena Garralda,Patrick Schöffski,David S Hong,Lillian L Siu,Miguel Martin,Michela Maur,Rina Hui,Ross A Soo,Joanne Chiu,Tian Zhang,Brigette Ma,Chrisann Kyi,Daniel Sw Tan,Philippe A Cassier,John Sarantopoulos,Andrew Weickhardt,Richard D Carvajal,Jennifer Spratlin,Taito Esaki,Fréderic Rolland,Wallace Akerley,Barbara Deschler-Baier,Lawrence Rispoli,Tanay S Samant,Niladri Roy Chowdhury,Daniel Gusenleitner,Eunice L Kwak,Vasileios Askoxylakis,Filippo De Braud
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2023.2290787
2023-12-20
OncoImmunology
Abstract:Ieramilimab, a humanized anti-LAG-3 monoclonal antibody, was well tolerated in combination with the anti-PD-1 antibody spartalizumab in a phase 1 study. This phase 2 study aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of combination treatment in patients with selected advanced (locally advanced or metastatic) solid malignancies. Eligible patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), mesothelioma, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were grouped depending on prior anti-PD-1/L1 therapy (anti-PD-1/L1 naive or anti-PD-1/L1 pretreated). Patients received ieramilimab (400 mg) followed by spartalizumab (300 mg) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), along with safety, pharmacokinetics, and biomarker assessments. Of 235 patients, 142 were naive to anti-PD-1/L1 and 93 were pretreated with anti-PD-1/L1 antibodies. Durable responses (>24 months) were seen across all indications for patients naive to anti-PD-1/L1 and in melanoma and RCC patients pretreated with anti-PD1/L1. The most frequent study drug-related AEs were pruritus (15.5%), fatigue (10.6%), and rash (10.6%) in patients naive to anti-PD-1/L1 and fatigue (18.3%), rash (14.0%), and nausea (10.8%) in anti-PD-1/L1 pretreated patients. Biomarker assessment indicated higher expression of T-cell-inflamed gene signature at baseline among responding patients. Response to treatment was durable (>24 months) in some patients across all enrolled indications, and safety findings were in accordance with previous and current studies exploring LAG-3/PD-1 blockade.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?