Interaction between VEGF-A and immune checkpoint targets in triple-negative breast cancer and mechanisms of immune evasion and tumor progression.
R.J. Seager,Sarabjot Pabla,Shipra Gandhi,Maria-Fernanda Senosain,Hardik Parikh,Erik Van Roey,Shuang Gao,Yamuna Pulivendula,Paul DePietro,Mary K Nesline,Durga P. Dash,Jeffrey M Conroy,Stephanie B Hastings,Kyle C Strickland,Rebecca A. Previs,Eric A Severson,Brian Caveney,Taylor J. Jensen,Shakti H Ramkissoon,Heidi Chwan Ko
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.1096
IF: 45.3
2024-06-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:1096 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, not all patients with TNBC benefit from the addition of ICIs due to factors such as intrinsic and acquired resistance to ICIs, and complex interplay between tumor and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes angiogenesis and potentially modulates tumor immune evasion. A phase I clinical trial has shown that a bispecific antibody to VEGF-A and PD-L1 produces encouraging tumor responses in advanced TNBC. In this study, we investigated the interaction between VEGF and various immune gene expression signatures including PD-L1 in a real-world breast cancer patient population. Methods: Comprehensive immune profiling, including the RNA-seq based gene expression assessment of 395 immune-associated genes, was performed on 120 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast cancer samples. PD-L1 expression (Combined Positive Score, CPS ≥ 10%) was measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC; 22C3). Clinicopathologic variables were collected. Statistical associations between quantitative biomarkers, including 28 immune checkpoint genes, were calculated using Pearson correlations (r), and comparisons of quantitative biomarkers between groups were performed using the proportions test. For statistical significance, p<0.05 was required. Results: The study cohort included 29 patients (24.2%) with TNBC and 91 (75.2%) with non-TNBC (including ER+/HER2- and HER2+). Most patients had metastatic tumors (n=92, 76.7%) and invasive ductal carcinoma (n=83, 69.2%). Among the TNBC group, 21 patients had PD-L1 positive tumors (72.4%), defined by CPS ≥ 10.In non-TNBC, VEGF has significant, though weak (r 0.47) correlations with the expression of three other checkpoint genes: PD-1 (r=0.47, p=0.0094), PD-L1 (r=0.57, p=0.0012), and PIK3CA (r=0.6, p=0.00051) However, in TNBC, VEGF gene expression does not have a statistical association with PD-L1 IHC (CPS ≥/< 10 (p=0.9)). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that there is an interplay between angiogenesis and an immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment in TNBC to a greater degree than in non-TNBCs. This supports the notion that angiogenesis mediators such as VEGF-A may enhance the expression of immunosuppressive checkpoint molecules, leading to immune evasion and tumor progression. Combination treatments of ICIs, especially anti-PD-1 therapy, with VEGF antibodies may be promising approaches to enhance the immune responses in TNBC, especially in tumors with CPS<10, where the current frontline treatment is cytotoxic chemotherapy.
oncology