Abstract:The impact on clinical outcomes of patient selection using perfusion imaging for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting beyond 6 hours from onset remains undetermined in routine clinical practice. Patients from a national stroke registry that underwent EVT selected with or without perfusion imaging (noncontrast computed tomography/computed tomography angiography) in the early (<6 hours) and late (6–24 hours) time windows, between October 2015 and March 2020, were compared. The primary outcome was the ordinal shift in the modified Rankin Scale score at hospital discharge. Other outcomes included functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) and in-hospital mortality, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, successful reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b–3), early neurological deterioration, futile recanalization (modified Rankin Scale score 4–6 despite successful reperfusion) and procedural time metrics. Multivariable analyses were performed, adjusted for age, sex, baseline stroke severity, prestroke disability, intravenous thrombolysis, mode of anesthesia (Model 1) and including EVT technique, balloon guide catheter, and center (Model 2). We included 4249 patients, 3203 in the early window (593 with perfusion versus 2610 without perfusion) and 1046 in the late window (378 with perfusion versus 668 without perfusion). Within the late window, patients with perfusion imaging had a shift towards better functional outcome at discharge compared with those without perfusion imaging (adjusted common odds ratio [OR], 1.45 [95% CI, 1.16–1.83]; P =0.001). There was no significant difference in functional independence (29.3% with perfusion versus 24.8% without; P =0.210) or in the safety outcome measures of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage ( P =0.53) and in-hospital mortality (10.6% with perfusion versus 14.3% without; P =0.053). In the early time window, patients with perfusion imaging had significantly improved odds of functional outcome (adjusted common OR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.28–1.78]; P =0.0001) and functional independence (41.6% versus 33.6%, adjusted OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.08–1.59]; P =0.006). Perfusion imaging was associated with lower odds of futile recanalization in both time windows (late: adjusted OR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.50–0.97]; P =0.034; early: adjusted OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65–0.99]; P =0.047). In this real-world study, acquisition of perfusion imaging for EVT was associated with improvement in functional disability in the early and late time windows compared with nonperfusion neuroimaging. These indirect comparisons should be interpreted with caution while awaiting confirmatory data from prospective randomized trials. Download figure Download PowerPoint

Perfusion vs non-perfusion computed tomography imaging in the late window of emergent large vessel ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract WP248: Pre-treatment Perfusion CT in Stroke Thrombolysis Can Predict Disability-free Life

Too Good to Treat? Ischemic Stroke Patients with Small Computed Tomography Perfusion Lesions May Not Benefit from Thrombolysis

Clinical uncertainty in large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: does automated perfusion imaging make a difference? An intra-rater and inter-rater agreement study

Perfusion Imaging for Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Is Associated With Improved Functional Outcomes in the Early and Late Time Windows.

Clinical Uncertainty in Large Vessel Occlusion ischemic stroke (CULVO): Does automated perfusion scanning make a difference? Protocol of an intrarater and interrater agreement study

Perfusion Computed Tomography in Patients with Stroke Thrombolysis.

Endovascular Treatment for Minor Acute Ischemic Strokes with Large Vessel Occlusion

Brain imaging prior to thrombectomy in the late window of large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Endovascular Thrombectomy vs Best Medical Management for Late Presentation Acute Ischaemic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion Without CT Perfusion or MR Imaging Selection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simplified stroke imaging selection modality for endovascular thrombectomy in the extended time window: systematic review and meta-analysis

Noncontrast CT Selected Thrombectomy vs Medical Management for Late-Window Anterior Large Vessel Occlusion

Computed Tomography Perfusion Deficit as an Indicator for Reperfusion in Large-vessel Occlusions with Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Scores in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Retrospective Review

Late Window Imaging Selection for Endovascular Therapy of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: an International Survey

Impact of stroke imaging selection modality on endovascular thrombectomy outcomes in the early and extended time windows: A meta-analysis

Safety and clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy versus medical management in late presentation of large ischemic stroke

Abstract TP207: Endovascular Treatment in the Late Time Window: Strict Perfusion Imaging Screening Criteria in Case Selection

Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular treatment using different perfusion modalities: a real-world multicenter study

Prognostic importance of CT ASPECTS and CT perfusion measures of infarction in anterior emergent large vessel occlusions

Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke of large-vessel occlusion beyond the time window based on imaging evaluation

Association between time to treatment and clinical outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy beyond 6 hours without advanced imaging selection