Brain magnetic resonance imaging as predictors in pediatric anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis

Chi Hou,Xiaojing Li,Yiru Zeng,Yuanyuan Gao,Wenxiao Wu,Haixia Zhu,Yani Zhang,Wenlin Wu,Yang Tian,Kelu Zheng,Liangfeng Chen,Bingwei Peng,Wen-Xiong Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2023.105061
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the associations between brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes and clinical profiles in children with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis. Methods: Clinical data and brain MRI results of children diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis in Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center from October 2014 to June 2022 were retrospectively studied. Results: A total of 143 children (Male: female 54:89) were enrolled, with a mean onset age of 6.8 years (6.8 ± 3.1). 40.6 % (58/143) of patients had abnormal initial brain MRI. Lesions in temporal lobe (34.5 %, 20/58) and frontal lobe (25.9 %, 15/58) were relatively common. Children with abnormal initial brain MRI were prone to have fever (P = 0.023), dystonia (P = 0.037), positive MOG antibodies (P = 0.015), higher cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell count (WBC) (P = 0.019) and to receive rituximab treatment (P = 0.037). There were no significant differences in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores before immunotherapy, after immunotherapy and at last follow-up between the normal initial brain MRI group and abnormal group. No initial brain MRI changes were found to be associated with relapses. Brain MRI was reviewed in 72 patients at last follow-up with a median follow-up time of 25.5 months and 48.6 % (35/72) of patients had abnormal brain MRI. The mRS score of the group with normal brain MRI at last follow-up was significantly lower than that of the abnormal group. Conclusions: About 40.0 % of children with anti-NMDAR encephalitis had abnormal initial brain MRI. Initial brain MRI was associated with certain clinical profiles, but not with relapse and prognosis. Around half of patients had abnormal brain MRI at last follow-up and were prone to have higher mRS score.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?