CURRENT STATUS OF THE “GLANDULAR MUCOPROTEIN” AND “MUCOPROTEOSE” FRACTIONS OF THE GASTRIC MUCIN: A REVIEW OF 15 YEARS' PROGRESS IN THIS AREA *

G. Glass
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1749-6632.1967.TB51005.X
IF: 6.499
1967-01-01
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Gastric mucin, to comply with the terminology of Meyer,l has only a physiological meaning denoting a viscous secretion of the stomach. I t refers to all the viscous materials secreted by the mucous cells of the gastric mucosa. Gastric mucin is derived from several sources: 1 ) surface epithelial columnar cells, 2 ) mucous neck cells of the fundic glands of the body, 3 ) mucous cells of the cardiac glands, and 4) mucous cells of the pyloric glands. The first separation of gastric much into two fractions was done on the basis of physical and physiological considerations.2 The first fraction to be recognized was visible mucus, which forms a mucous lining of the surface of the gastric mucosa. The other fraction, which is dissolved in the gastric juice gives it the feature of viscosity, cannot be separated from it by simple filtration or centrifugation but only by precipitation with organic precipitants. This material, named dissolved mucin by Babkin and his associates,2 is closely related to many of the biologically active materials of the s t ~ m a c h . ~ , ~ It forms part of the nonparietal gastric secretions5 and, as such, is part of Hollander’s “alkaline component”.e In 1950, in our l a b ~ r a t o r y , ~ ~ dissolved mucin was further broken down into two fractions: 1 ) dissolved mucoprotein and 2 ) dissolved mucoproteose. These differed from one another in their chemical composition, physical characteristics, electrophoretic mobility, physiological significance, pharmacological responses, and cellular derivation. The described fractionation method was subsequently used by other investigatorslo-22 and accepted by many other a ~ t h o r s . ~ ~ ~ ~ The existence of the two different mucous fractions in gastric dissolved mucin was also supported by Komarov28 who, himselfzg using a different approach, contributed to this concept. To these two fractions, a third was later added,3O namely “soluble mucus.” It represented a liquefied fraction of the visible mucus physically dissolved in gastric juice before undergoing further degradation. From the onset, we have emphasized that mucoproteose did not represent pure material and that it “is not a chemical entity but a complex of intermediate products in the process of enzymatic digestion . . .” and that the “name ‘dissolved mucoproteose’ is a simplification and stands for a complex of proteose-like split products of the gastric mucous substances. . . .”g Concerning the other component, “dissolved gastric mucoprotein”, we initially thought it was a well defined chemical sub~ tance .~ However, when more information became available in 1953, we concluded that “. . . glandular mucoprotein can be further refined with more delicate chemical or physical techniq~es.”~O And in 1955 with still more information available, we noted:31 “. . . the glandular mucoprotein fraction, as processed from human gastric juice is not homogeneous in spite of its reasonable electrophoretic homogeneity in the Tiselius
What problem does this paper attempt to address?