Bothrops snake venom L-amino acid oxidases impair biofilm formation of clinically relevant bacteria

Thales Alves de Melo Fernandes,Tássia Rafaella Costa,Ralciane de Paula Menezes,Meliza Arantes de Souza,Carlos Henrique Gomes Martins,Nilson Nicolau Junior,Fernanda Gobbi Amorim,Loïc Quinton,Lorena Polloni,Samuel Cota Teixeira,Eloisa Amália Vieira Ferro,Andreimar Martins Soares,Veridiana de Melo Rodrigues Ávila
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2023.107569
IF: 3.035
2024-02-01
Toxicon
Abstract:The present work addressed the abilities of two L-amino acid oxidases isolated from Bothrops moojeni (BmooLAAO-I) and Bothrops jararacussu (BjussuLAAO-II) snake venoms to control the growth and prevent the biofilm formation of clinically relevant bacterial pathogens. Upon S. aureus (ATCC BAA44) and S. aureus (clinical isolates), BmooLAAO-I (MIC = 0.12 and 0.24 μg/mL, respectively) and BjussuLAAO-II (MIC = 0.15 μg/mL) showed a potent bacteriostatic effect. Against E. coli (ATCC BAA198) and E. coli (clinical isolates), BmooLAAO-I (MIC = 15.6 and 62.5 μg/mL, respectively) and BjussuLAAO-II (MIC = 4.88 and 9.76 μg/mL, respectively) presented a lower extent effect. Also, BmooLAAO-I (MICB50 = 0.195 μg/mL) and BjussuLAAO-II (MICB50 = 0.39 μg/mL) inhibited the biofilm formation of S. aureus (clinical isolates) in 88% and 89%, respectively, and in 89% and 53% of E. coli (clinical isolates). Moreover, scanning electron microscopy confirmed that the toxins affected bacterial morphology by increasing the roughness of the cell surface and inhibited the biofilm formation. Furthermore, analysis of the tridimensional structures of the toxins showed that the surface-charge distribution presents a remarkable positive region close to the glycosylation motif, which is more pronounced in BmooLAAO-I than BjussuLAAO-II. This region may assist the interaction with bacterial and biofilm surfaces. Collectively, our findings propose that venom-derived antibiofilm agents are promising biotechnological tools which could provide novel strategies for biofilm-associated infections.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?