Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta‐analysis of Single‐arm Studies
Bin Wang,Peng He,Xiowei Liu,Zhengfang Wu,Bin Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13437
2022-11-17
Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:The graphical abstract of Single‐arm meta analysis of UBE for LSS. Analysis of the complication rate of unilateral biportal endoscopic in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Analyze the causes of complications. Advice on reducing complications. Purpose This article aims to summarize the incidence of these complications through a meta‐analysis, analyze the causes of complications and provide clinical promotion and recommendations. Methods Databases and retrieval platform including PubMed, Web of science, Springer link, Cochrane clinical trials, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Europe PMC, Wiley online, OVID, Clinical trials, CNKI and WanFang, and supplement the literature through Google Scholar, collect all the unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) controlled trials and non‐controlled trials of UBE in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The search time limit is from January 1, 2000 to December 25, 2021. After two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies, meta‐analysis was performed using Stata 15.1 software. Results Finally, 24 studies were included, including 999 patients. The results of a single‐arm rate meta‐analysis showed that the overall complication rate of UBE treatment of LSS was 6.27% [95% CI (0.0412, 0.0876)], and the incidence of dural tear was 2.49% [95% CI (0.0133, 0.0390)], the incidence of transient paresthesia was 0.14% [95% CI (0.0000, 0.0072)], the incidence of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma was 0.27% [95% CI (0.0000, 0.0096)], the incidence of postop headache, inadequate decompression, root injury and infection was 0.00%. Conclusion Current evidence shows that the complication rate of UBE in the treatment of LSS is low, mainly due to dural tears. Limited by the number and quality of included studies, the above conclusions still need to be confirmed by more studies.
orthopedics