Monitoring of Curve Progression in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using 3-D Ultrasound

Kelly Ka-Lee Lai,Timothy Tin-Yan Lee,Heidi Hin-Ting Lau,Winnie Chiu-Wing Chu,Jack Chun-Yiu Cheng,René Marten Castelein,Tom P C Schlösser,Tsz-Ping Lam,Yong-Ping Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.11.011
Abstract:Objective: The aim of the work described here was to determine whether 3-D ultrasound can provide results comparable to those of conventional X-ray examination in assessing curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: One hundred thirty-six participants with AIS (42 males and 94 females; age range: 10-18 y, mean age: 14.1 ± 1.9 y) with scoliosis of different severity (Cobb angle range: 10º- 85º, mean: of 24.3 ± 14.4º) were included. Each participant underwent biplanar low-dose X-ray EOS and 3-D ultrasound system scanning with the same posture on the same date. Participants underwent the second assessment at routine clinical follow-up. Manual measurements of scoliotic curvature on ultrasound coronal projection images and posterior-anterior radiographs were expressed as the ultrasound curve angle (UCA) and radiographic Cobb angle (RCA), respectively. RCA and UCA increments ≥5º represented a scoliosis progression detected by X-ray assessment and 3-D ultrasound assessment, respectively. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of UCA measurement in detecting scoliosis progression were 0.93 and 0.90, respectively. The negative likelihood ratio of the diagnostic test for scoliosis progression by the 3-D ultrasound imaging system was 0.08. Conclusion: The 3-D ultrasound imaging method is a valid technique for detecting coronal curve progression as compared with conventional radiography in follow-up of AIS. Substituting conventional radiography with 3-D ultrasound is effective in reducing the radiation dose to which AIS patients are exposed during their follow-up examinations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?