Thiotungstate-copper interactions II. The effects of tetrathiotungstate on systemic copper metabolism in normal and copper-treated rats.

A. Mcquaid,M. Lamand,J. Mason

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-0134(94)80005-7

IF: 4.336

1994-02-15

Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Spinal versus general anesthesia for patients undergoing outpatient total knee arthroplasty: a national propensity matched analysis of early postoperative outcomes

Mark C Kendall,Alexander D Cohen,Stephanie Principe-Marrero,Peter Sidhom,Patricia Apruzzese,Gildasio De Oliveira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01442-2

2021-09-15

Abstract:Background: A comparison of different anesthetic techniques to evaluate short term outcomes has yet to be performed for patients undergoing outpatient knee replacements. The aim of this investigation was to compare short term outcomes of spinal (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA) in patients undergoing outpatient total knee replacements. Methods: The ACS NSQIP datasets were queried to extract patients who underwent primary, elective, unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 2005 and 2018 performed as an outpatient procedure. The primary outcome was a composite score of serious adverse events (SAE). The primary independent variable was the type of anesthesia (e.g., general vs. spinal). Results: A total of 353,970 patients who underwent TKA procedures were identified comprising of 6,339 primary, elective outpatient TKA procedures. Of these, 2,034 patients received GA and 3,540 received SA. A cohort of 1,962 patients who underwent outpatient TKA under GA were propensity matched for covariates with patients who underwent outpatient TKA under SA. SAE rates at 72 h after surgery were not greater in patients receiving GA compared to SA (0.92%, 0.66%, P = 0.369). In contrast, minor adverse events were greater in the GA group compared to SA (2.09%, 0.51%), P < 0.001. The rate of postoperative transfusion was greater in the patients receiving GA. Conclusions: The type of anesthetic technique, general or spinal anesthesia does not alter short term SAEs, readmissions and failure to rescue in patients undergoing outpatient TKR surgery. Recognizing the benefits of SA tailored to the anesthetic management may maximize the clinical benefits in this patient population.
Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are There Differences in Complication and Readmission Rates?

Nathanael D. Heckmann,Ayushmita De,Kimberly R. Porter,Jeffrey B. Stambough

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.036

2022-11-06

Abstract:Background Spinal anesthesia (SP) utilization continues to expand in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, little is known regarding differences in complication rates between spinal and general anesthesia used for primary TKA. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the length of stay (LOS), operative time, and readmission and revision rates between patients who received spinal and general anesthesia during TKA. Methods The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was used to identify primary elective TKA patients from 2017 to 2020. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, general (GN) and SP, based on the mode of anesthesia administered during the index surgery. In total, 270,251 TKAs were identified, of which 126,970 (47.0%) received general anesthesia and 143,281 (53.0%) received spinal anesthesia. Length of stay, operative time, 90-day readmission, and 90-day revisions were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for potential confounders. Results After accounting for confounding factors, SP was associated with a lower risk of having a LOS greater than 3 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.470, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.454-0.487, P < .0001), but a slightly higher likelihood of having a longer operative time (OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.056-1.094, P < .0001). SP was also linked to lower rates of 90-day readmission (OR 0.845, 95% CI 0.790-0.904, P < .0001) and lower risk of 90-day all-cause revision (OR 0.506, 95% CI 0.462-0.555, P < .0001). Conclusion SP was associated with a lower 90-day readmission rate and a lower risk of 90-day revision. These findings support the best practice guidelines of The Joint Commission to use spinal anesthesia when possible as part of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.

orthopedics
Parallel algorithms for fractional and maximal independent sets in planar graphs

Norm Dadoun,D. Kirkpatrick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-218X(90)90130-5

IF: 1.254

1990-04-01

Discrete Applied Mathematics

Abstract:
Expression of rat interleukin-5 and generation of neutralizing antiserum: a comparative study of rat IL-5 produced in Escherichia coli and insect cells.

C. Pierrot,C. Cocude,C. Cêtre,C. Godin,S. Lafitte,M. Capron,J. Khalife

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/BBRC.1998.9843

1998-12-30

Abstract:A cDNA coding for rat IL-5 was obtained by RT-PCR from total spleen RNA. With the exception of a single a.a. replacement at position 85 (L-P), it is identical to the published sequence obtained by retroviral gene transfer. This cDNA was used to express biologically active recombinant IL-5 in E. coli and in insect cells using a baculovirus system. Rat IL-5 is more active on B13, an IL-5 dependent cell line, when produced in insect cells (specific activity 1.47 x 10(11)UI/mg compared to 4.28 x 10(6)UI/mg). This increased activity seems to be associated with the presence of IL-5 homodimers in recombinant protein preparations. A rabbit antiserum raised against recombinant bacterial IL-5 specifically inhibited B13 proliferation induced by bacterial and baculoviral IL-5. The availability of such reagents should facilitate studying the role of IL-5 in different infectious diseases, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and in transplantation biology where the rat represents a more suitable model than mice.
Neuraxial and general anesthesia for outpatient total joint arthroplasty result in similarly low rates of major perioperative complications: a multicentered cohort study

Edward Yap,Julia Wei,Christopher Webb,Kevin Ng,Matthias Behrends

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-103189

2022-01-06

Abstract:Background Neuraxial anesthesia when compared with general anesthesia has shown to improve outcomes following lower extremity total joint arthroplasty. It is unclear whether these benefits are present in outpatient surgery given the selection of healthier patients. Objective To compare the effects of neuraxial versus general anesthesia on outcomes following ambulatory hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods Multicentered retrospective cohort study in ambulatory hip or knee arthroplasty patients between January 2017 and December 2019. Primary endpoint examined 30-day major postoperative complications (mortality, myocardial infarction, deep venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, stroke, and acute renal failure). Results Of 11 523 eligible patients identified, 10 003 received neuraxial anesthesia, while 1520 received general anesthesia. 30-day major complications did not differ between neuraxial anesthesia and general anesthesia groups (1.8% vs 2.3%; aOR=0.85, CI: 0.56 to 1.27, p=0.39). There was no difference in 30-day minor complications (surgical site infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection; 3.3% vs 4.1%; aOR=0.83, CI: 0.62 to 1.14, p=0.23). The neuraxial group demonstrated reduced pain and analgesia requirements and had less postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Median recovery room length of stay was shorter by 52 min in the general anesthesia group, but these patients were more likely to fail same day discharge (33% vs 23.4%; p<0.01). Conclusion Anesthesia type was not associated with an increased risk for complications. However, neuraxial anesthesia improved outcomes that predict readiness for discharge: patients had less pain, required less opioids, and had a lower incidence of PONV, thus improving the rate of same day discharge. Trial registration number NCT04203732 .

anesthesiology
Enhancing Rationale Management with Second Life Meetings

A. D. Lucia,Fausto Fasano,R. Francese,I. Passero

Abstract:
Pharmacokinetic profile of a new 3-azinomethyl rifamycin (SPA-S-565) in volunteers as compared with conventional rifampicin.

M. Kelkar,A. Saraf,D. Bakhle,V. Nazaré,S. Ajay,S. Hegde,H. Lal,N. Cooverji,T. Bruzzese

Abstract:The pharmacokinetics and tolerance of a single oral dose (150 mg) of a new 3-azinomethyl rifamycin (SPA-S-565, USAN rifametane) was compared with 150 mg of conventional rifampicin in six healthy volunteers. The mean maximum concentration (Cmax) of SPA-S-565 was 3.94 +/- 0.26 micrograms/ml, and resulted significantly higher as compared with the Cmax after rifampicin, which was 2.89 +/- 0.20 micrograms/ml. The mean maximum time (tmax) for SPA-S-565 was 2.1 +/- 0.3 h as compared with that of rifampicin, which was 1.6 +/- 0.3 h, the difference between these values not being statistically significant. The elimination half-life (t1/2) of SPA-S-565 was 17.5 +/- 2.6 h in contrast to the half-life of 2.8 +/- 0.26 h seen with rifampicin; the difference was found to be highly significant. The mean area under the serum concentration curve from 0 to the last detectable concentration (AUC0-t) and the mean area under the serum concentration-versus-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of SPA-S-565 were almost six times than those obtained with conventional rifampicin. The differences between the two compounds were highly significant. In all cases except one volunteer all the biochemical parameters remained within normal range following single oral dose administration of SPA-S-565. In one volunteer, although there was a slight rise in serum alkaline phosphatase above the normal range, the original value itself was at the very upper limit of the normal range (i.e., 80 IU/L). Although there was a significant increase in the levels of serum alkaline phosphatase, serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGTP) and serum amylase levels, 24 h following the administration of SPA-S-565 these levels remained within the normal range.
Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Contemporary Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties

Aaron R Owen,Adam W Amundson,Dirk R Larson,Christopher M Duncan,Hugh M Smith,Rebecca L Johnson,Michael J Taunton,Mark W Pagnano,Daniel J Berry,Matthew P Abdel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.053

Abstract:Background: Interest in spinal anesthesia utilization in revision total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) is rising. This study investigated the pain control, length of stay (LOS), and complications associated with spinal versus general anesthesia in a single institution series of revision TKAs. Methods: We identified 3,711 revision TKAs (3,495 patients) from 2001 to 2016 using our institutional total joint registry. There were 66% who had general anesthesia and 34% who had spinal anesthesia. Mean age, sex, and BMI were similar between groups at 67 years, 53% women, and 32, respectively. Data were analyzed using inverse probability of treatment weighted models based on propensity scores that accounted for patient and operative factors. Mean follow-up was 6 years (range, 2 to 17). Results: Patients treated with spinal anesthesia required fewer postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) (P < .0001) and had lower numeric pain rating scale scores (P < .001). Spinal anesthesia was associated with shorter LOS (4.0 versus 4.6 days; P < .0001), less cases of altered mental status (AMS; Odds Ratio (OR) 2.0, P = .004), less intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (OR 1.6, P = .02), fewer re-revisions (OR 1.7, P < .001), and less reoperations (OR 1.4, P < .001). There was no difference in the incidence of VTE (P = .82), 30-day readmissions (P = .06), or 90-day readmissions (P = .18) between anesthetic techniques. Conclusion: We found that spinal anesthesia for revision TKAs was associated with significantly lower pain scores, reduced OME requirements, and decreased LOS. Furthermore, spinal anesthesia was associated with fewer cases of AMS, ICU admissions, and re-revisions even after accounting for numerous patient and operative factors. Level of evidence: Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.
Spinal versus general anesthesia for hip arthroscopy—a pandemic (COVID) and epidemic (opioid) driven study

Thomas J. W.,Kay S Jones,Nicole Dwyer,Amy M McManus,Ellen B Byrd,Wallace L Freeman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnae009

2024-03-27

Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery

Abstract:ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to compare general anesthesia (GA) to spinal anesthesia (SA) for hip arthroscopy, based on measurable perioperative parameters. The pandemic signaled a change from GA to SA, and thus a retrospective review was performed of the first 120 consecutive SA cases compared to the last 120 GA cases prior to the pandemic. Demographic data included age, sex, BMI, preop narcotic usage and procedure performed. The groups were compared for post-anesthesia care unit length of stay, entry and discharge visual analog scale (VAS) scores, morphine mg equivalent usage, need for regional blocks and untoward events. Additionally, the length of time from entry to the operating room until completion of induction anesthesia was compared. Demographically, the groups were virtually identical. SA used significantly less morphine mg equivalent (6.0 versus 8.1; P = 0.005), had more needing no narcotics (17 versus 7; P = 0.031), fewer requiring blocks (1 versus 14; P = 0.001) and lower entry VAS scores (5.2 versus 6.2; P = 0.003). Five early SA patients required catheterization for urinary retention, and this was avoided later in the study by having patient void on call to operating room and avoiding anticholinergic agents. Completion of induction anesthesia was 0.8 min longer for SA. Hip arthroscopy can be effectively performed with either GA or SA. SA results in statistically significant better post-anesthesia care unit pain control, reflected by lower entry VAS, less need for narcotics and fewer requiring regional blocks compared to GA. Urinary retention, a potential problem of SA, is minimized with routine precautions.

orthopedics
Improved outcomes for spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a retrospective cohort study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Eliana R Weinstein,Richard B Boyer,Robert S White,Roniel Y Weinberg,Jacob M Lurie,Nicolas Salvatierra,Tiffany R Tedore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2022-104217

2023-05-02

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

Abstract:Background There is a lack of consensus in the literature as to whether anesthetic modality influences perioperative complications in hip fracture surgery. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of spinal anesthesia compared with general anesthesia on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent hip fracture surgery using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). Methods We used the ACS NSQIP to identify patients aged 50 and older who received either spinal or general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery from 2016 to 2019. Propensity-score matching was performed to control for clinically relevant covariates. The primary outcome of interest was the combined incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or death within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay and operative time. Results Among the 40 527 patients aged 50 and over who received either spinal or general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery from 2016 to 2019, 7358 spinal anesthesia cases were matched to general anesthesia cases. General anesthesia was associated with a higher incidence of combined 30-day stroke, MI or death compared with spinal anesthesia (OR 1.219 (95% CI 1.076 to 1.381); p=0.002). General anesthesia was also associated with a higher frequency of 30-day mortality (OR 1.276 (95% CI 1.099 to 1.481); p=0.001) and longer operative time (64.73 vs 60.28 min; p<0.001). Spinal anesthesia had a longer average hospital length of stay (6.29 vs 5.73 days; p=0.001). Conclusion Our propensity-matched analysis suggests that spinal anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia is associated with lower postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

anesthesiology
Capillary electrophoresis: New technology for DNA diagnostics

H. Le,D. Fung,Bing Yu,R. Trent

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313029800169496

Abstract:Summary New innovations in the diagnostic laboratory achieve their full potential when they can be automated. Increasingly molecular biology (DNA) techniques are being utilised in traditional pathology disciplines, as well as the more recent ones of cytogenetics and molecular genetics. Molecular biology was first exploited for diagnostic purposes when Southern blotting became established. However the time‐consuming nature of the methodology, as well as the skills required, made it difficult for Southern blotting to be used routinely in the service laboratory. Subsequently the invention of PCR facilitated the approach to DNA diagnostics. Today PCR in commercial or home‐made kits is used for a range of procedures. The steps required to amplify DNA with PCR can also be fully automated. However the analysis of PCR products, which frequently requires slab gel electrophoresis and toxic chemicals or radioisotopes for visualisation, remains difficult to automate. An alternative way for analysing PCR products is now available through capillary electrophoresis. With this technique, automation can be extended to sample loading, electrophoresis and data analysis. The use of toxic chemicals or radioisotopes can be avoided.Abbreviations: ASO, allele specific oligonucleotides; IVS, intervening sequence; MS‐PCR, mutagenically separated‐polymerase chain reaction; SSCP, single strand conformation polymorphism.
Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty in the "Unhealthy": Staying Safe Using Institutional Protocols

Alexander V. Strait,Henry Ho,Kevin B. Fricka,William G. Hamilton,Robert A. Sershon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.025

IF: 4.435

2024-07-25

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Abstract:Background Recent expansion in the indications for outpatient total joint arthroplasty has led to debate over patient selection. The purpose of this study was to compare early clinical outcomes and complications of same-day discharge (SDD) hip and knee arthroplasties from a high-volume institution based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification. Methods Prospectively collected data were reviewed for all SDD primary joint arthroplasties between January 2013 and August 2023. There were eight surgeons who performed 7,258 cases at hospital outpatient (n = 4,288) or ambulatory surgery centers (n = 2,970). This included 3,239 total hip arthroplasties (THAs), 1,503 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), and 2,516 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). The ASA 1 group comprised 506 subjects, compared to 5,005 for ASA 2, and 1,736 for ASA 3. Primary outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, complications, and revisions within 24-hours and 90-days of surgery. The ASA 3 group was older (ASA1 = 55 versus ASA2 = 63 versus ASA3 = 66 years; P < 0.01) and had a higher body mass index (BMI) (ASA1 = 25.4 versus ASA2 = 28.5 versus ASA3 = 32.7; P < 0.01). Results There were no differences between ASA groups in joint-related ED visits, readmissions, and complications within 24-hours and 90-days of surgery ( P > 0.05). Subjects in the ASA 3 group experienced greater 90-day revisions compared to the other groups (ASA1 = 1 of 506, 0.2% versus ASA2 = 15 of 5,005, 0.3% versus ASA3 = 15 of 1,736, 0.9%; P = 0.01). Regarding systemic events, ASA 1 subjects experienced significantly greater 24-hour complications (8 of 506, 1.6%) and ED visits (5 of 506, 1.0%), and ASA 3 subjects had a higher incidence of 90-day readmissions (19 of 1,736, 1.1%) compared to the other groups ( P < 0.05). Within 24 hours of discharge, urinary retention and syncope were the most frequent complications that required additional healthcare utilization. Conclusions Medically optimized patients categorized as ASA 3 can safely undergo SDD hip and knee arthroplasty without increased risk of 24-hour or 90-day complications. Patient preference for outpatient care, reliable social support, and independent functional status are imperative for a successful outpatient program.

orthopedics
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, induced anxiety, and quality of life.

Christopher L. Sola,J. Michael Bostwick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4065/80.2.232

IF: 11.104

2005-02-01

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Abstract:Since its approval in 1985, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has supplanted antiarrhythmic drugs as the standard of care for patients with potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. The increased popularity of ICDs stems primarily from their safety and tolerability compared with commonly used medications notorious for adverse drug reactions. As ICD indications have broadened, the number of implantations has increased substantially, and more attention has been directed to sequelae of implantation, particularly after ICD firing. Although scant, studies of quality of life and psychiatric symptoms in patients with ICDs consistently report assorted psychiatric disturbances affecting up to 87% of recipients. Depression and anxiety predominate: up to 38% of patients experience symptoms that meet diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder. Psychological theories such as the classic conditioning model, learned helplessness model, and cognitive appraisal model have been invoked to conceptualize these new-onset ICD-induced anxiety disorders. Small trials of psychosocial interventions, including support groups and cognitive behavioral therapy, have had mixed results. Little is known about preexisting anxiety disorders in ICD recipients, particularly which premorbid features predict a worse prognosis, other than suggestions that younger patients and those receiving multiple shocks are at greater risk. Prospective studies of the psychopathology of patients with ICDs, both before and after implantation, are warranted.
Spinal anesthesia in a designated block bay for total joint arthroplasty: improving operating room efficiency

Ryland Kagan,Stephanie Zhao,Andrew Stone,Alicia J Johnson,Thomas Huff,Kathryn Schabel,Glenn E Woodworth,Ryan MJ Ivie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2020-101773

2020-10-01

Abstract:Background Creating highly efficient operating room (OR) protocols for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a challenging and multifactorial process. We evaluated whether spinal anesthesia in a designated block bay (BBSA) would reduce time to incision, improve first case start time and decrease conversion to general anesthesia (GA). Methods Retrospective cohort study on the first 86 TJA cases with BBSA from April to December 2018, compared with 344 TJA cases with spinal anesthesia performed in the OR (ORSA) during the same period. All TJA cases were included if the anesthetic plan was for spinal anesthesia. Patients were excluded if circumstances delayed start time or time to incision (advanced vascular access, pacemaker interrogation, surgeon availability). Data were extracted and analyzed via a linear mixed effects model to compare time to incision, via a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare first case start time, and via a Fisher’s exact test to compare conversion to GA between the groups. Results In the mixed effect model, the BBSA group time to incision was 5.37 min less than the ORSA group (p=0.018). The BBSA group had improved median first case start time (30.0 min) versus the ORSA group (40.5 min, p<0.0001). There was lower conversion to GA 2/86 (2.33%) in the BBSA group versus 36/344 (10.47%) in the ORSA group (p=0.018). No serious adverse events were noted in either group. Conclusions BBSA had limited impact on time to incision for TJA, with a small decrease for single OR days and no improvement on OR days with two rooms. BBSA was associated with improved first case start time and decreased rate of conversion to GA. Further research is needed to identify how BBSA affects the efficiency of TJA.

anesthesiology
Postoperative outcomes with neuraxial versus general anesthesia in bilateral total hip arthroplasty

Brittany N Burton,Jennifer A Padwal,Matthew W Swisher,Courtni R Salinas,Rodney A Gabriel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.016

Abstract:Study objective: Current evidence remains limited on the postoperative outcomes of neuraxial (NA) versus general anesthesia (GA) as primary anesthesia type in patients receiving simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (BTHA). We aimed to evaluate the rates of postoperative outcomes among patients receiving NA versus GA for BTHA. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Multi-institutional. Patients: A total of 798 patients undergoing BTHA with 519 and 279 who received GA and NA, respectively. We used the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for years 2007 to 2016. Interventions: Patients undergoing BTHA. Measurements: We propensity-score matched on demographic factors and comorbid conditions to compare rates of postoperative outcomes among cohorts (NA versus GA). We performed Pearson chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum test to compare NA versus GA cohorts. Main results: The final analysis included 798 BTHA patients, of which 35% received NA as the primary anesthetic. The median age was 58 years old and 50.8% were female. The rate of perioperative transfusion in the NA and GA group were 20.1% and 29.0%, respectively (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in the rate of postoperative outcomes between patients receiving NA versus GA as their primary anesthesia type (Bonferroni corrected p < 0.006 was considered statistically significant). Conclusion: Our study showed no significant differences in postoperative outcomes between NA versus GA following BTHA. Further studies are needed to investigate outcomes among this surgical population.
Comparison Of Combined Lumbosacral Plexus And T12 Paravertebral Nerve Blocks With General Anesthesia In Older Adults Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Li Min,Chen Chen,Yuan Yan,Shen Jiang,Yang Linyi,Bu Xiaoxuan,Zhang Liwei,Cao Dongmei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459320976531

2020-01-01

Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation

Abstract:Background: Total Hip Arthroplasty(THA) is a surgical treatment for hip disease. A large amount of evidence has been reported on comparing outcomes of neuraxial(spinal or epidural) anesthesia and general anesthesia. However, it is unclear whether nerve blocks(NB) as main anesthesia technique compared with general anesthesia(GA) for THA could reduce perioperative complications. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of NB and GA, using a propensity score-matched analysis(PSMA). Methods: A total of 902 patients older than 60 years old with hip disease undergoing primary THA received combined lumbosacral plexus and T-12 paravertebral nerve blocks (n = 143) or GA (n = 759) at our institution from 2012 to 2018.Binary logistic regression was used for comparison of the primary outcomes(the incidence of delirium) and the secondary outcomes(the percentage of postoperative hemoglobin(>10g/dl), transfusion(>2 units), major cardiac events(MACE), postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) and 30-day mortality) in the matched cohorts.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v 23.0. Results: Both cohorts were balanced in all included parameters after PSMA. The incidence of delirium was lower (OR 0.233,95% CI 0.064-0.845, p = 0.030) in NB group in matched cohorts. In the unmatched and matched cohorts, the percentage of Hb(>10g/dl) was higher in GA group but the incidence of transfusion(>2 units) was higher in NB group. No difference was found in the incidence of 30-day mortality in the unmatched and matched cohorts. In the unmatched cohorts, the incidence of PPC was higher and LOS was longer in NB cohort, but no difference was observed in the matched cohorts. Conclusion: In patients older than 60 years old receiving primary THA, NB could be associated with a lower incidence of delirium.
Regional versus general anesthesia for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

Tak Kyu Oh,In-Ae Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105440

2024-04-30

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

Abstract:Introduction We aimed to determine whether regional anesthesia (RA) has any advantages over general anesthesia (GA) in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in terms of mortality and postoperative complications. Methods This population-based retrospective cohort study included data of adults who underwent total knee or hip arthroplasty under RA or GA between 2016 and 2021 from the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea. RA included spinal or epidural anesthesia or a combination of both. Endpoints were 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and postoperative complications. Propensity score (PS) matching was used for statistical analysis. Results We included 517 960 patients (RA, n=380 698; GA, n=137 262) who underwent TJA. After PS matching, 186 590 patients (93 295 in each group) were included in the final analysis. In the logistic regression analyses using the PS-matched cohort, the RA group compared with the GA group showed 31% (OR: 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.80; p<0.001) and 22% (OR: 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.85; p<0.001) lower 30-day and 90-day mortality rates, respectively. However, the total postoperative complication rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (p=0.105). Conclusion RA compared with GA was associated with improved 30-day and 90-day survival outcomes in patients who underwent TJA. However, the postoperative complication rate did not differ significantly. Therefore, our results should be interpreted with caution, and more well-designed future studies are needed to clarify the most appropriate type of anesthesia for TJA.

anesthesiology
Effects of regional versus general anesthesia on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study

Mohammad A Helwani,Michael S Avidan,Arbi Ben Abdallah,Dagmar J Kaiser,John C Clohisy,Bruce L Hall,Heiko A Kaiser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00612

2015-02-04

Abstract:Background: Many orthopaedic surgical procedures can be performed with either regional or general anesthesia. We hypothesized that total hip arthroplasty with regional anesthesia is associated with less postoperative morbidity and mortality than total hip arthroplasty with general anesthesia. Methods: This retrospective propensity-matched cohort study utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database included patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty from 2007 through 2011. After matching, logistic regression was used to determine the association between the type of anesthesia and deep surgical site infections, hospital length of stay, thirty-day mortality, and cardiovascular and pulmonary complications. Results: Of 12,929 surgical procedures, 5103 (39.5%) were performed with regional anesthesia. The adjusted odds for deep surgical site infections were significantly lower in the regional anesthesia group than in the general anesthesia group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.20 to 0.72; p < 0.01). The hospital length of stay (geometric mean) was decreased by 5% (95% CI = 3% to 7%; p < 0.001) with regional anesthesia, which translates to 0.17 day for each total hip arthroplasty. Regional anesthesia was also associated with a 27% decrease in the odds of prolonged hospitalization (OR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.89; p < 0.001). The mortality rate was not significantly lower with regional anesthesia (OR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.43 to 1.42; p > 0.05). The adjusted odds for cardiovascular complications (OR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.85) and respiratory complications (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.81) were all lower in the regional anesthesia group. Conclusions: Compared with general anesthesia, regional anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty was associated with a reduction in deep surgical site infection rates, hospital length of stay, and rates of postoperative cardiovascular and pulmonary complications. These findings could have an important medical and economic impact on health-care practice.
Ambulatory total hip and knee arthroplasty: a literature review and perioperative considerations

Vivian H Y Ip,Vishal Uppal,Kwesi Kwofie,Ushma Shah,Patrick B Y Wong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02699-0

Abstract:Purpose: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA), particularly for the hip and knee, is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. The advancement/evolution of surgical and anesthesia techniques have allowed TJA to be performed on an ambulatory/same-day discharge basis. In this Continuing Professional Development module, we synthesize the perioperative evidence that may aid the development of successful ambulatory TJA pathways. Source: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for ambulatory or fast-track TJA articles. In the absence of direct evidence for the ambulatory setting, we extrapolated the evidence from the in-patient TJA literature. Principal findings: Patient selection encompassing patient, medical, and social factors is fundamental for successful same-day discharge of patients following TJA. Evidence for the type of intraoperative anesthesia favours neuraxial technique for achieving same day discharge criteria and reduced perioperative complications. Availability of short-acting local anesthetic for neuraxial anesthesia would affect the anesthetic choice. Nonetheless, modern general anesthesia with multimodal analgesia and antithrombotics in a well selected population can be considered. Regional analgesia forms an integral part of the multimodal analgesia regime to reduce opioid consumption and facilitate same-day hospital discharge, reducing hospital readmission. For ambulatory total knee arthroplasty, a combination of adductor canal block with local anesthetic periarticular infiltration provided is a suitable regional analgesic regimen. Conclusion: Anesthesia for TJA has evolved as such that same-day discharge will become the norm for selected patients. It is essential to establish pathways for early discharge to prevent adverse effects and readmission in this population. As more data are generated from an increased volume of ambulatory TJA, more robust evidence will emerge for the ideal anesthetic components to optimize outcomes.
Racial Disparity in the Perioperative Care for Patients Undergoing Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

Ahmad Elsharydah,Ahmed S Embabi,Abu Minhajuddin,Girish P Joshi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-017-0409-2

Abstract:Background: Total joint arthroplasty is an effective treatment for osteoarthritis-related symptoms not resolved with non-surgical therapy. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the use of neuraxial anesthesia for these surgical procedures. We utilized the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to study the effects of race on the type of anesthesia and postoperative outcomes in elective total joint replacement surgery. Methods: We included African-American and White adult patients (age > 18 years) undergoing elective primary total knee or hip arthroplasty under general or neuraxial (spinal or epidural) anesthesia (2005-2013). A 1:3 matched sample of African-American vs. White patients was created based on propensity scores. The differences in anesthetic technique and postoperative complications between the two groups were evaluated before and after matching. Results: A total of 102,122 patients were included. African-American patients were younger (mean ± standard deviation, 62.08 ± 11.17 vs. 66.37 ± 10.53 years, p < 0.001) and had a lower modified Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score (3.07 ± 1.39 vs. 3.42 ± 1.33, p < 0.001). General anesthesia was used more commonly in the African-American patients group (64.56 vs. 62.25%, p < 0.001). However, when the two groups were matched, the differences in the type of anesthesia disappeared (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence limits [CL] 0.85-1.08, p = 0.455). African-American patients had a higher rate of 30-day postoperative complications before matching (3.08 vs. 2.20%, p < 0.001) and after matching (3.63 vs. 2.33%) (OR 1.58, 95% CL 1.13-2.21, p = 0.007). Conclusions: There is no significant difference in the type of anesthesia received for total joint arthroplasty between African-American and White patients; however, there is a disparity in the postoperative outcomes in favor of the White patient group. Further studies needed to explain the reasons for these findings.

Thiotungstate-copper interactions II. The effects of tetrathiotungstate on systemic copper metabolism in normal and copper-treated rats.

Spinal versus general anesthesia for patients undergoing outpatient total knee arthroplasty: a national propensity matched analysis of early postoperative outcomes

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are There Differences in Complication and Readmission Rates?

Parallel algorithms for fractional and maximal independent sets in planar graphs

Expression of rat interleukin-5 and generation of neutralizing antiserum: a comparative study of rat IL-5 produced in Escherichia coli and insect cells.

Neuraxial and general anesthesia for outpatient total joint arthroplasty result in similarly low rates of major perioperative complications: a multicentered cohort study

Enhancing Rationale Management with Second Life Meetings

Pharmacokinetic profile of a new 3-azinomethyl rifamycin (SPA-S-565) in volunteers as compared with conventional rifampicin.

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Contemporary Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties

Spinal versus general anesthesia for hip arthroscopy—a pandemic (COVID) and epidemic (opioid) driven study

Improved outcomes for spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a retrospective cohort study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Capillary electrophoresis: New technology for DNA diagnostics

Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty in the "Unhealthy": Staying Safe Using Institutional Protocols

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, induced anxiety, and quality of life.

Spinal anesthesia in a designated block bay for total joint arthroplasty: improving operating room efficiency

Postoperative outcomes with neuraxial versus general anesthesia in bilateral total hip arthroplasty

Comparison Of Combined Lumbosacral Plexus And T12 Paravertebral Nerve Blocks With General Anesthesia In Older Adults Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Regional versus general anesthesia for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

Effects of regional versus general anesthesia on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study

Ambulatory total hip and knee arthroplasty: a literature review and perioperative considerations

Racial Disparity in the Perioperative Care for Patients Undergoing Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Cohort Study