Abstract:Abstract At 27% of U.S. methane (CH4) emissions (3% of U.S. total emissions), enteric CH4 emissions represent the largest source of U.S. CH4 emissions, surpassing natural gas systems according to the latest report from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Total manure CH4 emissions represent 1% of total U.S. emissions. Enteric and manure CH4 emissions from the beef industry represent 2.1% and 0.03%, respectively, of U.S. total emissions. These contributions of CH4 emissions to total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions are determined by relating CH4 emissions to a carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent basis (CO2-e) by multiplying the amount of CH4 emissions by its global warming potential (EPA uses 25 for CH4 on a 100-y basis; GWP100). The GWP100 method was adopted following the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, and ever since this time its appropriateness for short-lived climate forcers (SLCF; e.g., CH4 has a 12-y atmospheric lifespan) has been debated. This debate exists because GWP100 is a misnomer, as it is known to have no relationship with the contribution of a gas to warming. Since CH4 is a SLCF, when emission rates are decreasing there is a decreasing concentration of CH4 in the atmosphere. To account for SLCF, an alternative accounting methodology, termed GWP-star (GWP*), has been proposed to convert SLCF to a CO2-warming equivalence (CO2-we). The CO2-we values from GWP* methodology has been demonstrated to closely relate to warming contributions compared with the CO2-e value from the GWP100 method. Applying the GWP* metric to enteric and manure CH4 emissions from the beef industry reduces the implied contribution to climate warming of these emission sources by 92% and 62%, on average from 2010-2020, respectively, compared with the GWP100 methodology. There are currently promising mitigation technologies emerging for mitigating enteric CH4 emission. For example 3-nitrooxypropanol may reduce enteric CH4 by 30% and Asparagopsis seaweed may reduce it by 80%. We explored the effects of these technologies on CO2-we if they had 100% adoption by the beef industry and if these mitigation potentials were consistent across all production systems (admittedly a big assumption). Both technologies would result in negative CO2-we for 20-y, after which a new baseline would be achieved and the CH4 emissions would begin contributing to warming again (i.e., accumulating CH4 in the atmosphere). During the 20-y of net-cooling, a 30% and 80% reduction in enteric CH4 would result in -143 (3% of U.S. total CO2 emissions) and -461 (10% of U.S. total CO2 emissions) million metric tons of CO2-we/y, respectively. Ultimately, adopting GWP* not only provides estimates that actually relate to contributions to climate warming, therefore providing a more appropriate metric than what is currently used, but also provides a means for the beef industry to leverage mitigation strategies to be a solution for climate change.

[Dual-Perspective Analysis of the Warming Effect of the Methane Emissions from Animal Husbandry in China]

Inventory of Methane Emissions from Livestock in China from 1980 to 2013

Animal board invited review: Opportunities and challenges in using GWP* to report the impact of ruminant livestock on global temperature change

Balancing Food System Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction and Food Security in China

Methane emissions from California dairies estimated using novel climate metric Global Warming Potential Star show improved agreement with modeled warming dynamics

Retrospective and projected warming-equivalent emissions from global livestock and cattle calculated with an alternative climate metric denoted GWP

Mitigation Potential of Methane Emissions in China’s Livestock Sector Can Reach One-Third by 2030 at Low Cost

A 130‐year Global Inventory of Methane Emissions from Livestock: Trends, Patterns, and Drivers

Mitigation potential of methane emissions in China's livestock sector can reach one-third by 2030 at low cost

Livestock greenhouse gas emission and mitigation potential in China

China’s Low-Emission Pathways Toward Climate-Neutral Livestock Production for Animal-Derived Foods

Northward shift of historical methane emission hotspots from the livestock sector in China and assessment of potential mitigation options

Comprehensive assessment of refined greenhouse gas emissions from China's livestock sector

20 Methane Accounting and Its Importance to the Beef industry’s Implied Contribution to Climate Warming

Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Characteristics and Emissions Reduction Measures of Animal Husbandry in Inner Mongolia

Assessing Carbon Emissions from Animal Husbandry in China: Trends, Regional Variations and Mitigation Strategies

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Livestock Waste: China Evaluation

Inventory of Anthropogenic Methane Emissions in Mainland China from 1980 to 2010

Estimation of methane and nitrous oxide emission from livestock and poultry in China during 1949–2003

EVALUATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM THREE CONTRASTING INTEGRATED CROP AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS DURING 1991-2016 IN GANSU OF CHINA

Evaluation of anthropogenic CH 4 emissions over China using bottom-up inventories