Abstract:Abstract Background Quality improvement collaboratives are widely used to improve health care in both high-income and low and middle-income settings. Teams from multiple health facilities share learning on a given topic and apply a structured cycle of change testing. Previous systematic reviews reported positive effects on target outcomes, but the role of context and mechanism of change is underexplored. This realist-inspired systematic review aims to analyse contextual factors influencing intended outcomes and to identify how quality improvement collaboratives may result in improved adherence to evidence-based practices. Methods We built an initial conceptual framework to drive our enquiry, focusing on three context domains: health facility setting; project-specific factors; wider organisational and external factors; and two further domains pertaining to mechanisms: intra-organisational and inter-organisational changes. We systematically searched five databases and grey literature for publications relating to quality improvement collaboratives in a healthcare setting and containing data on context or mechanisms. We analysed and reported findings thematically and refined the programme theory. Results We screened 962 abstracts of which 88 met the inclusion criteria, and we retained 32 for analysis. Adequacy and appropriateness of external support, functionality of quality improvement teams, leadership characteristics and alignment with national systems and priorities may influence outcomes of quality improvement collaboratives, but the strength and quality of the evidence is weak. Participation in quality improvement collaborative activities may improve health professionals’ knowledge, problem-solving skills and attitude; teamwork; shared leadership and habits for improvement. Interaction across quality improvement teams may generate normative pressure and opportunities for capacity building and peer recognition. Conclusion Our review offers a novel programme theory to unpack the complexity of quality improvement collaboratives by exploring the relationship between context, mechanisms and outcomes. There remains a need for greater use of behaviour change and organisational psychology theory to improve design, adaptation and evaluation of the collaborative quality improvement approach and to test its effectiveness. Further research is needed to determine whether certain contextual factors related to capacity should be a precondition to the quality improvement collaborative approach and to test the emerging programme theory using rigorous research designs.

What are the features of high-performing quality improvement collaboratives? A qualitative case study of a state-wide collaboratives programme

How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review

Influence of a quality improvement learning collaborative program on team functioning in primary healthcare.

Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review

Integrating Implementation Science in a Quality and Patient Safety Improvement Learning Collaborative: Essential Ingredients and Impact

What are the reasons for clinical network success? A qualitative study

How to sustainably build capacity in quality improvement within a healthcare organisation: a deep-dive, focused qualitative analysis

Case Study: West End Quality Improvement Collaboration

Improving the Quality of Care in Care Homes Using the Quality Improvement Collaborative Approach: Lessons Learnt from Six Projects Conducted in the UK and The Netherlands

Quality improvement in surgical collaboratives: Characterizing resources and care variation to facilitate implementation and dissemination

Team structure and quality improvement in collaborative environments

The Irish national chronic obstructive pulmonary disease quality improvement collaborative: an adaptive learning collaborative

The Healthy Weight Collaborative: Quality Improvement Methods Promoting Healthy Weight

How social networks influence the local implementation of initiatives developed in quality improvement collaboratives in health care

Evaluation of a learning collaborative to advance team-based care in Federally Qualified Health Centers

Interdisciplinary quality improvement in the perioperative program. A collaborative model

Complexity, co-creation and social practices : re-constructing quality improvement : a case study in mental health

Facilitators of interdepartmental quality improvement: a mixed-methods analysis of a collaborative to improve pediatric community-acquired pneumonia management

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the collaborative method: reflections from a single site

Improving primary care team functioning through evidence based quality improvement: A comparative case study

How social networks influence the local implementation of initiatives developed in quality improvement collaboratives in health care: A qualitative process study