Performance evaluation of nine reference centers for effective surveillance of -infected Phlebotomine sand flies and basis for technical recommendations
Jorian PRUDHOMME,Aymeric Delabarre,Bulent Alten,Umut Berberoglu,Eduardo Berriatua,Gioia Bongiorno,José Manuel Cristovao,Maya Davidovich-Cohen,Trentina Di Muccio,Ozge Erisoz Kasap,Eleonora Fiorentino,Oscar D. Kirstein,Edwin Kniha,Carla Maia,Mesut Mungan,Clara Muñoz-Hernández,Muhammed Nalçaci,Gizem Oguz Kaskan,Yusuf Ozbel,Seray Ozensoy Toz,Ricardo Parreira,Katharina Platzgummer,Ceylan Polat,José Risueño,Liora Studentsky,Gamze Varol,Julia Walochnik,Kardelen Yetişmiş,Florence Robert-Gangneux
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.19.24313901
2024-09-22
Abstract:Background: Leishmaniasis, caused by protozoan parasites transmitted by Phlebotomine sand flies, is a significant public health concern in the Mediterranean basin. Effective monitoring of Leishmania-infected sand flies requires standardized tools for comparing their distribution and infection prevalence. Consistent quantitative PCR (qPCR) conditions and efficient DNA extraction protocols are crucial for reliable results over time and across regions. However, there is currently a lack of technical recommendations for DNA detection, which needs to be addressed. This study aimed to compare various DNA extraction protocols and conduct a qPCR based External Quality Assessment (EQA) through a multicenter study involving nine reference laboratories. Methodology/Principal findings: EQA samples were prepared using and strains, at different concentration from 101 to 104 parasites/mL and distributed to participating centers. All centers, except one, detected all concentrations, demonstrating diagnostic proficiency. The ability to detect low concentrations highlighted the robustness of the qPCR assay used, although Cq value variations suggested differences in sensitivity due to technical capabilities and/or extraction kit performances. Reported comparative analysis of seven DNA extraction methods identified the EZ1 DSP Virus® Kit and QIAamp® DNA mini-kit as the most efficient, supporting their use for standardized protocols. The study also evaluated the impact of lyophilization and shipment conditions, finding no compromise in detection, despite slight Cq value variations. In addition to EQA samples, experimentally infected sand fly have been included to mimic sample field condition. All centers detected positive samples, with variable Cq values, reflecting differences in individual infection load. Conclusion and significance: Overall, the study underscores the importance of standardized protocols and continuous quality assurance to maintain high diagnostic validity, crucial for effective surveillance of leishmaniasis, especially in field settings with low infection densities. Continuous training and calibration are essential to ensure uniform diagnostic performance across laboratories, enhancing epidemiological surveillance and disease control strategies.