Collaboration for Firearm Injury Prevention
Marian E. Betz,Megan L. Ranney
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41208
2024-10-26
JAMA Network Open
Abstract:Firearms are the leading cause of deaths for children and adolescents aged 1 to 19 years, and numerous medical and public health organizations, as well as the US Surgeon General, have identified firearm violence as a public health crisis. The work by Weybright and colleagues 1 examines the experiences of handgun carrying among rural youths and highlights critical gaps in the types of questions researchers are asking—and the types of people they are inviting as partners. Secure firearm storage (including prevention of unsupervised access by youths) is recommended by medical, public health, and firearms organizations as a way to prevent firearm suicide, unintentional injury, theft, or violence toward others. Yet many middle school and high school students across the US report access to a firearm, with 36% of youths in a national sample reporting the ability to access a firearm within an hour. 2 We and others have previously described the importance of culturally competent messaging and conversations about firearm risk. 3 Understanding youths' knowledge about firearms, attitudes and beliefs toward firearm carriage and risky firearm use, and perceptions of risky firearm use and safe storage is an essential step forward, but these topics are poorly studied, particularly among rural youths. While urban youths have higher risks of firearm homicide, rural youths—across all races and ethnicities 4 —have elevated risks of firearm suicide and unintentional injury. The cause of injury (firearm) may be the same, but the social contexts are significantly different. We therefore commend Weybright et al 1 on completing a mixed-methods study of rural adolescents' experiences with and beliefs about firearms. In this sample of 93 adolescents (aged 12-19 years) participating in 4-H youth development programming in rural Washington state, 55.9% reported having ever carried a handgun, first carrying a handgun at around 11 years of age (similar to a prior multistate study 5 ). Interviews and focus groups, analyzed with attention to cultural norms at various levels (eg, individual, peer, family, and community), revealed generally positive views regarding responsible handgun use by adults (eg, with training and for purposes such as protection or recreation), as well as high attention to legality of behaviors, especially by adolescents. In understanding the results in the study by Weybright et al, 1 it is important to note that this research was conducted with youths already engaged in 4-H. An ample body of literature supports the strong positive effect of positive youth development programs (including 4-H, Big Brothers Big Sisters, and other programs that provide dedicated adult mentorship). We are working with 4-H based on the theory that they are positive influences on health-related norms, intentions, and behaviors in a community. These findings are consistent with prior work with 4-H showing that youths involved with 4-H are both aware of and invested in civic responsibility and firearm safety–related norms. 6 Nonetheless, we caution that these results may not be representative of all rural youths, any more than a mixed-methods study of urban youths in Big Brothers Big Sisters programming would be representative of all youths in a city. This study is notable for serving as an exemplar of the promising growth in collaborative, community-centered firearm injury prevention research across the country. We hope that this study, along with others, can inspire a wider variety of rigorous collaborations between public health or medical professionals, community members with a shared commitment to reducing firearm injury and death, and firearm instructors, retailers, organizations, and owners. Such collaborations could inspire a greater breadth of research questions and outcomes of interest, such as examining perceived positive aspects of firearm ownership and positive deviance, rather than focusing only on harms. The study is also notable for its funding source: the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It was made possible by the appropriation of funds from Congress to the CDC in 2020, for the first time in 24 years. These appropriations have, not surprisingly, correlated with a tremendous increase in the volume of research being done. 7 Contrary to some politicians' talking points, this study (and others, including ones that the 2 of us are involved in) highlight how collaborative firearm injury prevention research is not just possible but deeply necessary and illuminative—and shows how progress can be achieved. In sum, we are enthusiastic about this study as an exemplar of much-needed research on the firearm-related value systems, behaviors, and tendencies of people who are likely influencers in their rural social network. We laud the adolescents and their adult mentors who took part -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal