Abstract:The safe charge injection capacity and charge density of neural stimulating electrodes is based on empirical evidence obtained from stimulating feline cortices. Stimulation induced tissue damage may be caused by electrochemical or biological mechanisms. Separating these mechanisms requires greater understanding of charge transfer at the electrode-tissue interface. Clinical devices typically use a biphasic waveform with controlled current. Therefore, the charge injection mechanism and charge injection capacity of platinum was assessed on a commercial potentiostat by chronopotentiometry (controlled current stimulation). Platinum is a non-ideal electrode, charge injection by chronopotentiometry can be passed via capacitive and Faradaic mechanisms. Electrodes were tested under a variety of conditions to assess the impact on charge injection capacity. The change in electrode potential (charge injection capacity) was affected by applied charge density, pulse length, pulse polarity, electrode size, polishing method, electrolyte composition, and oxygen concentration. The safe charge injection capacity and charge density could be increased by changing the electrode-solution composition and stimulation parameters. However, certain conditions (e.g., acid polished electrodes) allowed the electrode to exceed the water electrolysis potential despite the stimulation protocol being deemed safe according to the Shannon plot. Multiple current pulses led to a shift or ratcheting in electrode potential due to changes in the electrode-solution composition. An accurate measure of safe charge injection capacity and charge density of an implantable electrode can only be obtained from suitable conditions (an appropriately degassed electrolyte and clinically relevant electrode structure). Cyclic voltammetric measurement of charge storage capacity can be performed on implantable electrodes, but will not provide information on electrode stability to multiple chronopotentiometric pulses. In contrast, chronopotentiometry will provide details on electrode stability, but the minimum time resolution of typical commercial potentiostats (ms range) is greater than used in a clinical stimulator (μs range) so that extrapolation to short stimulation pulses is required. Finally, an impedance test is typically used to assess clinical electrode performance. The impedance test is also based on a biphasic chronopotentiometic waveform where the measured potential is used to calculate an impedance value. Here it is shown that the measured potential is a function of many parameters (solution composition, electrode area, and surface composition). Subsequently, impedance test results allow electrode comparison and to indicate electrode failure, but use of Ohm's law to calculate an impedance value is not valid.

Does Charge Balancing Ensure the Safety of the Electrical Stimulation and Is It Power Efficientƒ

An electrode-impedance-aware neurostimulator IC that achieves low-power consumption and fast charge balance

Design and development of a low-cost biphasic charge-balanced functional electric stimulator and its clinical validation

A 3-mV Precision Dual-Mode-Controlled Fast Charge Balancing for Implantable Biphasic Neural Stimulators

An energy-efficient, adiabatic electrode stimulator with inductive energy recycling and feedback current regulation

Nonlinear effects at the electrode-tissue interface of deep brain stimulation electrodes

Model predictive controller of voltage dosage for safe and effective Electrochemical treatment of tumors

Mechanisms determining safety and performance of brain stimulating electrodes

Bioelectronic Direct Current Stimulation at the Transition Between Reversible and Irreversible Charge Transfer

Health-aware battery fast charging technique with zonal battery model using pulsed amplitude-width modulation and multi-step constant current constant voltage

A Dual-Mode Neural Stimulator with Two-Step Charge Balancing Scheme for Fast Residual Voltage Compensation

A Charge Balanced Neural Stimulator Silicon Chip for Human-Machine Interface

Research on safe charging strategy of lithium-ion battery based on three-electrode equivalent circuit model

Active recharge biphasic stimulation for the intraoperative monopolar review in deep brain stimulation

Using Chronopotentiometry to Better Characterize the Charge Injection Mechanisms of Platinum Electrodes Used in Bionic Devices

An Anodic Phase Can Facilitate Rather Than Weaken a Cathodic Phase to Activate Neurons in Biphasic-Pulse Axonal Stimulations

A Spinal Cord Stimulator Circuit with Combination of Two Charge Balancing Approaches Enabling 100% Charge Compensation

Charge-Mode Neural Stimulator With a Capacitor-Reuse Residual Charge Detector and Active Charge Balancing for Epileptic Seizure Suppression

Extending the understanding of Shannon's safe stimulation limit for platinum electrodes: biphasic charge-balanced pulse trains in unbuffered saline at pH = 1 to pH = 12

Design and Testing of a Novel, Low-Cost, Low-Voltage, Functional Electrical Stimulator

Energy efficient neural stimulation: coupling circuit design and membrane biophysics