Abstract:Climate change is predicted to have profound consequences for multispecies coexistence, and thus, patterns of biological diversity. These consequences will be mediated by direct and indirect impacts of environmental change on species’ vital rates and interactions. While the impacts of environmental change on individual species has received much attention to date, the consequences for coexistence mediated by changes in the strength and direction of multispecies interactions are not as well understood. To investigate how coexistence dynamics may be sensitive to environmental change, we conducted a field experiment in a diverse semi‐arid annual plant system. We imposed a water manipulation treatment in two sites that vary in aridity and associated rainfall. Focusing on four common annual plant species in these sites, we quantified the fecundity (seed production) of individuals in response to a gradient of intra‐ and interspecific competitor densities and aridity. We then used these fecundities to parameterize an annual plant population model and examine the influence of aridity and species identity on resultant coexistence dynamics (as a function of stabilizing niche differences and fitness inequalities). While the responses of some vital rates and competitive impacts to watering varied somewhat predictably across sites, coexistence metrics encapsulating changes in these vital rates and interaction strengths did not. Fitness inequalities among our focal species were driven largely by differences in sensitivity to competition, which were almost always much greater than the magnitude of stabilizing niche differences. These findings were surprising given observational evidence suggesting that these species do coexist at local scales in these natural communities. Synthesis. Our study is one of the first to explicitly consider the influence of environmental variation on the individual components of coexistence outcomes. We show that environmental change has the ability to influence coexistence not only through direct pathways (i.e., vital rates), but also indirect pathways (i.e., species interactions). Despite the consistency of many of the responses of these individual components to environmental variation, their combined influence on predictions of both current and future coexistence remains unclear. Our study is among the first to explicitly consider the influence of environmental variation on individual components of coexistence outcomes. We show that environmental change may influence coexistence not only through direct pathways (i.e., vital rates), but also indirect pathways (i.e., species interactions). Despite consistent responses of some components to environmental change, their combined influence on coexistence predictions remains unclear.

Weather influences survival probability in two coexisting mammals directly and indirectly via competitive asymmetry

Allometry reveals trade-offs between Bergmann’s and Allen’s rules, and different avian adaptive strategies for thermoregulation

Complex and Nonlinear Effects of Weather and Density on the Demography of Small Herbivorous Mammals

Selective effect of winter weather on a songbird's morphology depends on individual sex and winter condition

Effects of extreme weather on two sympatric Australian passerine bird species

The Bogert Effect and environmental heterogeneity

Distinct responses of niche and fitness differences to water availability underlie variable coexistence outcomes in semi‐arid annual plant communities

Timing of seasonal events is correlated with social network position in a wild mammal

Temperature-Dependent Competitive Outcomes between the Fruit Flies Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba

Climatic temperature and precipitation jointly influence body size in species of western rattlesnakes

Size‐mediated priority and temperature effects on intra‐cohort competition and cannibalism in a damselfly

Disentangling physiological and physical explanations for body size-dependent thermal tolerance

Geographic gradients in a functional trait: Drivers of body size and size diversity of ground invertebrate communities

Observed declines in body size have differential effects on survival and recruitment, but no effect on population growth in tropical birds

Selection counteracts developmental plasticity in body-size responses to climate change

The Extremely Small Body Size of Williamson’s Mouse Deer (tragulus Williamsoni) Allows Coexistence with Sympatric Larger Ungulates Through Temporal Avoidance

Extreme climatic events constrain space use and survival of a ground‐nesting bird

Climate Warming Has Divergent Physiological Impacts on Sympatric Lizards.

Artificially raised roost temperatures lead to larger body sizes in wild bats

Seasonal patterns in behavior and glucocorticoid secretion of a specialist Holarctic tree squirrel (Sciurus aberti)

Pervasive but lagged responses in the composition of small mammal communities to a century of climate change