Abstract:Background The experience of undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be anxiety provoking, particularly for pediatric patients and their families. Alternative methods to improve success and experiences without the use of sedation are needed. Objective This study aims to compare the effectiveness of a virtual reality (VR)—based simulation app (VR-MRI) with a standard preparatory manual (SPM) and a hospital-based Child Life Program (CLP) on success and anxiety during a simulated pediatric MRI scan. Our secondary aim is to compare caregivers’ reported anxiety, procedural data, caregiver usability, child satisfaction, and fun. Methods This unblinded, randomized, triple-arm clinical trial involved 92 children aged 4-13 years and their caregivers. Recruitment was conducted through posters, public libraries, community centers, and social media. At a 2-hour session, participants were instructed to prepare for a simulated MRI head scan using one of three randomly assigned preparation materials: the VR-MRI app, SPM, or the CLP. Data were collected before preparation, during a simulated MRI head scan, and after the simulated scan. The primary outcomes were the success of the simulated MRI scan (MoTrak head motion tracking system), and child-reported anxiety (Venham picture test). We secondarily measured caregivers’ reported anxiety (short State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), procedural data (minutes), usability (Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire), and child-reported satisfaction and fun (visual analog scales). Results A total of 84 participants were included in the final analysis (VR-MRI: 30/84, 36%; SPM: 24/84, 29%; and CLP: 30/84, 36%). There were no clinically significant differences between the groups in terms of success during the MRI simulation (P=.27) or the children’s reported anxiety at any timepoint (timepoint 1, P=.99; timepoint 2, P=.008; timepoint 3, P=.10). Caregivers reported being significantly more anxious after preparing with the manual than caregivers in the other 2 groups (P<.001). Child and caregiver anxiety had a significant relationship, increasing together with moderate effect (r84=0.421; P<.001). Participants using VR-MRI took the most time to prepare (P<.001) and participants using the manual took the least time (P<.001). No statistically significant relationships were found between time preparing and time completing the simulated assessment (P=.13). There were no differences found in ease of use (P=.99), ease of learning (P=.48), and usefulness (P=.11) between the groups; however, caregivers reported being significantly more satisfied with the VR-MRI app and CLP than SPM (P<.001). Children reported the most satisfaction with the CLP (P<.001). There were no differences in how much fun the preparation materials were perceived to be (P=.37). Conclusions Digital preparation experiences using VR-based media could be a viable solution to improve the success of nonsedated MRI scans, with outcomes comparable with hospital-based in-person preparatory programs. Future research should focus on validating the results in a real MRI setting. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03931382; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03931382

Strategies to improve the magnetic resonance imaging experience for autistic individuals: a cross-sectional study exploring parents and carers' experiences

Toward Autism-Friendly Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Exploring Autistic Individuals' Experiences of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans in the United Kingdom, a Cross-Sectional Survey

Child-centredness in paediatric magnetic resonance imaging: Information needs and experiences of children requiring magnetic resonance imaging and their parents

Individualised MRI training for paediatric neuroimaging: A child-focused approach

Impact of sensory design interventions on image quality, patient anxiety and overall patient experience at MRI

UK-based specialist dental professionals' experiences of working with autistic patients

Patients' Experience to MRI Examinations—A Systematic Qualitative Review With Meta‐Synthesis

Comparing a Virtual Reality–Based Simulation App (VR-MRI) With a Standard Preparatory Manual and Child Life Program for Improving Success and Reducing Anxiety During Pediatric Medical Imaging: Randomized Clinical Trial

Identifying autistic children: Priorities for research arising from a systematic review of parents' experiences of the assessment process

Student radiographers' confidence of adapting practice for autistic patients: A qualitative survey on the role of placement experiences

Factors influencing oral health behaviours, access and delivery of dental care for autistic children and adolescents: A mixed-methods systematic review

How healthcare systems are experienced by autistic adults in the United Kingdom: A meta-ethnography

Children Centered Care: child and parent perspectives on a multi-faceted concept for magnetic resonance imaging without anesthesia – a survey

Brain magnetic resonance imaging software to support dementia diagnosis in routine clinical practice: a barrier to adoption study in the National Health Service (NHS) England

The experiences of children with autism spectrum disorder, their caregivers and health care providers during day procedure: A mixed methods study

A sense of space in the core of the bore: Enhancing the MRI experience through use of spatial audio

"Respect the way I need to communicate with you": Healthcare experiences of adults on the autism spectrum

Approaches to improving mental health care for autistic children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A Multidisciplinary Approach: Investigating Sustainable Interventions to Enhance Assent and Reduce Withdrawal in Autistic Children during Medical Procedures

"I'm dealing with a health care system that doesn't get it": Barriers and facilitators to inclusive healthcare for autistic adults

Barriers to healthcare and self-reported adverse outcomes for autistic adults: a cross-sectional study