Biomechanical analysis on anterior transpedicular screw-fixation after two-level cervical corpectomy using finite element method
Jianqing Chen,Liujun Zhao,feng Qi,Jie Li,Yaxiong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2016.04.060
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the biomechanical properties of the anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) fixation and conventional anterior screw plate system (ACCF) in lower cervical spine using finite element method.Methods CT images (C2-T2) were obtained from a 22-year-old young man volunteer.The models of intact C3-T1 (intact group),ATPS fixation (ATPS group),and ACCF fixation (ACCF group) were established and analyzed by Mimics 16.0,Geomagic12.0,and ANSYS 14.0 softwares.The moment couple of 1 N· m were loaded on the upper surface and upper facet joint surfaces of C3.Under conditions of flexion,extension,lateral bending,and rotation study,the rang of motiom,Titanium mesh plant stress,end-plate stress,bone-screw stress were recorded,then compared them between two models.Results The intact model of lower cervical spine (C3-T1) was established,consisting of 245 363 elements and 350 340 nodes,and it was successfully validated with the previously reported cadaveric experimental data of Panjabi and Kallemeyn.Compared with intact model,the range of movement (ROM) for ATPS and ACCF are decreased:Bending (-72.9％,-47.8％),Extention (-57.9％,-23.7％),Later bending (-78.6％,-49.5％),Rotation (-58.5％,-41.0％).Compared with ACCF,the titanium plant stresses in ATPS:Bending (-33.3％),Extention (-23.2％),Later bending (-9.2％),Rotation (-18.2％).Compared with ACCF,C4 upper end-plate stress in ATPS:Bending (-18.5％),Extention (-23.1％),Later bending (-13.6％),Rotation (-22.0％);C7 lower end-plate stress in ATPS:Bending (-31.8％) Extention (-44.6％) Rotation (-55.2％) Later bending (-54.0％).Under later bending and rotation situation,no significant difference is discovered on bone-screw stress between ATPS and ACCF,but bone-screw stress is smaller in ATPS as compared with ACCF.With exception of individual difference,ATPS model's results better than ACCF in rang of motiom,Titanium mesh plant stress,end-plate stress,bone-screw stress.Conclusion ATPS construct biomechabical is more excellent than ACCF constuct and ATPS is a favorable fixation technology.