Standards for clinical trials for treating TB

P du Cros,J Greig,J-W C Alffenaar,G B Cross,C Cousins,C Berry,U Khan,P P J Phillips,G E Velásquez,J Furin,M Spigelman,J T Denholm,S S Thi,S Tiberi,G K L Huang,G B Marks,A Turkova,L Guglielmetti,K L Chew,H T Nguyen,C W M Ong,G Brigden,K P Singh,I Motta,C Lange,J A Seddon,B-T Nyang'wa,A K J Maug,M T Gler,K E Dooley,M Quelapio,B Tsogt,D Menzies,V Cox,C M Upton,A Skrahina,L McKenna,C R Horsburgh,K Dheda,B J Marais
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.23.0341
2023-12-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND: The value, speed of completion and robustness of the evidence generated by TB treatment trials could be improved by implementing standards for best practice.METHODS: A global panel of experts participated in a Delphi process, using a 7-point Likert scale to score and revise draft standards until consensus was reached.RESULTS: Eleven standards were defined: Standard 1, high quality data on TB regimens are essential to inform clinical and programmatic management; Standard 2, the research questions addressed by TB trials should be relevant to affected communities, who should be included in all trial stages; Standard 3, trials should make every effort to be as inclusive as possible; Standard 4, the most efficient trial designs should be considered to improve the evidence base as quickly and cost effectively as possible, without compromising quality; Standard 5, trial governance should be in line with accepted good clinical practice; Standard 6, trials should investigate and report strategies that promote optimal engagement in care; Standard 7, where possible, TB trials should include pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic components; Standard 8, outcomes should include frequency of disease recurrence and post-treatment sequelae; Standard 9, TB trials should aim to harmonise key outcomes and data structures across studies; Standard 10, TB trials should include biobanking; Standard 11, treatment trials should invest in capacity strengthening of local trial and TB programme staff.CONCLUSION: These standards should improve the efficiency and effectiveness of evidence generation, as well as the translation of research into policy and practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?