Secondary cytogenetic abnormalities in core-binding factor AML harboring inv(16) vs t(8;21)
Se Young Han,Krzysztof Mrózek,Jenna Voutsinas,Qian Wu,Elizabeth A Morgan,Hanne Vestergaard,Robert Ohgami,Philip M Kluin,Thomas Kielsgaard Kristensen,Sheeja Pullarkat,Michael Boe Møller,Ana-Iris Schiefer,Linda B Baughn,Young Kim,David Czuchlewski,Jacobien R Hilberink,Hans-Peter Horny,Tracy I George,Michelle Dolan,Nam K Ku,Cecilia Arana Yi,Vinod Pullarkat,Jessica Kohlschmidt,Amandeep Salhotra,Lori Soma,Clara D Bloomfield,Dong Chen,Wolfgang R Sperr,Guido Marcucci,Christina Cho,Cem Akin,Jason Gotlib,Sigurd Broesby-Olsen,Melissa Larson,Michael A Linden,H Joachim Deeg,Gregor Hoermann,Miguel-Angel Perales,Jason L Hornick,Mark R Litzow,Ryotaro Nakamura,Daniel Weisdorf,Gautam Borthakur,Gerwin Huls,Peter Valent,Celalettin Ustun,Cecilia C S Yeung,Se young Han,Elizabeth A. Morgan,Philip M. Kluin,Linda B. Baughn,Jacobien R. Hilberink,Tracy I. George,Nam K. Ku,Clara D. Bloomfield,Wolfgang R. Sperr,Michael A. Linden,H. Joachim Deeg,Jason L. Hornick,Mark R. Litzow,Cecilia C. S. Yeung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003605
IF: 7.642
2021-05-18
Blood Advances
Abstract:Abstract Patients with core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), caused by either t(8;21)(q22;q22) or inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22), have higher complete remission rates and longer survival than patients with other subtypes of AML. However, ∼40% of patients relapse, and the literature suggests that patients with inv(16) fare differently from those with t(8;21). We retrospectively analyzed 537 patients with CBF-AML, focusing on additional cytogenetic aberrations to examine their impact on clinical outcomes. Trisomies of chromosomes 8, 21, or 22 were significantly more common in patients with inv(16)/t(16;16): 16% vs 7%, 6% vs 0%, and 17% vs 0%, respectively. In contrast, del(9q) and loss of a sex chromosome were more frequent in patients with t(8;21): 15% vs 0.4% for del(9q), 37% vs 0% for loss of X in females, and 44% vs 5% for loss of Y in males. Hyperdiploidy was more frequent in patients with inv(16) (25% vs 9%, whereas hypodiploidy was more frequent in patients with t(8;21) (37% vs 3%. In multivariable analyses (adjusted for age, white blood counts at diagnosis, and KIT mutation status), trisomy 8 was associated with improved overall survival (OS) in inv(16), whereas the presence of other chromosomal abnormalities (not trisomy 8) was associated with decreased OS. In patients with t(8;21), hypodiploidy was associated with improved disease-free survival; hyperdiploidy and del(9q) were associated with improved OS. KIT mutation (either positive or not tested, compared with negative) conferred poor prognoses in univariate analysis only in patients with t(8;21).
hematology