Abstract:Background: Surgical excision of the tumor remains the primary choice for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients, but it often leads to facial disfigurement, which further causes mutilation in the patients. Mutilation causes shame and stigma, which imparts significant psychological strain on patients, and tends to impair their quality of life. Objective: The present study aimed to assess the shame and stigma over long-term postoperative survival duration in head and neck cancer patients. Methodology: Total 100 postoperative patients of head and neck cancer were recruited from the outpatient department of the host institute, and shame and stigma was assessed using the Hindi version of the shame and stigma scale. Results: The global shame and stigma score was 22.67 ± 16.22, with the highest perceived stigma due to changes in appearance (11.94 ± 8.805), followed by impaired speech (4.490 ± 3.243), feeling of regret (3.950 ± 3.313), and feeling of stigma (4.490 ± 3.243). The shame and stigma was found to be significantly higher in maxillary cancer patients (33.22 ± 16.60), followed by larynx cancer patients (22.06 ± 13.41) and oral cancer patients (21.53 ± 16.49). Patients with stage III and stage IV of cancer were found to perceive higher shame and stigma (35.91 ± 22.23 and 27.36 ± 14.71, respectively) compared to the patients having stage I and stage II cancer (9.583 ± 9.709 and 16.44 ± 11.82, respectively). A significantly declining linear trend was found between shame and stigma and postoperative survival duration. Conclusion: We concluded that shame and stigma act as important determinants of quality of life over long-term survival in head and neck cancer patients, and should be considered while designing psychological interventions and surgical reconstruction protocols. The present study will help clinicians to assess the mutilation among head and neck cancer patients in a better way and will help in devising new psychological strategies to manage psychological aspects associated with mutilation, which will ultimately enhance the quality of life of patients.

A Discourse of Deviance: Blame, Shame, Stigma and the Social Construction of Head and Neck Cancer

Contemporary visualities of ill health: On the social (media) construction of disease regimes

Dysphagia and Dysphonia After Head and Neck Cancer

Survivorship and discourses of identity

Discursive construction of the patient in online clinical cancer pathways information

Stigma, Communication, and Clinical Oncology Care: Three Case Studies

The Social Reality of Meaning Making: The Dichotomy in the Illness Narratives of Women With Breast Cancer and Biomedical Practitioners in Nigeria

Women’s Construction of Embodiment and the Abject Sexual Body After Cancer

The political stakes of cancer epistemics

Head and neck cancer survivorship consensus statement from the American Head and Neck Society

Making Sense of Gynecologic Cancer: A Relational Dialectics Approach

Conspiracy of Silence in Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis: A Scoping Review

Communicating without a Shared Language: A Qualitative Study of Language Barriers in Language-Discordant Cancer Communication

[Male vulnerabilities and stereotypes in the social representations of prostate cancer]

Interventions to Reduce Psychosocial Burden in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review

Constructions of Decision Making for Risk-Reducing Mastectomy

"It's Okay to Critique the System That Claims to Save Us"

Shame and Stigma Over Long-Term Survival in Postoperative Cases of Head and Neck Cancer

Latency of breast cancer stigma during survivorship and its influencing factors: A qualitative study

Interpreting Cancer Survivors’ Perceptions of the Survivor Label Through Social Identity and Communication Accommodation Theories

Factors associated with shame and stigma among head and neck cancer patients: a cross-sectional study