Perceived Stress, Psychological Flexibility Profiles, and Mental Health During COVID-19: A Latent Profile Analysis
Yuhong Deng,Pengfei Huang,Qiang Yang,Baojuan Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S409395
IF: 3.974
2023-05-20
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Yuhong Deng, 1 Pengfei Huang, 1 Qiang Yang, 2 Baojuan Ye 1 1 School of Psychology, School of Education, Center of Mental Health Education and Research, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China; 2 School of Education, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Baojuan Ye, School of Psychology, School of Education, Center of Mental Health Education and Research, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China, Email Purpose: Although the link between psychological flexibility and healthy functioning has been widely analyzed, the employed measurements often lacked accuracy. The current study introduced a person-centered approach that identified subgroups of college students across the dimensions of the Personalized Psychological Flexibility Index (PPFI) and explored how these subgroups relate to a risk factor (perceived stress) and mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, negative affect, and positive affect) in the context of COVID-19. Methods: A sample of 659 participants ( M age = 19. 99, SD = 1.27; 57.97% females) completed the questionnaires online. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was employed to determine the optimal number of subgroups or profiles. Then, multinomial logistic regression and analyses of variance were used to identify variables associated with profile membership. Results: LPA identified three distinct profiles (active strategy, inconsistent strategy, and passive strategy). Furthermore, multinomial logistic regressions indicated that students with high perceived stress were more likely to be in the passive strategy group than the active strategy group ( β = − 0.104, OR = 0.901, p < 0.001) and the inconsistent strategy group ( β = − 0.087, OR = 0.917, p < 0.001). Additionally, analyses of variance revealed that the three profiles differed in depression ( η 2 = 0.062, p < 0.001), anxiety ( η 2 = 0.059, p < 0.001), negative affect ( η 2 = 0.047, p < 0.001), and positive affect ( η 2 = 0.048, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The current study employed LPA based on the PPFI to identify and confirm three profiles of psychological flexibility. We found that perceived stress and mental health outcomes were associated with these three profiles. This study offers a new perspective on understanding psychological flexibility through a person-centered approach. Furthermore, interventions aimed at reducing college students' perceived stress during the COVID-19 crisis are critical for preventing the deterioration of psychological flexibility. Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, Personalized Psychological Flexibility Index, stress, mental well-being, latent profile analysis The current outbreak of COVID-19, a novel coronavirus, has rapidly spread throughout the world. International concerns about health issues have arisen as a result of the ongoing coronavirus, which has posed serious threats to psychological health worldwide. 1–4 Because of their almost ubiquitous transition to restricted social interactions and online study, college students have been overwhelmingly impacted by the current COVID-19 health crisis. 5 Coping with these life transitions is often stressful and can exert a pronounced negative impact on students' well-being. 6 Thus, behaving in alignment with values may be more difficult and more likely to be psychologically inflexible. Psychological flexibility is described as "the pursuit of valued goals despite the presence of distress". 7 In the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) model of behavior change, one of the primary therapy goals is to increase psychological flexibility. 8 Numerous studies have shown that psychological flexibility is considered to be a key ingredient to psychological health and daily well-being. 7 Nevertheless, a lack of psychological flexibility contributes to a variety of negative psychological issues, including anxiety, depression, emotional distress, interpersonal distress, and other issues. 8–13 Based on the ACT model, researchers have developed various scales to assess psychological flexibility. There is no doubt that these commonly used measurements have important values and have contributed to our understanding of psychological flexibility, yet there are significant flaws and criticisms. In a nutshell, an increasing amount of empirical evidence has indicated that the measurement of psychological flexibility has primarily relied on scales with low construct validity and imprecise borders with negative e -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary