Abstract:This paper assesses the implications of existing research on the intra-household economy for current debates about the emergence of new forms of radically democratic intimate relationships in ‘late modern’ or ‘world risk’ society. The different ways in which couples organise money are particularly important in evaluating these debates because as Pahl (1989 , 1997 , 1999 ) argues, money can be seen as a tracer for other aspects of a couples' lives together, especially the power relationship between them. One of the groups currently thought to be in the vanguard of shifts to new forms of egalitarian and radically democratic intimate relationships are heterosexual cohabiting couples. So far however, there has been little, if any, research on the ways in which cohabiting couples organise money, particularly in Britain. This paper therefore assesses the possible implications of existing research on the intra-household economy amongst heterosexual couples in the UK and elsewhere, for the ways in which cohabiting couples may possibly be organising household money in Britain today, and what light this sheds on current debates about shifts towards greater equality in new forms of intimate relationships. One of the main questions underlying the discussion concerns the extent to which trends towards individualisation in intimate relationships are coming to be associated with greater sharing and equality in the distribution of financial resources, as Giddens' (1992) thesis would lead us to expect, or whether as Pahl (1999) and others ( Jamieson, 1999 ) have suggested, an increasing proportion of couples may now be coming to use individualised or privatised systems of money management which while enhancing individual control over finances, may nevertheless still be associated with the maintenance and reproduction of some very traditional gender inequalities between male and female partners, albeit in a new and apparently impersonal, ‘marketised’ form.

"We never lived together either": Couples' housing (re-) arrangements in later life

Everyday Life Experiences of Chinese Community-Dwelling Oldest Old Who Live Alone at Home

Perceived Housing in Relation to Retirement and Relocation: A Qualitative Interview Study among Older Adults

Spatial solidarity among older adults in age-related housing

Rooted in earth, rooted in community: Aging in rural houses of northern China

Living Arrangements of The Elderly: Social Participation and Life Satisfaction

The Happy Home: Ageing, Migration, and Housing in Relation to Older Migrants’ Subjective Wellbeing

The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place

Cohabiting Couples: Rethinking Money in the Household at the Beginning of the Twenty First Century

Precariously placed: Home, housing and wellbeing for older renters

Disabling Spaces and Spatial Strategies: Feminist Approaches to the Home Environment of Family Caregivers of People with Dementia

Shared Spaces and “throwntogetherness” in Later Life: A Qualitative GIS Study of Non-Migrant and Migrant Older Adults in Singapore

A Critical Approach to Aging in Place: A Case Study Comparison of Personal and Professional Perspectives from the Minneapolis Metropolitan Area

Cohabitation and Commitment: Partnership Plans of Young Men and Women

What Is Co-Housing? Developing a Conceptual Framework from the Studies of Danish Intergenerational Co-Housing

The Role of Housing in Facilitating Middle-Class Family Practices in China: A Case Study of Tianjin

Daily life after moving into a care home--experiences from older people, relatives and contact persons

Living arrangements, intergenerational support types and older adult loneliness in Eastern and Western Europe

Health and marital status of older Chinese couples and implications for intergenerational co-residence

Families in Later Life: A Decade in Review

Leaving Home and Living Alone: An Historical Perspective