Thoracic endovascular aortic repair as emergency therapy despite suspected aortic infection.

Arno Stellmes,R. V. von Allmen,U. Derungs,F. Dick,V. Makaloski,D. Do,J. Schmidli,M. Czerny
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivs539
2013-04-01
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Abstract:OBJECTIVES To evaluate thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) as emergency therapy despite suspected aortic infection. METHODS Within a 5-year period, we treated 6 patients with a strategy of primary TEVAR despite suspected aortic infection in patients with symptomatic or already ruptured thoracic aortic pathology. RESULTS In-hospital mortality was 16.7%. The reason for death was septic multiorgan failure. During follow-up, 2 patients were converted to secondary open surgery in a stable elective setting. The median follow-up was 42.5 months. All surviving patients are not receiving continuing antibiotic therapy. Freedom from infection is 100% to date. CONCLUSIONS TEVAR as emergency therapy despite suspected aortic infection is feasible and may well serve as a definite treatment option in selected cases. As recurring infection cannot be entirely excluded, life-long clinical and morphological surveillance remains mandatory.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?