Abstract:Background Machine learning (ML)-based predictive models for perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) undergoing non-cardiac surgery (NCS) have not been reported before. Methods Clinical data from 9171 consecutive adult patients with SCAD, who underwent NCS at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine between January 2013 and May 2023, were used to develop and validate the prediction models. MACEs were defined as all-cause death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke perioperatively. Compare various resampling and feature selection methods to deal with data imbalance. A traditional logistic regression (the Revised Cardiac Risk index, RCRI) and nine ML models (logistic regression, support vector machine, Gaussian Naive Bayes, random forest, GBDT, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost and best stacking ensemble model) were compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC). The calibration was assessed using the calibration curve and the patients’ net benefit was measured by decision curve analysis (DCA). Models were tested via 5-fold cross-validation. Feature importance was interpreted using SHapley Additive explanation (SHAP). Results Among 9171 patients, 514 (5.6%) developed MACEs. The XGBoost performed best in terms of AUROC (0.898) and AUPRC (0.479),which were better than the RCRI of AUROC (0.716) and AUPRC (0.185), Delong test and Permutation test P<0.001, respectively. The calibration curve of XGBoost performance accurately predicted the risk of MACEs (brier score 0.040), the DCA results showed that the XGBoost had a high net benefit for predicting MACEs. The top-ranked stacking ensemble model consisting of CatBoost, GBDT, GNB, and LR proved to be the best, with an AUROC value of 0.894 (95% CI 0.860-0.928) and an AUPRC value of 0.485 (95% CI 0.383-0.587). Using the mean absolute SHAP values, we identified the top 20 important features. Conclusion The first ML-based perioperative MACEs prediction models for patients with SCAD were successfully developed and validated. High-risk patients for MACEs can be effectively identified and targeted interventions can be made to reduce the incidence of MACEs. Lay Summary We performed a retrospective machine learning classification study of MACEs in patients with SCAD undergoing non-cardiac surgery to develop and validate an optimal prediction model. In this study, we analyzed the data missing mechanism and identified the best missing data interpolation method, while applying appropriate resampling techniques and feature selection methods for data imbalance characteristics, and ultimately identified 24 preoperative features for building a machine learning predictive model. Eight independent machine learning prediction models and stacking ensemble models were built, and the models were evaluated comprehensively using ROC curve, PRC curve, calibration plots and DCA curve. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170331), Joint Funds from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20337), and grants from the Key Research and Development Plan of Zhejiang Province (2020C03017) ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Committee of the the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (No. of ethical approval: IIT20230114A). Written informed consent was waived owing to the nature of the retrospective study design and the collected data was managed in a de-identified form. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes * NCS : non-cardiac surgery SCAD : stable coronary artery disease MACEs : major adverse cardiovascular events MI : myocardial infarction HF : heart failure RCRI : Revised Cardiac Risk index ML : Machine learning AI : artificial intelligence ECG : electrocardiogram FAHZU : First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine TRIPOD : Transparent Reporting of Multivariable Prediction Models for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis STROBE : STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology ACC : American College of Cardiology AHA : American Heart Association ICD-10 : International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition BMI : Body Mass Index DOS : duration of surgery GA : general anesthesia AQW : abnormal Q waves ST-Ta : ST-T wave abnormalities LVEF : left ventricular ejection fraction RWMA : regional wall motion abnormality LVDD : left ventricle diastolic dysfunction PH : pulmonary hypertension Hb : Hemoglobin FBG : Fasting blood glucose Scr : Creatinine ASA PS : American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status IR : imbalance ratio AUROC : area under the receiver operating characteristic curve AUPRC : area under the precision and recall curve SMOTE : Synthetic minority over-sampling technique ADASYN : adaptive synthetic ENN : Edited Nearest Neighbors XGBoost : eXtreme Gradient Boosting CFS : correlation-based feature selection RFE : recursive feature elimination SHAP : SHapley Additive exPlanation LightGBM : Light Gradient Boosting Machine RF : Random Forest LR : logistic regression SVM : support vector machine GNB : Gaussian Naïve Bayesian GBDT : gradient boosting decision tree CatBoost : categorical boosting ROC : receiver-operating characteristic PRC : curves and precision–recall curves DCA : decision curve analysis SD : standard deviation IQR : interquartile range KNN : k-Nearest Neighbor IHD : Ischemic heart disease FS : fractional shortening LVDs : left ventricular end systolic dimension eGFR : Estimated glomerular filtration rate TSP : Total serum protein ALB : Albumin ChE : Cholinesterase TB : Total bilirubin tCa : Total calcium FB : Fibrinogen VIF : variance inflation factor MCAR : missing completely at random MAR : missing at random MNAR : missing not at random

Machine learning based peri-surgical risk calculator for abdominal related emergency general surgery: a multicenter retrospective study

Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm Using Electronic Health Record Data to Predict Postoperative Complications and Report on a Mobile Platform

Integrating machine learning predictions for perioperative risk management: Towards an empirical design of a flexible-standardized risk assessment tool

Advancing Emergency Department Triage Prediction With Machine Learning to Optimize Triage for Abdominal Pain Surgery Patients

Prediction of intensive care unit admission (>24h) after surgery in elective noncardiac surgical patients using machine learning algorithms

Prediction of postoperative sepsis mortality risk based on machine learning in patients undergoing abdominal surgery

Risk of Intraoperative Hemorrhage During Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy Surgery: Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Prediction Modelresearch in Context

Comparing Clinical Judgment with MySurgeryRisk Algorithm for Preoperative Risk Assessment: A Pilot Study

Application of machine learning algorithms to predict postoperative surgical site infections and surgical site occurrences following inguinal hernia surgery

A novel risk score for in-hospital perioperative mortality of five major surgeries

Development of a novel machine learning-based predictive risk calculator for radical cystectomy.

Development and preliminary assessment of a machine learning model to predict myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest after major operations

Establishment of Model for Predicting Mortality Risk after Abdominal Surgery Using Preoperative Indices Based on Different Machine Learning Algorithms

Machine learning-based predictive models for perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery

Optimizing Cardiac Surgery Risk Prediction: an Machine Learning Approach with Counterfactual Explanations.

Prediction Model of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology Using Machine Learning Algorithm

Machine learning and postoperative complications: Determining risk before surgery in patients with cancer.

A Non-Linear Ensemble Model-Based Surgical Risk Calculator for Mixed Data from Multiple Surgical Fields

Development, External Validation, and Visualization of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Occurrence of Acute Kidney Injury after Cardiac Surgery

Development of a machine learning algorithm to predict complications of total laparoscopic anterior resection and natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in rectal cancer

Development and Validation of an Ensemble Learning Risk Model for Sepsis after Abdominal Surgery