0587 Adherence and Quality of Life of Patients with Sleep Disordered Breathing Treated with Automatic Servo-Ventilation

Sarah Bass,Jeff Jasko,William Hardy,Chuck Cain,Michael Arzt,Winifried Randerath
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0587
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Automatic servo-ventilation (Auto SV) treats Central sleep apnea (CSA) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by monitoring airflow and intervening with changes or pauses in airflow patterns. Evidence on adherence to Auto SV therapy and its effects on symptoms, sleep quality and quality of life (QOL) in real world Auto SV users is sparse. The aim of this registry study was to describe the adherence to Auto SV (Philips DreamStation BiPAP auto SV) and to evaluate Auto SV therapy effects on sleepiness, sleep quality and QOL. Methods Data were collected at six sites across Germany from 2018 through 2023 at 6, 12, and/or 24 months. Auto SV adherence data were collected through Philips EncoreAnywhereTM (EA) software and examined according to intent-to-treat and subgroup analyses accounting for data gaps. Average adherence was calculated from the first to the final date of first device usage. Sleepiness, sleep quality and general QOL were assessed with the Epworth Sleep Scale (ESS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the European Quality of Life-5 level questionnaire (EQ 5D-5L), respectively. Changes from baseline (CFB) were calculated for questionnaires collected at enrollment and at visits at 6, 12 and 24 months (Mixed-Models including Sidak adjustment). Results One hundred and twenty-five participants were enrolled. Average age was 65 ± 12 years; 106 (85%) were males. Average adherence over days used was 6.0 ± 1.9 hours/day (n = 103) and 5.0 ± 2.4 hours/day (n = 103) among all days (average follow-up 478 days). Percent days used averaged 78.5 ± 27.1%. ESS and global PSQI scores showed significant improvement from baseline at 24 months in completed-cases and last-observation-carried-forward analyses (ESS [Mean difference: CC -1.9 ± 3.9 (N=57), LOCF -1.8 ± 4.5 (N=103), p ≤0.001], PSQI [Mean difference: CC -1.7± 3.5, LOCF (N=55), -1.6 ± 3.5 (N=98), p < 0.001]). The EQ-5D-5L did not significantly differ from baseline. Conclusion Auto SV use averaged 5 hours per night and Auto SV significantly improved sleepiness and sleep quality, but not general QOL, in a real-world sleep clinic population. ESS approached clinical significance (MCID 2.0) while the PSQI did not (MCID 3). Support (if any)
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?