Structure-Oriented Research on the Antiestrogenic Effect of Organophosphate Esters and the Potential Mechanism

Juan Li,Huiming Cao,Yunsong Mu,Guangbo Qu,Aiqian Zhang,Jianjie Fu,Guibin Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04376
2020-10-29
Abstract:Organophosphate esters (OPEs) can exhibit various toxicities including endocrine disruption activity. Unfortunately, the low-dose endocrine-disrupting effects mediated by estrogen receptors (ERs) are commonly underestimated for OPEs and their metabolites. Here, structure-oriented research was performed to investigate the estrogenic/antiestrogenic effect of 13 OPEs (including three metabolites) and the potential mechanism. All of the OPEs exerted antiestrogenic activities in both E-screen and MVLN assays. OPEs with bulky substituents, such as phenyl rings (triphenyl phosphate (TPP), tricresyl phosphate (TCP), diphenylphosphoryl chloride, and diphenylphosphite) or relatively long alkyl chains (dibutylbutylphosphonate (DBBP)), exerted relatively strong ER antagonism potency at micromolar concentrations. The established quantitative structure–activity relationship indicated that the antiestrogenic activities of the OPEs mainly depended on the volume, leading eigenvalue, and hydrophobicity of the molecule. Molecular docking revealed that the three OPEs with the bulkiest substituents on the phosphate ester group (TPP, TCP, and DBBP) have a similar interaction mode to the classical ER antagonist 4-hydroxytamoxifen. The correlation between the antiestrogenic activity and the corresponding ER binding affinity was statistically significant, strongly suggesting that the OPEs possess the classical antagonism mechanism of interfering with the positioning of helix 12 in the ER.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c04376?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c04376</a>.Docking scores, molecular parameters, and activity data of OPEs (Table S1); RNA isolation and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Part 1); the process of QSAR development and the robustness of the QSAR model (Part 2); antiproliferation effect of each OPE in the E-screen assay under single exposure scenario (Figure S1); antiluciferase activities of OPEs after cotreatment with E2 in the MVLN assay (Figure S2); empirical distribution of <i>R</i><sup>2*</sup> for the PEC<sub>50</sub> model in the antiproliferation activity of OPEs (cotreatment with E2) in the E-screen assay (Figure S3); empirical distribution of <i>R</i><sup>2*</sup> for the PEC<sub>50</sub> model in the antiluciferase activity of OPEs (exposure alone) in the MVLN assay (Figure S4); empirical distribution of <i>R</i><sup>2*</sup> for the PEC<sub>50</sub> model in the antiluciferase activity of OPEs (cotreatment with E2) in the MVLN assay (Figure S5); and the binding modes of five OPE molecules in hERα-LBD (Figure S6) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.est.0c04376/suppl_file/es0c04376_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?