Body clocks: Time for the Nobel Prize
C. Dibner,Ulrich Schibler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13024
IF: 7.523
2018-02-01
Acta Physiologica
Abstract:Already in 1729, Jean-Jacques d’Ortous de Mairan, a French astronomer, noticed that the mimosa plants in his backyard opened and closed their leaves at similar times during the day. Intriguingly, these daily cycles of leaf movements persisted in plants kept in nearly constant darkness (Figure 1), and de Mairan thus concluded that they must be driven by endogenous clocks rather than environmental light-dark cycles. In the meantime, self-sustained circadian oscillators have been found in nearly all light-sensitive organisms from cyanobacteria to mammals. In the latter. they influence most aspects of physiology and behaviour and thus play essential roles in health and disease. Molecular research on these biological timekeepers has been initiated in the 1980s in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster by Jeffrey Hall, Michael Rosbash, and Michael Young, and their discovery of the first clock genes has been honoured with the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. As elaborated below, the Drosophila and mammalian clocks are very similar, and the work on Drosophila clocks has been pivotal in the identification of mammalian clock genes and in their functional analysis (Figure 1). The molecular work by the three Nobel Prize awardees is based on genetic studies conducted in the early 1970s by Ronald Konopka and Seymour Benzer. The latter already played a pivotal role in the functional definition of a gene. By generating a large number of T4 recombinant strains with mutations in the rII gene, he concluded in the 1950s that the gene must have a linear structure and that the minimal unit of recombination is one nucleotide. Some years later, he became fascinated by the behaviour, in particular phototaxis, of Drosophila melanogaster. His new research direction to study the fly brain was neither approved nor understood by his most famous colleagues. His mom was worried as well: “From this you can make a living?” she wondered. This did not, however, discourage Benzer to continue his ambitious scientific endeavours. Ron Konopka, Benzer’s graduate student at that time, initiated a genetic screen for genes on the X chromosome affecting circadian behaviour. This screen was both risky and elegant. It was risky, because the X chromosome might not encompass genes relevant for the phenotype of interest. But if such X chromosome-linked genes indeed existed, the screening strategy was elegant for two reasons. First, males only contain one X chromosome, and the examination of male flies should thus reveal even recessive mutations. Second, fruit flies were known to have a highly robust circadian eclosion rhythm. Hence, chemically mutagenized male flies emerging from their pupae “at the wrong time” (after a few rounds of genetic purification) were likely to carry a “circadian timing mutation” on the X chromosome. To the excitement of Konopka and Benzer, the study culminated in a dream result, in that a single locus, period (per), carried mutations causing short-period rhythms (per), long-period rhythms (per), and arrhythmicity (per). Pleasingly, the same mutations also engendered corresponding changes in the rhythms of locomotor activity, indicating that one and the same clock drives different physiological outputs. This fundamental discovery by Benzer and Konopka reached far beyond chronobiology. It represented the first experimental demonstration that defined Mendelian loci participate in determining phenotypic traits as complex as behaviour (Figure 1). In 1984, Jeffrey Hall and Michael Rosbash at Brandeis University physically isolated the Drosophila per gene by positional cloning and thereby provided compelling evidence for per being directly responsible for circadian behaviour. Moreover, they demonstrated that the accumulation of per mRNA and PER protein exhibits a high-amplitude circadian oscillation even in flies kept in constant darkness. Even more importantly, the authors postulated that this cycle is driven by a negative feedback loop (Figure 1), a concept that has stood the test of time in many organisms from cyanobacteria to humans. Almost simultaneously, Michael Young also cloned the per gene and connected its mutants to circadian behaviour. These pioneering studies reported that circadian locomotor and eclosion rhythms can be restored upon introduction of cloned per sequences into the genome of arrhythmic per null flies. During the following years Young and coworkers discovered timeless (tim), another essential core clock gene, and demonstrated that its protein product formed a heterodimer with PER. Moreover, Young’s laboratory found that PER phosphorylation by the Doubletime protein kinase regulated PER stability and thus critically affected the period length of the Drosophila clock. Mammalian core clock genes have escaped detection and isolation until the late 1990s. Many of us remember 1997 as the year of mammalian clock molecular biology. In this year, Joseph Takahashi, then at Northwestern University in Chicago and now at UT South Western Medical Center in Dallas, published the results of a heroic forward genetic screen of mice whose gametes were DOI: 10.1111/apha.13024