Holobiont Traits Shape Climate Change Responses in Cryptic Coral Lineages
Carsten G. B. Grupstra,Kirstin S. Meyer‐Kaiser,Matthew‐James Bennett,Maikani O. Andres,David J. Juszkiewicz,James E. Fifer,Jeric P. Da‐Anoy,Kelly Gomez‐Campo,Isabel Martinez‐Rugerio,Hannah E. Aichelman,Alexa K. Huzar,Annabel M. Hughes,Hanny E. Rivera,Sarah W. Davies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17578
IF: 11.6
2024-11-29
Global Change Biology
Abstract:Rising seawater temperatures threaten reef‐building corals; yet some genetically distinct but morphologically similar (i.e., cryptic) coral populations can be specialized to extreme (high‐temperature) habitats and thrive under stressful conditions, with important repercussions for reef conservation. We identify cryptic lineages of a widely distributed Pacific coral genus that thrive on extreme reefs. These corals associate with unique microbial partners, differ in terms of light harvesting efficiency and are more tolerant to rising water temperatures than those inhabiting non‐extreme reefs. Resolving coral lineages can strengthen our understanding of coral evolution and symbiosis and support global conservation and restoration efforts. As ocean warming threatens reefs worldwide, identifying corals with adaptations to higher temperatures is critical for conservation. Genetically distinct but morphologically similar (i.e. cryptic) coral populations can be specialized to extreme habitats and thrive under stressful conditions. These corals often associate with locally beneficial microbiota (Symbiodiniaceae photobionts and bacteria), obscuring the main drivers of thermal tolerance. Here, we leverage a holobiont (massive Porites) with high fidelity for C15 photobionts to investigate adaptive variation across classic ("typical" conditions) and extreme reefs characterized by higher temperatures and light attenuation. We uncovered three cryptic lineages that exhibit limited micro‐morphological variation; one lineage dominated classic reefs (L1), one had more even distributions (L2), and a third was restricted to extreme reefs (L3). L1 and L2 were more closely related to populations ~4300 km away, suggesting that some lineages are widespread. All corals harbored Cladocopium C15 photobionts; L1 and L2 shared a photobiont pool that differed in composition between reef types, yet L3 mostly harbored unique photobiont strains not found in the other lineages. Assemblages of bacterial partners differed among reef types in lineage‐specific ways, suggesting that lineages employ distinct microbiome regulation strategies. Analysis of light‐harvesting capacity and thermal tolerance revealed adaptive variation underpinning survival in distinct habitats: L1 had the highest light absorption efficiency and lowest thermal tolerance, suggesting that it is a classic reef specialist. L3 had the lowest light absorption efficiency and the highest thermal tolerance, showing that it is an extreme reef specialist. L2 had intermediate light absorption efficiency and thermal tolerance, suggesting that is a generalist lineage. These findings reveal diverging holobiont strategies to cope with extreme conditions. Resolving coral lineages is key to understanding variation in thermal tolerance among coral populations, can strengthen our understanding of coral evolution and symbiosis, and support global conservation and restoration efforts.
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology