Abstract:Background: The availability of increasingly powerful large language models (LLMs) has attracted substantial interest in their potential for interpreting and generating human-like text for biomedical and clinical applications. However, there are often demands for high accuracy, concerns about balancing generalizability and domain-specificity, and questions about prompting robustness when considering the adoption of LLMs for specific use cases. There also is a lack of a framework or method to help choose which LLMs (or prompting strategies) should be adopted for specific biomedical or clinical tasks. Objective: To address the speculations on applying LLMs for biomedical applications, this study aims to 1) propose a framework to comprehensively evaluate and compare the performance of a range of LLMs and prompting techniques on a suite of biomedical natural language processing (NLP) tasks; 2) use the framework to benchmark several general- purpose LLMs and biomedical domain-specific LLMs. Methods: We evaluated and compared six general-purpose LLMs (GPT-4, GPT-3.5-Turbo, Flan-T5-XXL, Llama-3-8B-Instruct, Yi-1.5-34B-Chat, and Zephyr-7B-Beta) and three healthcare-specific LLMs (Medicine-Llama3-8B, Meditron-7B, and MedLLaMA-13B) on a set of 13 datasets - referred to as the Biomedical Language Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark (BLURB) - covering six commonly needed medical natural language processing tasks: named entity recognition (NER); relation extraction (RE); population, interventions, comparators, and outcomes (PICO); sentence similarity (SS); document classification (Class.); and question-answering (QA). All models were evaluated without further training or fine-tuning. Model performance was assessed according to a range of prompting strategies (formalized as a systematic, reusable prompting framework) and relied on the standard, task-specific evaluation metrics defined by BLURB. Results: Across all tasks, GPT-4 outperformed other LLMs, achieving a score of 64.6 on the benchmark, though other models, such as Flan-T5-XXL and Llama-3-8B-Instruct, demonstrated competitive performance on multiple tasks. We found that general-purpose models achieved better overall scores than domain-specific models, sometimes by significant margins. We observed a substantial impact of strategically editing the prompt describing the task and a consistent improvement in performance when including examples semantically similar to the input text. Additionally, the most performant prompts for nearly half the models outperformed the previously reported best results for the PubMedQA dataset from the BLURB leaderboard. Conclusions: These results provide evidence of the potential LLMs may have for biomedical applications and highlight the importance of robust evaluation before adopting LLMs for any specific use cases. Notably, performant open-source LLMs such as Llama-3- 8B-Instruct and Flan-T5-XXL show promise for use cases where trustworthiness and data confidentiality are concerns, as these models can be hosted locally, offering better security, transparency, and explainability. Continuing to explore how these emerging technologies can be adapted for the healthcare setting, paired with human expertise, and enhanced through quality control measures will be important research to allow responsible innovation with LLMs in the biomedical area.

Prompt engineering: The next big skill in rheumatology research

Prompt engineering paradigms for medical applications: scoping review and recommendations for better practices

Prompt Engineering as an Important Emerging Skill for Medical Professionals: Tutorial

AI am a rheumatologist: a practical primer to large language models for rheumatologists

Improving the use of LLMs in radiology through prompt engineering: from precision prompts to zero-shot learning

Prompt Engineering Paradigms for Medical Applications: Scoping Review

Large Language Model Prompting Techniques for Advancement in Clinical Medicine

Prompt engineering on leveraging large language models in generating response to InBasket messages

An Empirical Evaluation of Prompting Strategies for Large Language Models in Zero-Shot Clinical Natural Language Processing: Algorithm Development and Validation Study

Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering in Large Language Models: a comprehensive review

Toward Large Language Models as a Therapeutic Tool: Comparing Prompting Techniques to Improve GPT-Delivered Problem-Solving Therapy

Large language models: rheumatologists' newest colleagues?

Diagnostic reasoning prompts reveal the potential for large language model interpretability in medicine

Evaluation of Large Language Model Performance on the Biomedical Language Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark : Comparative Study

Promptwise: Prompt Engineering Paradigm for Enhanced Patient-Large Language Model Interactions Towards Medical Education

Prompt engineering in consistency and reliability with the evidence-based guideline for LLMs

Large language models and rheumatology: are we there yet?

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Prompt Engineering: A Primer for Orthopaedic Surgeons

Prompt engineering with a large language model to assist providers in responding to patient inquiries: a real-time implementation in the electronic health record

Large language models for biomedicine: foundations, opportunities, challenges, and best practices

Do Physicians Know How to Prompt? The Need for Automatic Prompt Optimization Help in Clinical Note Generation