Abstract:Adaptively managing marine protected areas (MPAs) requires accurately assessing whether established MPAs are achieving their goals of protecting and conserving biomass, especially for harvested populations. Ecological MPA assessments commonly compare inside of the MPA to a reference point outside of and/or before implementation (i.e., calculating "response ratios"). Yet, MPAs are not simple ecological experiments; by design, protected populations interact with those outside, and population dynamic responses can be nonlinear. This complicates assessment interpretations. Here, we used a two‐patch population model to explore how MPA response ratios (outside–inside, before–after, and before–after‐control‐impact [BACI]) for fished populations behave under different conditions, like whether the population is receiving a sustainable larval supply or if it is declining despite protection from harvest. We then conducted a Bayesian evaluation of MPA effects on fish and invertebrate populations based on data collected from 82 published studies on 264 no‐take MPAs worldwide, using the results of an earlier global meta‐analysis as priors. We considered the effects of calculating different summary metrics on these results, drawing on the theoretical insights from our population model as a comparative framework. We demonstrate that not all response ratio comparison types provide the same information: For example, outside–inside and BACI comparisons can fail to detect population decline within MPAs, whereas before–after comparisons likely detect that pattern. Considering these limitations, we nonetheless found that MPAs globally are producing positive outcomes, with on average greater biomass, density, and organism size within their boundaries than reference sites. However, only a small portion of studies (18 of 82) provided the temporal data necessary to determine that protection, on average, has led to increased abundance of populations within MPAs over time. These findings demonstrate the importance of considering the underlying system dynamics when assessing MPA effects. Assuming that large outside–inside or BACI response ratios always reflect large and net positive conservation effects may lead to misleading conclusions, we recommend that: (1) when assessing specific MPA effects, empirical findings be considered alongside theoretical knowledge relevant to that MPA system, and (2) management should respond to the local conditions and outcomes, rather than a blanket expectation for positive MPA effects.

Evidence of economic benefits from marine protected areas

Estimating the economic benefits and costs of highly‐protected marine protected areas

A global test of MPA spillover benefits to recreational fisheries

The long‐term impacts of Marine Protected Areas on fish catch and socioeconomic development in Tanzania

Protection outcomes for fish trophic groups across a range of management regimes

Evaluating the long term effectiveness of a Mediterranean marine protected area to tackle the effects of invasive and range expanding herbivorous fish on rocky reefs

Are there economic benefits from marine protected areas? An analysis of scuba diver expenditure

Evaluating the Effects of a Deep-Water Marine Protected Area a Decade After Closure: A Multifaceted Approach Reveals Equivocal Benefits to Reef Fish Populations

Economic impacts at the county level of marine protected areas designation in China

Do reef fish assemblages benefit from a marine protected area in the north Pacific coast of Costa Rica?

Fisheries outcomes of marine protected area networks: Levels of protection, connectivity, and time matter

Ecological success of no‐take marine protected areas: Using population dynamics theory to inform a global meta‐analysis

Conservation and Sustainable Use Awareness among Visitors and Tour Operators of Marine Parks: Concise Review of the Benefits and Programs for Protecting Marine Biodiversity

Evaluating the influence of marine protected areas on surf zone fish

Understanding organism-habitat relationships and critically evaluating reference areas is key to marine protected area assessment

What’s the catch? Profiling the benefits and costs associated with marine protected areas and displaced fishing in the Scotia Sea

Collaborative fisheries research reveals reserve size and age determine efficacy across a network of marine protected areas

The effects of marine protected areas over time and species dispersal potential: A quantitative conservation conflict attempt

Decision analysis for designing marine protected areas for multiple species with uncertain fishery status

Socio-economic factors boosting the effectiveness of marine protected areas: A Bayesian network analysis

Baseline assessment and early effects of a network of marine protected areas