Outcomes of physeal-sparing posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for adolescents with an open physis

Xu Liu,Haibo Yang,Zhong Jun,Lingzhi Li,Zhaojun Wang,Zhong Li,Juncai Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-06037-9

Abstract:Purpose: The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture rarely occurs, especially in skeletally immature adolescents, and poses a dilemma in appropriately managing the open physis with its vast growth potential. However, although many epiphyseal-protecting techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been reported, a similar problem in PCL reconstruction has received scant attention and needs more relevant research. So, this study aims to evaluate the short-term clinical and imaging results of the arthroscopic physeal-sparing reconstruction program. Method: All the 13 patients we reviewed in this study have accepted the arthroscopic physeal-sparing PCL reconstruction from January 2019 to December 2022 in our Department of Orthopedics. Primary demographic data collected include gender (8 males and 5 females), age (11-15 years, average 13.3 years), follow-up period (15-35 months, average 25.2 months), injury mechanism (nine non-contact injuries and four contact injuries), and days following injury (1-10 days, average 5.3 days). The assessment of clinical outcomes included pre- and postoperative physical examination, knee functional scores, and imaging data. Result: All patients in this study were followed up with an average 25.2-month (range 15-35 months) follow-up period. All the cases preoperatively had a positive posterior drawer test and turned negative at the final follow-up. The average ROM improved from 103.6° ± 11.4° to 132.6° ± 3.6° at the last follow-up (p < 0.05). The VAS score decreased from 5.8 ± 1.6 to 0.9 ± 0.5 (p < 0.05); the average KT-1000 healthy-side to affected-side difference decreased from 11.3 ± 1.6 to1.8 ± 0.5 mm. The comparison of all the knee functional scores (IKDC, Tegner scores, and Lysholm) at preoperative and last follow-up showed a significant difference (p < 0.05). None of the cases had operation-related complications, and all recovered to sports well. Conclusion: The arthroscopic physeal-sparing posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a dependable and recommended treatment for posterior cruciate ligament rupture in adolescents with open physis, showing a striking improvement in knee function without growth arrest and angular deformity of the affected limb in the short-term follow-up.