Abstract:Introduction: The abrupt COVID-19 related healthcare closures across Ontario, Canada resulted in a rapidly growing backlog of patients referred to the Provincial Rapid Access Clinics (RACs) Program, designed to manage patients suffering from unmanageable low back pain (LBP). Left untreated or poorly treated, LBP can lead to a significant burden on patients and the health system. Expeditious implementation of virtual care (VC) became a necessity, however, frontline clinicians identified lack of confidence and experience with LBP-VC. To ensure continuity in patient-centered care, a Toolkit was developed to enable delivery of a standardized guideline-based integrated LBP pathway through VC. Aims, Objectives, Theory or Methods: A coordinated in-depth multi-stakeholder engagement process was utilized to address clinicians’ concerns to promote confident adoption of VC. A system-level rapid response approach led through a centralized clinical and digital provincial infrastructure was used for Toolkit development. Toolkit structure, content and refinement was determined through an iterative mix-methods approach undertaken with provincial LBP stakeholders on how best to implement an established evidence-based shared-care LBP clinical pathway through VC. This approach facilitated acceptable strategies for barrier mitigation and enabled optimization to be rapidly developed on a provincial level with necessary resources and guidelines to deliver standardized LBP-VC across Ontario. Highlights or Results or Key Findings: Toolkit resources have been adopted across 16 urban and rural regions in Ontario. Engaging front-line clinicians, (including spine surgeons), was critical for active implementation of VC that was safe, effective, and met professional requirements. Stakeholders for operational oversight included government, hospital and regional administrators, and professional colleges and associations. With collaborative provincial leadership, barriers and enablers to LBP-VC were systematically identified. Extensive multi-stakeholder consultation which included patient feedback, provided pragmatic information related to privacy; informed consent; professional standards; regional variations, and clinical and patient barriers and enablers. Emergent themes included technology requirements, administrative processes, educational needs, and professional standards. Four hundred and forty LBP-VC patient satisfaction questionnaires were completed (June 2020-May 2021). Based on a 5-point Likert scale, (5 most positive), overall satisfaction and likelihood of participating again was 4.7/5. Qualitative analysis revealed three themes with VC, importance of human connection, patient-perceived virtual physical examination limitations and VC efficiencies. Conclusions: A Toolkit enabled a standardized province-wide approach to LBP-VC. Multi-stakeholder engagement was utilized to understand barriers, identify enablers, and ultimately promote patient and provider adoption and confidence with LBP-VC. With collaborative leadership, and extensive engagement, clinical resources and guidelines were developed and implemented province-wide with excellent face-validity based on patient and provider feedback and uptake. Implications for applicability/transferability, sustainability and limitations: There is a need to further assess patient preference for care delivery during normal and non-emergency circumstances (COVID-19). Future directions include validating LBP-VC physical examination findings compared to hands-on assessment. There is also a need to explore cost-effectiveness of LBP-VC at scale; patient-related factors including demographics, satisfaction, preference, and acceptance with LBP-VC; treatment outcomes, including surgical; safety considerations such as security of online platforms, physical patient safety during the assessment; and comparing rate of escalation to surgeon with in-person and virtual assessment.

Clinicians' Perspective on Implementing Virtual Hospital Care for Low Back Pain: Qualitative Study

Process and implementation evaluation of a virtual hospital model of care for low back pain (Back@Home)

Hospital Staff Perspectives on the Drivers and Challenges in Implementing a Virtual Rehabilitation Ward: Qualitative Study

Multi-stakeholder Engagement and Development of a Virtual Care Toolkit for Integrated Guideline-Based Low Back Pain Management

Needs assessment for health service design for people with back pain in a hospital setting: A qualitative study

Stakeholders' perspective on the development of a virtual clinic for patients with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study

Patient and Staff Insights on Digital Care Pathways for Patients With Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study

Twenty-first century house calls: a survey of ambulatory care providers to inform organisational telehealth strategy

Virtual Home Care for Patients With Acute Illness

Accessing care within team-based models of primary care for the management of chronic low back pain in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative study of patient experiences

Patient and Provider Experiences With Compassionate Care in Virtual Physiatry: Qualitative Study

Primary care barriers and facilitators to nonpharmacologic treatments for low back pain: A qualitative pilot study

Clinician Perspectives on Virtual Specialty Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Illnesses

A Series of Virtual Interventions for Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Feasibility Pilot Study for a Series of Personalized (N-of-1) Trials

Virtual reality in the management of patients with low back and neck pain: a retrospective analysis of 82 people treated solely in the metaverse

Implementation of back to living well, a community-based program for the tertiary prevention of low back pain: a study protocol

Implementation of a Web-Based Outpatient Asynchronous Consultation Service: Mixed Methods Study

Virtual Care: Perspectives From Family Physicians

Impact of virtual visits on primary care physician work flows

Barriers, facilitators and next steps for sustaining and scaling virtual hospital services in Australia: a qualitative descriptive study

Factors Impacting the Adoption and Potential Reimbursement of a Virtual Reality Tool for Pain Management in Switzerland: Qualitative Case Study