Abstract:Objective: To compare the effects of robot-assisted therapy with conventional therapy for accelerating stratified intervention in poststroke patients with upper limb dysfunction. Background: For stroke survivors, recovery of upper extremity function remains a major challenge in rehabilitation. Literature has suggested that the rate of recovery may improve if treatments can be individualized to their clinical profiles. However, there still lack clinical evidence on how to create treatment tailored to individual patients. Robot-assisted Therapy (RT) provides a straightforward approach to adjustment of the assistance-resistance continuum for individual patients. In early Brunnstrom stages of recovery, patients benefit from assistance training, whereas in later stages the training is favored with resistance. Therefore, RT may enhance Conventional Therapy (CT) but the use of RT in stratified intervention has not been investigated. This study evaluated the possible benefit of adopting RT following a protocol of upper-limb training, which was stratified with the Brunnstrom stage of each individual. Methods: This study was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. A total of 53 patients with stroke were recruited and randomized into 2 groups (CT, n = 27, 3 dropped out and RT, n = 26, 2 dropped out). Both groups were trained once per day, 5 days per week for 4 weeks. The CT group received 30 min of conventional therapy; the RT group received 30 min of upper limb robot-assisted training. Patients were assessed at the beginning, week-2, and week-4 of the treatment. The outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper-Extremity (FMA-UE) and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI). Results: Across the 4-week intervention, participants in the RT group recovered 1.979 points of FMA-UE per week, compared to 1.198 points per week in the CT group (t94 = 3.333, p < 0.01); the recovery rate was 0.781 points/week higher in the RT group than in the CT group. Moreover, the recovery of FMA-UE was faster in proximal joints (t94 = 3.199, p < 0.01), and for patients in Brunnstrom Stage III (t34 = 2.526, p < 0.05). The improvements in MBI were not significantly different between RT and CT. Conclusion: Robot-assisted therapy showed initial evidence for the acceleration of post-stroke recovery of motor function in the upper limb. Initial observations suggested that patients in Brunnstrom recovery stage III might benefit the most from the stratified intervention assisted by robotics. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=61834, Identifier [ChiCTR2000039010]. Registered 13 March 2020.

Neurophysiological underpinnings of an intensive protocol for upper limb motor recovery in subacute and chronic stroke patients

Neurophysiological and Clinical Effects of Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation on Motor Recovery in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol

Quantification of Upper Limb Motor Recovery and EEG Power Changes after Robot-Assisted Bilateral Arm Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Prospective Pilot Study

Implementation of a robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation protocol for a customized treatment after stroke: A retrospective analysis

Predictors and brain connectivity changes associated with arm motor function improvement from intensive practice in chronic stroke

Effects of robot-assisted task-oriented upper limb motor training on neuroplasticity in stroke patients with different degrees of motor dysfunction: A neuroimaging motor evaluation index

Effectiveness of Two Models of Telerehabilitation in Improving Recovery from Subacute Upper Limb Disability after Stroke: Robotic vs. Non-Robotic

Wrist Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation Treatment in Subacute and Chronic Stroke Patients: From Distal-to-Proximal Motor Recovery

Effects of upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation on motor function recovery and neuromuscular electrophysiological changes of stroke patients

Neural Plasticity Changes Induced by Motor Robotic Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients: The Contribution of Functional Neuroimaging

The efficacy of hybrid neuroprostheses in the rehabilitation of upper limb impairment after stroke, a narrative and systematic review with a meta-analysis

Robot-assisted therapy in stratified intervention: a randomized controlled trial on poststroke motor recovery

A Paradigm Shift: Rehabilitation Robotics, Cognitive Skills Training, and Function After Stroke

Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke

Robotic Kinematic measures of the arm in chronic Stroke: part 1 – Motor Recovery patterns from tDCS preceding intensive training

Effects of Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation Compared with Conventional Therapy in Patients with Stroke: Preliminary Results on a Daily Task Assessed Using Motion Analysis

Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper-limb function of acute stroke patients

Action Observation Therapy for Arm Recovery after Stroke: A Preliminary Investigation on a Novel Protocol with EEG Monitoring

The use of enhanced intrinsic feedback for motor learning in stroke survivors: Clinical trial protocol

Restoring of Interhemispheric Symmetry in Patients With Stroke Following Bilateral or Unilateral Robot-Assisted Upper-Limb Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Proprioceptive Based Training for stroke recovery. Proposal of new treatment modality for rehabilitation of upper limb in neurological diseases